1
2025:CGHC:12094
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 1989 of 2025
Amrika Bai W/o Devprasad Aged About 46 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Bandora, Police Chowki Adbhar, Police Station Malkharauda, District Sakti, Chhattisgarh.
... Applicant versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Chowki Adbhar, Police Station Malkharauda, District Sakti, Chhattisgarh.
... Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board
11.03.2025
1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as she has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 31/2025, registered at Police Chowki Adbhar, Police Station :
Malkharauda, District- Sakti, (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act.
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the police of Police Chowki Adbhar, Police Station : Malkharauda, District- Sakti,
RAHUL
DEWANGAN
Digitally signed by
RAHUL
DEWANGAN
2
(C.G.), received an information from the informant and on the basis of the said information conducted a raid and seized 10 bulk liters of country made liquor from the possession of the present applicant. Thereafter, Police has registered an offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act against the present applicant.
3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the present applicant has 03 criminal antecedents, out of which, she has already been acquitted in two cases, and only 01 case is pending under the Excise Act. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years, and the applicant is in jail since 31.01.2025 and the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays grant of bail to the applicant.
4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court. He submits that the present applicant has 03 criminal antecedents, which shows that the applicant is habitual offender. He further submits that from the possession of the present applicant 10 bulk liters of country made liquor was seized, therefore, she is not entitled for grant of bail.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case- diary.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and
3
the fact that the present applicant has 03 criminal antecedents, out of which, she has already been acquitted in two cases, and only 01 case is pending under the Excise Act, which was explained in this bail application in para 4(a), and further considering the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court and she is in jail since 31.01.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, therefore, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the present applicant.
7. Let the applicant, Amrika Bai, involved in Crime No. 31/2025, registered at Police Chowki Adbhar, Police Station : Malkharauda, District- Sakti, (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through her counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against her under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail
4
during trial and in order to secure her presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against her, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her in accordance with law.
8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith.
Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan
Comments