Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now

India Columns

A person accused of a heinous crime can't complain about violations of Article 21 when he himself isn't cooperating with the trial.

A person accused of a heinous crime can't complain about violations of Article 21 when he himself isn't cooperating with the trial.

Date: Jul 15, 2022
The Allahabad High Court in Suresh Yadav Opposite Party v/s State Of U.P. Thru Addl.Chief Secy Deptt. Home while denying bail to the accused applicant stated that the heinous crime accused can not...
Writ Maintainable, Arbitral Tribunal Framing An Issue That Was Already Decided During Interim Award

Writ Maintainable, Arbitral Tribunal Framing An Issue That Was Already Decided During Interim Award

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The High Court of Meghalaya has ruled that a writ petition can be filed against an arbitral tribunal ruling framing issue in a claim that has been completely settled in an interim award. The Single...
Non Filing of FIR doesn't make the case non-arbitrable

Non Filing of FIR doesn't make the case non-arbitrable

Date: Jul 14, 2022
After surrendering to the arbitrator's jurisdiction, the High Court of Delhi concluded that a party cannot challenge the arbitrator's jurisdiction based on the lack of an arbitration agreement. When...
Arbitrator Isn't Entitled To Allow Forfeiture Of A Significant Amount Of Money Without Proof Of Actual Loss

Arbitrator Isn't Entitled To Allow Forfeiture Of A Significant Amount Of Money Without Proof Of Actual Loss

Date: Jul 14, 2022
In the recent judgement of Rajesh Gupta v. Ram Avtar , the High Court of Delhi (High Court) partially set aside an arbitral award on the grounds that the sole arbitrator had incorrectly allowed...
The value of future interest will be factored into the total amount of the award.

The value of future interest will be factored into the total amount of the award.

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The Calcutta High Court has declared that the award of future or post-award interest is not advisory, but rather a requirement of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act), and that it...
Supreme Court gives pointers on the "presence of a dispute"

Supreme Court gives pointers on the "presence of a dispute"

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The Supreme Court has finally settled the long-debated topic of what constitutes "presence of a dispute" in the (Mobilox vs. Kirusa) decision. In the context of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,...
WhatsApp Message That Was "Forwarded As Received" Is Not Responsible For Unpublished Price Sensitive Information

WhatsApp Message That Was "Forwarded As Received" Is Not Responsible For Unpublished Price Sensitive Information

Date: Jul 14, 2022
Companies are consciously working to protect employee privacy while also safeguarding personal information. Nevertheless, innovative methods like end-to-end encrypted software are the newest attire...
The NCLT cannot force real estate project allocators into settlements holds SC

The NCLT cannot force real estate project allocators into settlements holds SC

Date: Jul 14, 2022
On a petition filed under section 7 of the IBC to begin the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the NCLT recently rejected the petition and ordered the corporate debtor to first settle the...
If an application is made in accordance with Section 7 of the IBC, Articles 137 of the Limitation Act will apply, and the 3-year limitation period will begin when the right to apply.

If an application is made in accordance with Section 7 of the IBC, Articles 137 of the Limitation Act will apply, and the 3-year limitation period will begin when the right to apply.

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The determination of the limitation period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was the subject of a ruling by the Supreme Court on September 18, 2019, in the case of Gaurav Hargovindbhai...
Whether a Bank can request police assistance under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 after the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act came to an end due to a compromise reached between the parties.

Whether a Bank can request police assistance under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 after the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act came to an end due to a compromise reached between the parties.

Date: Jul 14, 2022
According to Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter "IBC"), on the insolvency commencement date, the National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter "NCLT") must issue an...
Before starting bankruptcy proceedings against a corporate debtor, an operational creditor may employ a lawyer to serve him with a demand notice

Before starting bankruptcy proceedings against a corporate debtor, an operational creditor may employ a lawyer to serve him with a demand notice

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The Supreme court upheld the operational debtor's rights by applying a literal interpretation to section 9 of the Code's provision. In order to prevent depriving the Advocates of their right to...
Even though the harm caused by the conduct may continue, a wrongful act that results in a complete injury is not considered a continuing wrong for the purposes of Section 23 of the Limitation Act.

Even though the harm caused by the conduct may continue, a wrongful act that results in a complete injury is not considered a continuing wrong for the purposes of Section 23 of the Limitation Act.

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The Supreme Court reaffirmed that S. 23 does not refer to a continuing right but rather to a continuing wrong, which is an ongoing cause of harm that makes the person who committed the act...
NO PRE-ADMISSION ENQUIRY BY ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY REGARDING PROOF OF DEFAULT

NO PRE-ADMISSION ENQUIRY BY ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY REGARDING PROOF OF DEFAULT

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The Appellate Tribunal while analysing the Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) and the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court, held that I&B Code does not envisage a...
NCLAT Has No Jurisdiction To Condone Delay Exceeding The Prescribed Limitation Period Mentioned Under The Code.

NCLAT Has No Jurisdiction To Condone Delay Exceeding The Prescribed Limitation Period Mentioned Under The Code.

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of National Spot Exchange Ltd. Vs. Anil Kohli, Resolution Professional of Dunar Foods Limited has held that the NCLAT has no power to condone the delay (of more...
Mala Fide Intention as a Ground for Dismissal

Mala Fide Intention as a Ground for Dismissal

Date: Jul 14, 2022
NCLAT found that the case was filed collusively, not with the goal of resolving the insolvency, but for other reasons. As a result, admitting the Application to prevent the Corporate Debtor from...
The NCLT cannot force real estate project allocators into settlements holds SC

The NCLT cannot force real estate project allocators into settlements holds SC

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The New Okhla Industrial Development Authority claimed to be a Financial Creditor ("FC") based on the lease deed signed with the Developer Company, Shubhkamna Buildtech Private Limited , but this...
SC delineates the applicability of IBC law

SC delineates the applicability of IBC law

Date: Jul 14, 2022
For the purpose of determining the deadlines for using legal remedies given under various statutes, the Supreme Court has defined the interaction between the Limitation Act and other acts on a number...
High Court of Delhi: The arbitration clause in business contracts is nonetheless lawful even if stamp duty is not paid. It would therefore endure regardless of the actual contract.

High Court of Delhi: The arbitration clause in business contracts is nonetheless lawful even if stamp duty is not paid. It would therefore endure regardless of the actual contract.

Date: Jul 14, 2022
In accordance with the arbitration provision in the Memorandum of Understanding ("MoU") dated January 1, 2020 ("MoU") signed with MSD Telematics Pvt. Ltd. ("Respondent"), IMZ Corporate Pvt. Ltd....
Initializing CIRP against a Corporate Debtor with a foreign award is insufficient.

Initializing CIRP against a Corporate Debtor with a foreign award is insufficient.

Date: Jul 14, 2022
The NCLT in this case gave a significant judgement wherein it differentiated between domestic and foreign awards and whether a CIRP can be initiated against a Corporate Debtor who has been endowed...
Section 65-B of The Evidence Act, does not apply to arbitral procedures.

Section 65-B of The Evidence Act, does not apply to arbitral procedures.

Date: Jul 14, 2022
In the matter of Millennium School vs Pawan Dawar, the Delhi High Court's Single Bench, led by Justice Vibhu Bakhru, held that Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ("Evidence Act") does not...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert