Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Clarifying Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 on Pigmy Agents in Banking Sector: Insights from Anjangaon Surji Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner

Clarifying Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 on Pigmy Agents in Banking Sector: Insights from Anjangaon Surji Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner

Date: Apr 26, 2019
Clarifying Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 on Pigmy Agents in Banking Sector: Insights from Anjangaon Surji Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Introduction The case of...
Reaffirmation of EPF Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Insights from Shattarka Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha v. Assistant Provident Funds Commissioner

Reaffirmation of EPF Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Insights from Shattarka Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha v. Assistant Provident Funds Commissioner

Date: Apr 26, 2019
Reaffirmation of EPF Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Insights from Shattarka Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha v. Assistant Provident Funds Commissioner Introduction The case of Shattarka Nagri Sahakari Pat...
Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 to Pigmy Agents in Cooperative Banks: Insights from THE ASSISTANT Provident Fund Commissioner v. The Agrasen Nagari Sahakari Bank LTD.

Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 to Pigmy Agents in Cooperative Banks: Insights from THE ASSISTANT Provident Fund Commissioner v. The Agrasen Nagari Sahakari Bank LTD.

Date: Apr 26, 2019
Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 to Pigmy Agents in Cooperative Banks: Insights from THE ASSISTANT Provident Fund Commissioner v. The Agrasen Nagari Sahakari Bank LTD. Introduction The landmark...
Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Trademark Protection and Limits on Parties' Conduct: Anil Verma v. R.K. Jewellers SK Group

Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Trademark Protection and Limits on Parties' Conduct: Anil Verma v. R.K. Jewellers SK Group

Date: Apr 26, 2019
Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Trademark Protection and Limits on Parties' Conduct: Anil Verma v. R.K. Jewellers SK Group Introduction The case of Anil Verma v. R.K. Jewellers SK Group,...
EPF Applicability to Bank Collection Agents: Bombay High Court Remands Cases for Re-examination under Section 7-A

EPF Applicability to Bank Collection Agents: Bombay High Court Remands Cases for Re-examination under Section 7-A

Date: Apr 26, 2019
EPF Applicability to Bank Collection Agents: Bombay High Court Remands Cases for Re-examination under Section 7-A Introduction In the landmark judgment The Amravati Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd....
Clarification on EPF Act Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Bombay High Court Establishes New Parameters

Clarification on EPF Act Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Bombay High Court Establishes New Parameters

Date: Apr 26, 2019
Clarification on EPF Act Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Bombay High Court Establishes New Parameters Introduction The landmark judgment in Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur v. Bhartiya...
Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 to Pigmy Agents Confirmed: Bombay High Court's Landmark Judgment

Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 to Pigmy Agents Confirmed: Bombay High Court's Landmark Judgment

Date: Apr 26, 2019
Applicability of EPF Act, 1952 to Pigmy Agents Confirmed: Bombay High Court's Landmark Judgment Introduction In the landmark judgment delivered on April 25, 2019, by the Bombay High Court's Nagpur...
Provident Fund Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Insights from Bharti Maind Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha v. Central Board of Trustees

Provident Fund Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Insights from Bharti Maind Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha v. Central Board of Trustees

Date: Apr 26, 2019
Provident Fund Applicability to Pigmy Agents: Insights from Bharti Maind Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha v. Central Board of Trustees 1. Introduction The case Bharti Maind Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha,...
Reaffirming the Authority of EPF Commissioners: Implications for Pigmy Agents in Cooperative Banks

Reaffirming the Authority of EPF Commissioners: Implications for Pigmy Agents in Cooperative Banks

Date: Apr 26, 2019
Reaffirming the Authority of EPF Commissioners: Implications for Pigmy Agents in Cooperative Banks Introduction The judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court on April 25, 2019, in the case of...
Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence v. PRK Diamonds Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing Superior Jurisdiction of the Customs Act over the Code of Criminal Procedure in Seizure and Custody of Smuggled Goods

Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence v. PRK Diamonds Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing Superior Jurisdiction of the Customs Act over the Code of Criminal Procedure in Seizure and Custody of Smuggled Goods

Date: Apr 25, 2019
Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence v. PRK Diamonds Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing Superior Jurisdiction of the Customs Act over the Code of Criminal Procedure in Seizure and Custody of Smuggled Goods...
Balancing Delays and Compensation in Industrial Disputes: Vyasa Devi v. Executive Engineer, HPPWD

Balancing Delays and Compensation in Industrial Disputes: Vyasa Devi v. Executive Engineer, HPPWD

Date: Apr 25, 2019
Balancing Delays and Compensation in Industrial Disputes: Vyasa Devi v. Executive Engineer, HPPWD Introduction The case of Vyasa Devi v. Executive Engineer, HPPWD adjudicated by the Himachal Pradesh...
Limits of Mediation: Delhi High Court Upholds Inherent Power to Quash Serious Criminal Proceedings

Limits of Mediation: Delhi High Court Upholds Inherent Power to Quash Serious Criminal Proceedings

Date: Apr 23, 2019
Limits of Mediation: Delhi High Court Upholds Inherent Power to Quash Serious Criminal Proceedings Introduction The case of Yashpal Chaudhrani And Others v. State (Govt. Of NCT Delhi) And Another...
Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Distinctiveness in Bata India vs. Chawla Boot House

Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Distinctiveness in Bata India vs. Chawla Boot House

Date: Apr 17, 2019
Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Distinctiveness in Bata India Limited v. Chawla Boot House Introduction The case of Bata India Limited v. Chawla Boot House & Anr. was adjudicated by the Delhi High...
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Compliance for Reassessment Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act

Madras High Court Establishes Strict Compliance for Reassessment Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act

Date: Apr 17, 2019
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Compliance for Reassessment Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act Introduction In the landmark case of Asianet Star Communications Private Limited v. Assistant...
Article 226 Writ Jurisdiction in Cooperative Banking: Upholding Public Duty Over Alternative Remedies

Article 226 Writ Jurisdiction in Cooperative Banking: Upholding Public Duty Over Alternative Remedies

Date: Apr 14, 2019
Article 226 Writ Jurisdiction in Cooperative Banking: Upholding Public Duty Over Alternative Remedies Introduction The case of Gandhigram Agro Based Industrial Co.-Operative Society Ltd. v....
Reaffirmation of Bagasse as Agricultural Waste: Implications on CENVAT Credit Rules

Reaffirmation of Bagasse as Agricultural Waste: Implications on CENVAT Credit Rules

Date: Apr 13, 2019
Reaffirmation of Bagasse as Agricultural Waste: Implications on CENVAT Credit Rules Introduction The case of Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd. Through Its General Manager v. Union Of India, Ministry Of...
Kerala High Court Upholds Land Utilization Rights Under KLR Act

Kerala High Court Upholds Land Utilization Rights Under KLR Act

Date: Apr 13, 2019
Kerala High Court Upholds Land Utilization Rights Under KLR Act Introduction The case of T.V. Elias, Managing Partner, M/s. Krishnagiri Stone Crushers, Wayanad District & Others v. Sub Collector,...
Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. Judgment: Clarifying Section 44BB on Service Tax Reimbursement

Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. Judgment: Clarifying Section 44BB on Service Tax Reimbursement

Date: Apr 13, 2019
Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. Judgment: Clarifying Section 44BB on Service Tax Reimbursement 1. Introduction The case of Director of Income Tax v. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. adjudicated by the...
Concurrent Jurisdiction and Additional Monetary Relief under the Domestic Violence Act: Insights from Shome v. Danani

Concurrent Jurisdiction and Additional Monetary Relief under the Domestic Violence Act: Insights from Shome v. Danani

Date: Apr 12, 2019
Concurrent Jurisdiction and Additional Monetary Relief under the Domestic Violence Act: Insights from Shome Nikhil Danani v. Tanya Banon Danani Introduction The case of Shome Nikhil Danani v. Tanya...
Affirmation of OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights Over State Admission Regulations – Pranav V. Deshpande v. State of Karnataka

Affirmation of OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights Over State Admission Regulations – Pranav V. Deshpande v. State of Karnataka

Date: Apr 11, 2019
Affirmation of OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights Over State Admission Regulations Introduction The case of Pranav V. Deshpande v. State of Karnataka, adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert