Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Trademark Infringement and Passing Off: Delhi High Court Upholds Prior User Rights in VICTOR vs VICTOR 80

Trademark Infringement and Passing Off: Delhi High Court Upholds Prior User Rights in VICTOR vs VICTOR 80

Date: Jul 10, 2018
Trademark Infringement and Passing Off: Delhi High Court Upholds Prior User Rights in VICTOR vs VICTOR 80 Introduction The case of Insecticides (India) Limited v. Parijat Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd....
Limits of Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act: Insights from Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Chandra Mani Tiwari

Limits of Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act: Insights from Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Chandra Mani Tiwari

Date: Jul 7, 2018
Limits of Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act: Insights from Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Chandra Mani Tiwari Introduction The case of Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Chandra Mani Tiwari was adjudicated by the...
Establishing Jurisdictional Limits under Section 47-D of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915: Anil Dhakad v. State of M.P.

Establishing Jurisdictional Limits under Section 47-D of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915: Anil Dhakad v. State of M.P.

Date: Jul 6, 2018
Establishing Jurisdictional Limits under Section 47-D of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915: Anil Dhakad v. State of M.P. Introduction Anil Dhakad v. State of M.P. is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Delhi High Court Clarifies Scope of 'Supplier' Under MSME Development Act: RIL vs. MSEFC

Delhi High Court Clarifies Scope of 'Supplier' Under MSME Development Act: RIL vs. MSEFC

Date: Jul 5, 2018
Delhi High Court Clarifies Scope of 'Supplier' Under MSME Development Act: RIL vs. MSEFC Introduction The case of M/S. Ramky Infrastructure Private Limited (RIL) vs. Micro and Small Enterprises...
Delhi High Court Upholds Compensation for Breach of Government Land Allotment Scheme

Delhi High Court Upholds Compensation for Breach of Government Land Allotment Scheme

Date: Jul 5, 2018
Delhi High Court Upholds Compensation for Breach of Government Land Allotment Scheme Introduction The case of Union of India & Anr. v. G. Singh & Anr. before the Delhi High Court, adjudicated on July...
Delhi High Court Establishes Strict Requirements for Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) Validity Post Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Delhi High Court Establishes Strict Requirements for Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) Validity Post Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Date: Jul 4, 2018
Delhi High Court Establishes Strict Requirements for Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) Validity Post Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Introduction In the case of A.N. Kaul Petitioner v. Neerja Kaul & Anr. S,...
Preserving Continuity of Service in Teacher Transfers: Shekhar P. Deshmukh v. Deputy Director Education and Others

Preserving Continuity of Service in Teacher Transfers: Shekhar P. Deshmukh v. Deputy Director Education and Others

Date: Jul 4, 2018
Preserving Continuity of Service in Teacher Transfers: Shekhar P. Deshmukh v. Deputy Director Education and Others Introduction The case of Shekhar P. Deshmukh vs. Deputy Director Education and...
Reaffirmation of 'Mana Scheduled Tribe' Status: Comprehensive Analysis of Gitesh v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee

Reaffirmation of 'Mana Scheduled Tribe' Status: Comprehensive Analysis of Gitesh v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee

Date: Jul 3, 2018
Reaffirmation of 'Mana Scheduled Tribe' Status: Comprehensive Analysis of Gitesh v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Introduction The case of Gitesh v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate...
Deductibility of Employee Contributions under Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B: Insights from Popular Vehicles & Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Deductibility of Employee Contributions under Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B: Insights from Popular Vehicles & Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Jul 3, 2018
Deductibility of Employee Contributions under Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B: Insights from Popular Vehicles & Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Popular...
C. Moorthy v. Sub Registrar, Aruppukkottai: Reinforcing the Limits of Registrar's Authority in Property Registration

C. Moorthy v. Sub Registrar, Aruppukkottai: Reinforcing the Limits of Registrar's Authority in Property Registration

Date: Jul 3, 2018
C. Moorthy v. Sub Registrar, Aruppukkottai: Reinforcing the Limits of Registrar's Authority in Property Registration Introduction C. Moorthy v. Sub Registrar, Aruppukkottai is a landmark judgment...
Reaffirming Locus Standi in Public Interest Litigation: Analysis of Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of M.P.

Reaffirming Locus Standi in Public Interest Litigation: Analysis of Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of M.P.

Date: Jun 29, 2018
Reaffirming Locus Standi in Public Interest Litigation: Analysis of Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of M.P. Introduction The case of Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of M.P. And Others adjudicated by...
Strengthening Borrower's Redemption Rights: Insights from Sri. Sai Annadhatha Polymers v. Canara Bank

Strengthening Borrower's Redemption Rights: Insights from Sri. Sai Annadhatha Polymers v. Canara Bank

Date: Jun 28, 2018
Strengthening Borrower's Redemption Rights: Insights from Sri. Sai Annadhatha Polymers v. Canara Bank Introduction In the landmark case of Sri. Sai Annadhatha Polymers And Another Petitioners v. The...
Bolstering Senior Citizens’ Rights: The Landmark Decision in Dattatrey Shivaji Mane v. Lilabai Shivaji Mane and Others

Bolstering Senior Citizens’ Rights: The Landmark Decision in Dattatrey Shivaji Mane v. Lilabai Shivaji Mane and Others

Date: Jun 27, 2018
Bolstering Senior Citizens’ Rights: The Landmark Decision in Dattatrey Shivaji Mane v. Lilabai Shivaji Mane and Others Introduction The case of Dattatrey Shivaji Mane v. Lilabai Shivaji Mane And...
Reevaluation of Presumption under POCSO Act in Navin Dhaniram Baraiye v. State Of Maharashtra

Reevaluation of Presumption under POCSO Act in Navin Dhaniram Baraiye v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Reevaluation of Presumption under POCSO Act in Navin Dhaniram Baraiye v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Navin Dhaniram Baraiye v. State Of Maharashtra was adjudicated by the Bombay...
Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A

Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A Introduction In the landmark case of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v....
Treatment of Returns Filed under Section 153A(1)(a) for Loss Carryforward

Treatment of Returns Filed under Section 153A(1)(a) for Loss Carryforward

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Treatment of Returns Filed under Section 153A(1)(a) for Loss Carryforward Introduction The case of Shrikant Mohta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central II, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Limits on Habeas Corpus Petitions in Missing Persons Cases: Selvaraj v. The State

Limits on Habeas Corpus Petitions in Missing Persons Cases: Selvaraj v. The State

Date: Jun 23, 2018
Limits on Habeas Corpus Petitions in Missing Persons Cases: Selvaraj v. The State Introduction The case of Selvaraj v. The State, Rep. By The Superintendent Of Police & Another was adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming Bail Principles Under Article 21: Delhi High Court’s Stance in Ashok Sagar v. State

Reaffirming Bail Principles Under Article 21: Delhi High Court’s Stance in Ashok Sagar v. State

Date: Jun 21, 2018
Reaffirming Bail Principles Under Article 21: Delhi High Court’s Stance in Ashok Sagar v. State Introduction The case of Ashok Sagar Petitioner v. State (NCT of Delhi) pronounced by the Delhi High...
Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others

Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others

Date: Jun 20, 2018
Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others Introduction The case of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others adjudicated...
Madras High Court Rules Overseas Agency Commissions for Procurement and Market Research Not Taxable in India

Madras High Court Rules Overseas Agency Commissions for Procurement and Market Research Not Taxable in India

Date: Jun 15, 2018
Madras High Court Rules Overseas Agency Commissions for Procurement and Market Research Not Taxable in India Introduction In the landmark case of M/S. Evolv Clothing Company Pvt Ltd., Chennai v. The...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert