Union Of India And Others v. Bombay Tyres International (P) Ltd. ., Supreme Court Of India, Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Neutral Citations

1983 INSC 148

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Case Number

Civil Appeals Nos. 2269 of 1980, 2619 of 1977, 1097 of 1981 and 1244 of 1977 with SLP No. 6883 of 1981, CAs Nos. 1313 of 1981, 1373-76 of 1976, 307-10 of 1978, 885-90 of 1977, SLPs Nos. 4851-64 of 1977, CAs Nos. 569, 3330 of 1981, 1136 of 1977, 55-62 of 1979, 3319-20 of 1980, SLPs Nos. 4041, 6410 of 1981, 4019-20 of 1977, CAs Nos. 683-86 of 1977, 1723-26 of 1981, SLP No. 4588 of 1977, CAs Nos. 3262 of 1979, 428, 3509 of 1982, SLPs Nos. 5638 of 1979, 3972 of 1978, 6416 of 1981 and 9789 of 1980, CAs Nos. 1062-64 of 1977, 2642-50 of 1978, SLPs Nos. 6977 of 1981, CAs Nos. 642-45 of 1982, SLPs Nos. 6772 of 1981, CAs Nos. 736, 2458, 2460-61 of 1982, TCs Nos. 25 to 28, 18-19 of 1983, 79 to 83 of 1982, WPs Nos. 400 of 1977, 1685-91 of 1979, SLP No. 10794 of 1982, 4020 of 1976, CAs Nos. 1285 of 1976, 1307 of 1977, 50 of 1978, 2808 of 1979, 388, 1773 of 1981, 168, 3479 of 1982, SLP No. 2864 of 1981, CAs Nos. 1233-42 of 1981, 261, 502, 3214, 10198-200, 10202, 10204-06 of 1983, SLP (C) No. 6841 of 1982 and CA No. 2796 of 1979, decided on November 14/15, 1983

Disposition

Attorney(S)

Judges

Justice Amarendra Nath Sen
Justice P.N. Bhagwati
Justice Ranganath Misra

Acts

relevant provisions of taxing statutes/rules
Section 5, Subsection 2 of the 1983 Income Tax Act

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The opinion is an order dealing with multiple procedural and post-judgment matters. It records that SLP Civil No. 6841 of 1982 was dismissed insofar as it was directed only against an interlocutory order, and that CA No. 2796 of 1979 was stated to have already been disposed of. The order further notes that, after additional arguments on specific matters where the Court’s judgment dated 7-10-1983 was not specific, the Court issued clarifications relating to deductions from sale price/assessable value, and directed further listing of the matters on 18-11-1983 at 2 p.m.

Legal Issues Presented

What clarifications were required regarding the deductions to be allowed from the sale price (and related computation) in light of the Court’s judgment dated 7-10-1983 being non-specific on certain matters?
How should trade discounts, specified taxes, and transit transport insurance be treated for purposes of deduction from the sale price/arriving at assessable value?
How should deductions be computed where a company has multiple factories and uniform depot pricing irrespective of identification of the producing factory?

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court stated that further arguments were addressed to it concerning specific matters on which its judgment dated 7-10-1983 was not specific. As a result, the Court issued a set of clarifications, framed as operative directions:

Trade discounts: Discounts allowed in the trade (by whatever name described) are to be permitted as deductions from the sale price having regard to the nature of the goods, provided such discounts are established under agreements, terms of sale, or established practice, and provided that the allowance and nature of the discount are known at or prior to the removal of the goods. The Court clarified that such trade discounts are not to be disallowed merely because they are not payable at the time of each invoice or deducted from the invoice price.
Taxes: Additional sales tax, surcharge on sales tax, and turnover tax are to be allowed as deductions from the sale price to arrive at the assessable value. Octroi is also deductible where payable/paid by the manufacturer. The Court directed that if these taxes are proved to have been paid, they should be allowed even when paid periodically to the relevant authorities under the applicable taxing statutes/rules.
Insurance as part of transportation cost: The Court clarified that the “cost of insurance” mentioned in the earlier judgment (as part of transportation cost deductible) refers specifically to transit transport insurance covering transportation from the factory gate to the place(s) of delivery.
Multiple factories and depot pricing: Where a company has more than one factory in different locations and the depot price is the same irrespective of the inability to identify goods as originating from a particular factory, the deductions (as set out in the judgment and explained in this order) are to be computed and allowed on the basis of such depot price.

The Court expressly stated that the present order is by way of clarification of the judgment delivered on 7-10-1983 and further directed that the matters be listed for hearing on 18-11-1983 at 2 p.m.

Holding and Implications

DISMISSED (IN PART): SLP Civil No. 6841 of 1982 was dismissed insofar as it was directed against the interlocutory order only.

RECORDED AS ALREADY DISPOSED OF: CA No. 2796 of 1979 was stated to have already been disposed of.

CLARIFICATION ORDER PASSED: The Court issued clarifications to its judgment dated 7-10-1983 on the deductibility of (i) trade discounts, (ii) specified taxes including octroi (where payable/paid by the manufacturer), (iii) transit transport insurance within transportation cost, and (iv) computation of deductions in multi-factory situations with uniform depot pricing. The direct effect is to guide how deductions are to be allowed and computed under the framework of the earlier judgment. The opinion does not state any broader implications beyond these clarifications and the direction to list the matters for further hearing; no new precedent is expressly set out in the text.

Show full summary ...

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.