Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Departmental Competitive Promotions as Regular Promotions under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Departmental Competitive Promotions as Regular Promotions under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme

Date: May 11, 2018
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Departmental Competitive Promotions as Regular Promotions under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Introduction The case Union Of India And Others v. Dev...
Allahabad High Court Affirms Inherent Power to Quash Matrimonial Criminal Proceedings Upon Settlement

Allahabad High Court Affirms Inherent Power to Quash Matrimonial Criminal Proceedings Upon Settlement

Date: May 10, 2018
Allahabad High Court Affirms Inherent Power to Quash Matrimonial Criminal Proceedings Upon Settlement Introduction In the landmark case of Najmul Hasan And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home...
High Court Upholds Article 227 Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Commercial Courts Act's Section 8

High Court Upholds Article 227 Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Commercial Courts Act's Section 8

Date: May 8, 2018
High Court Upholds Article 227 Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Commercial Courts Act's Section 8 Introduction The case State of Gujarat v. Union of India was adjudicated by the Gujarat High Court on...
Praxis Energy Agents Sa v. M.T. Pratibha Neera: Clarifying Limits on Multiple Ship Arrests in Maritime Claims

Praxis Energy Agents Sa v. M.T. Pratibha Neera: Clarifying Limits on Multiple Ship Arrests in Maritime Claims

Date: May 5, 2018
Praxis Energy Agents Sa v. M.T. Pratibha Neera: Clarifying Limits on Multiple Ship Arrests in Maritime Claims 1. Introduction The case of Praxis Energy Agents Sa v. M.T. Pratibha Neera adjudicated by...
Sunsuk Industries v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Clarifying Suppression of Facts and Clubbed Clearances in Central Excise Law

Sunsuk Industries v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Clarifying Suppression of Facts and Clubbed Clearances in Central Excise Law

Date: May 5, 2018
Sunsuk Industries v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Clarifying Suppression of Facts and Clubbed Clearances in Central Excise Law Introduction Sunsuk Industries v. Commissioner Of Central Excise,...
S.S. Binu v. State Of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta High Court Judgment Analysis

S.S. Binu v. State Of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta High Court Judgment Analysis

Date: May 4, 2018
Calcutta High Court Establishes Non-Mandatory Nature of Section 202 Cr.P.C. for Negotiable Instruments Act Offences Introduction In the case S.S. Binu v. State Of West Bengal & Anr. (CRR 1600 of...
Reaffirming the Sanctity of Arbitral Awards and Limited Judicial Review: Adtv Communication Pvt. Ltd. v. Vibha Goel & Ors.

Reaffirming the Sanctity of Arbitral Awards and Limited Judicial Review: Adtv Communication Pvt. Ltd. v. Vibha Goel & Ors.

Date: May 4, 2018
Reaffirming the Sanctity of Arbitral Awards and Limited Judicial Review: Adtv Communication Pvt. Ltd. v. Vibha Goel & Ors. Introduction The legal dispute in Adtv Communication Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Aez...
Niraj Kumar Mallick v. State Of Bihar: Clarifying Compassionate Appointments for Dependents of Deceased Government Servants

Niraj Kumar Mallick v. State Of Bihar: Clarifying Compassionate Appointments for Dependents of Deceased Government Servants

Date: May 3, 2018
Niraj Kumar Mallick v. State Of Bihar: Clarifying Compassionate Appointments for Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Introduction The case of Niraj Kumar Mallick v. State Of Bihar, adjudicated...
Patna High Court Clarifies Withholding of Gratuity and Leave Encashment in Presence of Pending Proceedings

Patna High Court Clarifies Withholding of Gratuity and Leave Encashment in Presence of Pending Proceedings

Date: May 3, 2018
Patna High Court Clarifies Withholding of Gratuity and Leave Encashment in Presence of Pending Proceedings Introduction The case of Arvind Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar was adjudicated by the Patna...
Retrospective Regularization of NMR Employees under G.O.Ms. No. 212: A Landmark Judgment by Telangana High Court

Retrospective Regularization of NMR Employees under G.O.Ms. No. 212: A Landmark Judgment by Telangana High Court

Date: May 3, 2018
Retrospective Regularization of NMR Employees under G.O.Ms. No. 212: A Landmark Judgment by Telangana High Court Introduction The case of The Government Of A.P. Rep. By Its Principal Secretary, Pr &...
Clarifying the Distinction Between Procedural Orders and Arbitral Awards under Section 34: Rhiti Sports Management Pvt. Ltd. v. Power Play Sports & Events Ltd.

Clarifying the Distinction Between Procedural Orders and Arbitral Awards under Section 34: Rhiti Sports Management Pvt. Ltd. v. Power Play Sports & Events Ltd.

Date: May 2, 2018
Clarifying the Distinction Between Procedural Orders and Arbitral Awards under Section 34: Rhiti Sports Management Pvt. Ltd. v. Power Play Sports & Events Ltd. Introduction The case of Rhiti Sports...
Sikkim High Court Reaffirms Privacy Protections under RTI Act: Ban on Disclosure of Personal Information Without Public Interest

Sikkim High Court Reaffirms Privacy Protections under RTI Act: Ban on Disclosure of Personal Information Without Public Interest

Date: May 1, 2018
Sikkim High Court Reaffirms Privacy Protections under RTI Act: Ban on Disclosure of Personal Information Without Public Interest Introduction The case of Sancha Bahadur Subba v. State Of Sikkim...
Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Decision on Reopening Tax Assessments under Section 147

Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Decision on Reopening Tax Assessments under Section 147

Date: Apr 28, 2018
Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Decision on Reopening Tax Assessments under Section 147 Introduction In the case of Rakesh Gupta Petitioner v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula And Another...
High Court Mandates Central Bureau of Investigation for Anti-Tobacco Enforcement in Tamil Nadu

High Court Mandates Central Bureau of Investigation for Anti-Tobacco Enforcement in Tamil Nadu

Date: Apr 27, 2018
High Court Mandates Central Bureau of Investigation for Anti-Tobacco Enforcement in Tamil Nadu Introduction The judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on April 26, 2018, represents a significant...
Clarifying Ratio Decidendi in Pension Eligibility: Insights from STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER v. BRAHM PAL SINGH

Clarifying Ratio Decidendi in Pension Eligibility: Insights from STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER v. BRAHM PAL SINGH

Date: Apr 27, 2018
Clarifying Ratio Decidendi in Pension Eligibility: Insights from STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER v. BRAHM PAL SINGH Introduction The case of STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER v. BRAHM PAL SINGH,...
MIDC v. Kailashchandra: Determining Fair Compensation in Land Acquisition

MIDC v. Kailashchandra: Determining Fair Compensation in Land Acquisition

Date: Apr 25, 2018
MIDC v. Kailashchandra: Determining Fair Compensation in Land Acquisition Introduction The case of Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation v. Kailashchandra adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Classification of Trademark Licensing Payments: Capital vs Revenue Expenditure – M/S. Hilton Roulunds Ltd. v. CIT

Classification of Trademark Licensing Payments: Capital vs Revenue Expenditure – M/S. Hilton Roulunds Ltd. v. CIT

Date: Apr 21, 2018
Classification of Trademark Licensing Payments: Capital vs Revenue Expenditure – M/S. Hilton Roulunds Ltd. v. CIT Introduction The case of M/S. Hilton Roulunds Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Determining Sale Consideration in Non-Arm's Length Transactions: Arjun Malhotra v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Determining Sale Consideration in Non-Arm's Length Transactions: Arjun Malhotra v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Apr 21, 2018
Determining Sale Consideration in Non-Arm's Length Transactions: Arjun Malhotra v. Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The case of Arjun Malhotra v. Commissioner of Income Tax adjudicated by the...
Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam

Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam

Date: Apr 20, 2018
Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam Introduction The case of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay...
Mandatory vs Directory Time Limits in Customs House Licensing: Bombay High Court Sets Precedent

Mandatory vs Directory Time Limits in Customs House Licensing: Bombay High Court Sets Precedent

Date: Apr 20, 2018
Mandatory vs Directory Time Limits in Customs House Licensing: Bombay High Court Sets Precedent Introduction In the pivotal case The Principal Commissioner Of Customs (General) Mumbai Petitioner v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert