Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Patna High Court Confirms Amendments to Section 45 PMLA 2002 Do Not Reaffirm Unconstitutional Bail Conditions

Patna High Court Confirms Amendments to Section 45 PMLA 2002 Do Not Reaffirm Unconstitutional Bail Conditions

Date: May 29, 2020
Patna High Court Confirms Amendments to Section 45 PMLA 2002 Do Not Reaffirm Unconstitutional Bail Conditions Introduction The case of Ahilya Devi v. State Of Bihar And Others Opposite Parties was...
High Court Upholds Special Leave Requirement for Complainants Appealing Acquittals Under Section 378(4) CrPC

High Court Upholds Special Leave Requirement for Complainants Appealing Acquittals Under Section 378(4) CrPC

Date: May 29, 2020
High Court Upholds Special Leave Requirement for Complainants Appealing Acquittals Under Section 378(4) CrPC Introduction The case of K. Rajalingam In Both Appeals v. R. Suganthalakshmi In Both...
Financial Capacity Not a Prerequisite for Bona Fide Need under Section 21(a) of Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act: Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision in Rajendra Kumar And Others v. Raj Kumar

Financial Capacity Not a Prerequisite for Bona Fide Need under Section 21(a) of Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act: Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision in Rajendra Kumar And Others v. Raj Kumar

Date: May 27, 2020
Financial Capacity Not a Prerequisite for Bona Fide Need under Section 21(a) of Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act: Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision in Rajendra Kumar And Others v. Raj Kumar...
Delhi High Court Upholds Descriptive Nature of 'TCV' in Bharat Biotech v. Optival Health Solutions

Delhi High Court Upholds Descriptive Nature of 'TCV' in Bharat Biotech v. Optival Health Solutions

Date: May 27, 2020
Delhi High Court Upholds Descriptive Nature of 'TCV' in Bharat Biotech v. Optival Health Solutions Introduction The case of Bharat Biotech International Ltd. v. Optival Health Solutions Pvt. Ltd. was...
Enforceability of Maintenance after Divorce: Sanjay Damodar Kale v. Kalyani Sanjay Kale

Enforceability of Maintenance after Divorce: Sanjay Damodar Kale v. Kalyani Sanjay Kale

Date: May 27, 2020
Enforceability of Maintenance after Divorce: Sanjay Damodar Kale v. Kalyani Sanjay Kale Introduction The case of Sanjay Damodar Kale v. Kalyani Sanjay Kale adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on May...
Non-Applicability of Force Majeure in Tenancy Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Ramanand v. Soni

Non-Applicability of Force Majeure in Tenancy Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Ramanand v. Soni

Date: May 22, 2020
Non-Applicability of Force Majeure in Tenancy Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Ramanand v. Soni Introduction The case of Ramanand And Others v. Dr. Girish Soni And Another, adjudicated by the Delhi High...
Clarifying the Application of Sections 489B and 489C IPC in Possession of Counterfeit Currency

Clarifying the Application of Sections 489B and 489C IPC in Possession of Counterfeit Currency

Date: May 21, 2020
Clarifying the Application of Sections 489B and 489C IPC in Possession of Counterfeit Currency Introduction The judgment in Muhammed Koya And Another v. State Of Kerala, delivered by the Kerala High...
Administrative Overreach in Temple Management: Karnataka High Court Upholds Hereditary Trustees’ Rights

Administrative Overreach in Temple Management: Karnataka High Court Upholds Hereditary Trustees’ Rights

Date: May 21, 2020
Administrative Overreach in Temple Management: Karnataka High Court Upholds Hereditary Trustees’ Rights Introduction The case of Sri Channakeshavaswamy Temple v. The Commissioner for Hindu Religious...
Enhancing Land Ceiling Regulations: Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision in Ram Chandra v. U.P. State Through Collector And Others

Enhancing Land Ceiling Regulations: Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision in Ram Chandra v. U.P. State Through Collector And Others

Date: May 20, 2020
Enhancing Land Ceiling Regulations: Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision in Ram Chandra v. U.P. State Through Collector And Others Introduction The case of Ram Chandra v. U.P. State Through...
Kerala High Court Clarifies Criteria for Impleading Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC in Rajeevan P.C. v. Deputy Commissioner

Kerala High Court Clarifies Criteria for Impleading Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC in Rajeevan P.C. v. Deputy Commissioner

Date: May 20, 2020
Kerala High Court Clarifies Criteria for Impleading Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC in Rajeevan P.C. v. Deputy Commissioner Introduction The case of Rajeevan P.C. And Anothers v. Deputy Commissioner And...
Harmonizing Admiralty Jurisdiction with Insolvency Law: Raj Shipping Agencies v. Barge Madhwa

Harmonizing Admiralty Jurisdiction with Insolvency Law: Raj Shipping Agencies v. Barge Madhwa

Date: May 20, 2020
Harmonizing Admiralty Jurisdiction with Insolvency Law: Raj Shipping Agencies v. Barge Madhwa Introduction Raj Shipping Agencies, acting as Plaintiff, initiated multiple Admiralty Suits against Barge...
Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent on Recovery of Voluntary Payments in Matrimonial Disputes

Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent on Recovery of Voluntary Payments in Matrimonial Disputes

Date: May 20, 2020
Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent on Recovery of Voluntary Payments in Matrimonial Disputes Introduction The case of Royson Mathew v. Minimol K. And Another /S., adjudicated by the Kerala High...
Secured Creditors Under SARFAESI Act Have Priority Over Statutory Charge Holders: Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent

Secured Creditors Under SARFAESI Act Have Priority Over Statutory Charge Holders: Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent

Date: May 20, 2020
Secured Creditors Under SARFAESI Act Have Priority Over Statutory Charge Holders: Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent Introduction The Kerala High Court, in the case of Travancore Devaswom Board,...
Kerala High Court's Landmark Clarification on Section 451 Cr.P.C. for Interim Release of Property

Kerala High Court's Landmark Clarification on Section 451 Cr.P.C. for Interim Release of Property

Date: May 20, 2020
Kerala High Court's Landmark Clarification on Section 451 Cr.P.C. for Interim Release of Property Introduction The case of V. Suresh Serve v. State of Kerala addressed pivotal questions regarding the...
Broad Interpretation of Rule 27 in ITAT Appeals: SANJAY SAWHNEY v. PCCIT

Broad Interpretation of Rule 27 in ITAT Appeals: SANJAY SAWHNEY v. PCCIT

Date: May 19, 2020
Broad Interpretation of Rule 27 in ITAT Appeals: SANJAY SAWHNEY v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The case of Sanjay Sawhney v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax adjudicated by...
SARFAESI Act: Statutory Deposit Calculation Excludes Future Interest - Shri Mohan Products Pvt. Ltd. v. SBI

SARFAESI Act: Statutory Deposit Calculation Excludes Future Interest - Shri Mohan Products Pvt. Ltd. v. SBI

Date: May 19, 2020
SARFAESI Act: Statutory Deposit Calculation Excludes Future Interest - Shri Mohan Products Pvt. Ltd. v. SBI Introduction The case of Shri Mohan Products Pvt. Ltd. And Others v. State Bank Of India...
Reaffirmation of Pay and Recover Principle under Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act – New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Yallavva

Reaffirmation of Pay and Recover Principle under Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act – New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Yallavva

Date: May 13, 2020
Reaffirmation of Pay and Recover Principle under Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Yallavva And Another Court: Karnataka High Court Date: May 12, 2020 Introduction The...
Maintainability of Anticipatory Bail Applications under Section 438 CrPC in Cases Involving Absconder Declarations

Maintainability of Anticipatory Bail Applications under Section 438 CrPC in Cases Involving Absconder Declarations

Date: May 13, 2020
Maintainability of Anticipatory Bail Applications under Section 438 CrPC in Cases Involving Absconder Declarations Introduction The case of Balveer Singh Bundela v. State of Madhya Pradesh...
Delhi High Court Establishes Limits on Interim Relief in International Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Delhi High Court Establishes Limits on Interim Relief in International Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Date: May 13, 2020
Delhi High Court Establishes Limits on Interim Relief in International Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Introduction The case of Mr. Ashwani Minda ANR v....
Madras High Court Reinforces Extended Investigation Period Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

Madras High Court Reinforces Extended Investigation Period Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

Date: May 12, 2020
Madras High Court Reinforces Extended Investigation Period Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. Amid COVID-19 Pandemic Introduction In the landmark case of S. Kasi Petitioner/Accused No. 3 v. State, Through...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert