Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Delhi High Court Upholds Denial of Regular Bail in Large-Scale Economic Fraud Cases: Sunil Dahiya v. State

Delhi High Court Upholds Denial of Regular Bail in Large-Scale Economic Fraud Cases: Sunil Dahiya v. State

Date: Oct 19, 2016
Delhi High Court Upholds Denial of Regular Bail in Large-Scale Economic Fraud Cases: Sunil Dahiya v. State Introduction In the landmark case of Sunil Dahiya Petitioner v. State (Govt. Of Nct Of...
Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies and Validity of Satisfaction Notes under Section 153C: Rajesh Sunderdas Vaswani v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies and Validity of Satisfaction Notes under Section 153C: Rajesh Sunderdas Vaswani v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Oct 11, 2016
Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies and Validity of Satisfaction Notes under Section 153C Rajesh Sunderdas Vaswani v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Gujarat High Court, October 10, 2016...
Raffles Design v. Educomp: Extending Section 9 to International Arbitral Proceedings under the 2015 Amendment

Raffles Design v. Educomp: Extending Section 9 to International Arbitral Proceedings under the 2015 Amendment

Date: Oct 8, 2016
Raffles Design v. Educomp: Extending Section 9 to International Arbitral Proceedings under the 2015 Amendment Introduction In the landmark case of Raffles Design International India Private Limited &...
Meghalaya High Court Reaffirms Mandatory Consultation with Public Service Commission in Government Promotions

Meghalaya High Court Reaffirms Mandatory Consultation with Public Service Commission in Government Promotions

Date: Oct 6, 2016
Meghalaya High Court Reaffirms Mandatory Consultation with Public Service Commission in Government Promotions Introduction The case of Shri Damien Rongrin v. State Of Meghalaya And Others was...
Tripura High Court Establishes New Precedence on ACR and APAR Communication in Promotions

Tripura High Court Establishes New Precedence on ACR and APAR Communication in Promotions

Date: Oct 6, 2016
Tripura High Court Establishes New Precedence on ACR and APAR Communication in Promotions Introduction In the case of Satish Kumar Garg v. Union Of India, adjudicated by the Tripura High Court on...
Karnataka High Court Upholds State’s Authority to Tax Electricity Consumption: Vijaya Steels Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd.

Karnataka High Court Upholds State’s Authority to Tax Electricity Consumption: Vijaya Steels Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd.

Date: Oct 5, 2016
Karnataka High Court Upholds State’s Authority to Tax Electricity Consumption: Vijaya Steels Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. Introduction Case: Vijaya Steels Limited v. Bangalore...
Enhanced Protection Against Pendente Lite Transfers: Insights from Prakash Gobindram Ahuja v. Ganesh Pandharinath Dhonde

Enhanced Protection Against Pendente Lite Transfers: Insights from Prakash Gobindram Ahuja v. Ganesh Pandharinath Dhonde

Date: Oct 5, 2016
Enhanced Protection Against Pendente Lite Transfers: Insights from Prakash Gobindram Ahuja v. Ganesh Pandharinath Dhonde Introduction The case of Prakash Gobindram Ahuja v. Ganesh Pandharinath...
Delhi High Court Upholds NTPC's Tender Qualification Standards on Drilling for Blasting Purposes

Delhi High Court Upholds NTPC's Tender Qualification Standards on Drilling for Blasting Purposes

Date: Oct 1, 2016
Delhi High Court Upholds NTPC's Tender Qualification Standards on Drilling for Blasting Purposes Introduction The case of Montecarlo Limited Petitioner v. NTPC Limited revolves around the...
Regulatory Measures for Maintaining the Nobility of the Legal Profession: Amar Sinha v. Bar Council Of India

Regulatory Measures for Maintaining the Nobility of the Legal Profession: Amar Sinha v. Bar Council Of India

Date: Oct 1, 2016
Regulatory Measures for Maintaining the Nobility of the Legal Profession: Amar Sinha v. Bar Council Of India Introduction The case of Amar Sinha & Anr. v. Bar Council Of India & Ors. was adjudicated...
Appealability of Orders under Section 37 A&C Act: Insights from Harmanprit Singh Sidhu v. Arcadia Shares & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd.

Appealability of Orders under Section 37 A&C Act: Insights from Harmanprit Singh Sidhu v. Arcadia Shares & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Oct 1, 2016
Appealability of Orders under Section 37 A&C Act: Insights from Harmanprit Singh Sidhu v. Arcadia Shares & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Harmanprit Singh Sidhu v. Arcadia Shares &...
Madras High Court Upholds Exclusive Jurisdiction of RDDB Act Over Civil Suits in OSA. Both Osas Judgment

Madras High Court Upholds Exclusive Jurisdiction of RDDB Act Over Civil Suits in OSA. Both Osas Judgment

Date: Sep 29, 2016
Madras High Court Upholds Exclusive Jurisdiction of RDDB Act Over Civil Suits in OSA. Both Osas Judgment Introduction The case of M/S. Cambridge Solutions Limited, Bangalore vs. Global Software...
Clarifying the Definition of 'Developer' under Section 80-IA(4): High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Trg Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Clarifying the Definition of 'Developer' under Section 80-IA(4): High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Trg Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Sep 28, 2016
Clarifying the Definition of 'Developer' under Section 80-IA(4): High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Trg Industries Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S....
Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies Under Cr.P.C Before Invoking Section 482: Madras High Court's Landmark Judgment

Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies Under Cr.P.C Before Invoking Section 482: Madras High Court's Landmark Judgment

Date: Sep 28, 2016
Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies Under Cr.P.C Before Invoking Section 482: Madras High Court's Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of...
Enhanced Guidelines for Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection in Income Tax Assessments

Enhanced Guidelines for Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection in Income Tax Assessments

Date: Sep 27, 2016
Enhanced Guidelines for Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection in Income Tax Assessments Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Pune v. PTC Software (I) Pvt. Ltd., the...
Madras High Court Affirms Minority Institutions' Exemption from RTE Act 2009 and Related Government Orders

Madras High Court Affirms Minority Institutions' Exemption from RTE Act 2009 and Related Government Orders

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Madras High Court Affirms Minority Institutions' Exemption from RTE Act 2009 and Related Government Orders Introduction In the case of A. Firdose Begum Petitioner v. The Secretary To Government,...
Citizenship by Birth: Expanding Rights for Tibetan Refugee Offspring in India

Citizenship by Birth: Expanding Rights for Tibetan Refugee Offspring in India

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Citizenship by Birth: Expanding Rights for Tibetan Refugee Offspring in India Introduction In the landmark case of Phuntsok Wangyal Petitioner v. Ministry Of External Affairs & Ors., decided by the...
Enhanced Compensation Standards in Land Acquisition: The Precedent of Koli-Kopar v. State of Maharashtra

Enhanced Compensation Standards in Land Acquisition: The Precedent of Koli-Kopar v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Enhanced Compensation Standards in Land Acquisition: The Precedent of Koli-Kopar v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of State of Maharashtra v. M.R. Koli by His Heirs and Others is a...
Bombay High Court Sets Compensation for Land Acquisition at ₹25 per Sq.M in Koli-Kopar

Bombay High Court Sets Compensation for Land Acquisition at ₹25 per Sq.M in Koli-Kopar

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Bombay High Court Sets Compensation for Land Acquisition at ₹25 per Sq.M in Koli-Kopar Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Maharashtra v. Shri. Atmaram Kashinath Pawar, the Bombay High...
Rs.25/sqm Compensation Rate Established for Land Acquisition in Adjacent Areas: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. GOPAL ARJUN PATIL (DECD.) BY HEIRS

Rs.25/sqm Compensation Rate Established for Land Acquisition in Adjacent Areas: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. GOPAL ARJUN PATIL (DECD.) BY HEIRS

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Rs.25/sqm Compensation Rate Established for Land Acquisition in Adjacent Areas: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. GOPAL ARJUN PATIL (DECD.) BY HEIRS Introduction The case of The State of Maharashtra v....
Establishing Rs.25/sqm Compensation in Land Acquisition: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. CHANGA H.PATIL

Establishing Rs.25/sqm Compensation in Land Acquisition: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. CHANGA H.PATIL

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Establishing Rs.25/sqm Compensation in Land Acquisition: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. CHANGA H.PATIL Introduction The case of The State of Maharashtra v. Changa H. Patil adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert