Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Clarity in Penalty Notices Under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Visakhapatnam v. Smt. Baisetty Revathi

Clarity in Penalty Notices Under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Visakhapatnam v. Smt. Baisetty Revathi

Date: Jul 14, 2017
Clarity in Penalty Notices Under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Visakhapatnam v. Smt. Baisetty Revathi Introduction The case of The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I,...
Strict Adherence to Section 35(1) of POCSO: Karnataka High Court in VINAY v. State of Karnataka

Strict Adherence to Section 35(1) of POCSO: Karnataka High Court in VINAY v. State of Karnataka

Date: Jul 14, 2017
Strict Adherence to Section 35(1) of POCSO: Karnataka High Court in VINAY v. State of Karnataka Introduction The case of VINAY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA was adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on...
Delhi High Court Upholds Cumulative Application of Arbitration Act and SARFAESI Act

Delhi High Court Upholds Cumulative Application of Arbitration Act and SARFAESI Act

Date: Jul 14, 2017
Delhi High Court Upholds Cumulative Application of Arbitration Act and SARFAESI Act Introduction The case of M.D Frozen Foods Exports Private Limited & Others Petitioners v. Hero Fincorp Limited...
Madras High Court Establishes Cenvat Credit Eligibility for Structurals and Foundation Materials in Thiru Arooran Sugars v. CESTAT

Madras High Court Establishes Cenvat Credit Eligibility for Structurals and Foundation Materials in Thiru Arooran Sugars v. CESTAT

Date: Jul 11, 2017
Madras High Court Establishes Cenvat Credit Eligibility for Structurals and Foundation Materials in Thiru Arooran Sugars v. CESTAT Introduction In the landmark case of Thiru Arooran Sugars v. CESTAT,...
Narrow Interpretation of 'Commercial Dispute' under Section 2(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act

Narrow Interpretation of 'Commercial Dispute' under Section 2(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act

Date: Jul 11, 2017
Narrow Interpretation of 'Commercial Dispute' under Section 2(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act: Gujarat High Court's Ruling in Vasu Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. v. Gujarat Akruti Tcg Biotech Ltd....
Court Affirms Strict Compliance with Section 153C Requirements in Seizure Cases

Court Affirms Strict Compliance with Section 153C Requirements in Seizure Cases

Date: Jul 11, 2017
Court Affirms Strict Compliance with Section 153C Requirements in Seizure Cases Introduction In the case of Canyon Financial Services Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer, the Delhi High Court addressed...
Restriction on Pre-Arrest Bail under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act: Ashok Sahani v. State of Bihar Analysis

Restriction on Pre-Arrest Bail under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act: Ashok Sahani v. State of Bihar Analysis

Date: Jul 8, 2017
Restriction on Pre-Arrest Bail under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act: Ashok Sahani v. State of Bihar 1. Introduction The case of Ashok Sahani v. State of Bihar adjudicated by the Patna High Court on...
Limitation Period and SARFAESI Act: Calcutta High Court Sets Important Precedent in Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty vs Allahabad Bank

Limitation Period and SARFAESI Act: Calcutta High Court Sets Important Precedent in Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty vs Allahabad Bank

Date: Jul 8, 2017
Limitation Period and SARFAESI Act: Calcutta High Court Sets Important Precedent in Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty vs Allahabad Bank Introduction The case of Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty vs Allahabad Bank &...
Comprehensive Commentary on STATE v. GHANSHYAM: Affirmation of Acquittal in Negligence Case

Comprehensive Commentary on STATE v. GHANSHYAM: Affirmation of Acquittal in Negligence Case

Date: Jul 8, 2017
Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Ghanshyam: Affirmation of Acquittal in Negligence Case Introduction The case of State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ghanshyam adjudicated by the Himachal Pradesh High...
Maintainability of Intra-Court Appeals Under Articles 226 and 227: Insights from Shaillendra Kumar v. Divisional Forest Officer And Another

Maintainability of Intra-Court Appeals Under Articles 226 and 227: Insights from Shaillendra Kumar v. Divisional Forest Officer And Another

Date: Jul 7, 2017
Maintainability of Intra-Court Appeals Under Articles 226 and 227: Insights from Shaillendra Kumar v. Divisional Forest Officer And Another 1. Introduction The case of Shaillendra Kumar v. Divisional...
High Court Upholds Acquittal in State v. Kallu: Standards for Appellate Review in Acquittal Cases

High Court Upholds Acquittal in State v. Kallu: Standards for Appellate Review in Acquittal Cases

Date: Jul 5, 2017
High Court Upholds Acquittal in State v. Kallu: Standards for Appellate Review in Acquittal Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State v. Kallu, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on July...
Delhi High Court Sets Balanced Precedent on Interim Measures under Section 9 of Arbitration Act

Delhi High Court Sets Balanced Precedent on Interim Measures under Section 9 of Arbitration Act

Date: Jul 4, 2017
Delhi High Court Sets Balanced Precedent on Interim Measures under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Introduction The Delhi High Court, in the case of Ajay Singh v. Kal Airways Private Limited And Ors.,...
Delhi High Court Establishes Cognizability of PMLA Offenses in Virbhadra Singh v. Enforcement Directorate

Delhi High Court Establishes Cognizability of PMLA Offenses in Virbhadra Singh v. Enforcement Directorate

Date: Jul 4, 2017
Delhi High Court Establishes Cognizability of PMLA Offenses in Virbhadra Singh v. Enforcement Directorate Introduction The case of Virbhadra Singh & Anr. Petitioners v. Enforcement Directorate & Anr....
Enforcement of 'No-Squatting' Zones: Vyapari Kalyan Mandal v. SDMC (2017)

Enforcement of 'No-Squatting' Zones: Vyapari Kalyan Mandal v. SDMC (2017)

Date: Jul 4, 2017
Enforcement of 'No-Squatting' Zones: Vyapari Kalyan Mandal v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (2017) Introduction The case of Vyapari Kalyan Mandal Main Pushpa & Anr. Petitioners v. South Delhi...
Service Regularization and Exclusion of Ad-hoc Appointments for Selection Grades: Analysis of STATE OF RAJ AND ORS v. CHANDRAPAL & ORS

Service Regularization and Exclusion of Ad-hoc Appointments for Selection Grades: Analysis of STATE OF RAJ AND ORS v. CHANDRAPAL & ORS

Date: Jul 4, 2017
Service Regularization and Exclusion of Ad-hoc Appointments for Selection Grades: Analysis of STATE OF RAJ AND ORS v. CHANDRAPAL & ORS Introduction The case of STATE OF RAJ AND ORS v. CHANDRAPAL &...
Grant of Assured Career Progression (ACP) to Employees Without Further Promotional Avenues

Grant of Assured Career Progression (ACP) to Employees Without Further Promotional Avenues

Date: Jul 4, 2017
Grant of Assured Career Progression (ACP) to Employees Without Further Promotional Avenues Introduction The case of Uday Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar adjudicated by the Patna High Court on July...
Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore

Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore

Date: Jun 30, 2017
Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore Introduction The case of United India Insurance Co....
Clarifying the Maintainability of Order IX Rule 13 Applications in CPC Proceedings: Insights from R.P. Bros v. Fakhruddin Siraj Topiwala

Clarifying the Maintainability of Order IX Rule 13 Applications in CPC Proceedings: Insights from R.P. Bros v. Fakhruddin Siraj Topiwala

Date: Jun 29, 2017
Clarifying the Maintainability of Order IX Rule 13 Applications in CPC Proceedings: Insights from R.P. Bros v. Fakhruddin Siraj Topiwala Introduction The legal landscape concerning the setting aside...
Distinguishing Public Order from Law and Order in Preventive Detention: Telangana High Court's Landmark Judgment

Distinguishing Public Order from Law and Order in Preventive Detention: Telangana High Court's Landmark Judgment

Date: Jun 28, 2017
Distinguishing Public Order from Law and Order in Preventive Detention: Telangana High Court's Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of C. Neela v. State Of Telangana adjudicated by the Telangana...
Reaffirmation of Natural Justice Principles in Customs Licensing: Kerala High Court Remands Revocation Proceedings in Krishna Brothers Case

Reaffirmation of Natural Justice Principles in Customs Licensing: Kerala High Court Remands Revocation Proceedings in Krishna Brothers Case

Date: Jun 24, 2017
Reaffirmation of Natural Justice Principles in Customs Licensing: Kerala High Court Remands Revocation Proceedings in Krishna Brothers Case Introduction The case of Krishna Brothers v. Commissioner...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert