Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
A student was recently awarded Rs. 10 lakh in compensation by the Madras High Court from Tamil Nadu Engineering Admissions for denying her entrance to the Architecture programme. The court further...
The Kerala High Court ruled that any dispute regarding whether a lawsuit fits under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.) must be resolved prior to the trial. The court stated that a...
The purpose of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is to allow a party to challenge the existence and legality of the arbitration agreement before the Arbitral Tribunal; as a result, the High...
Delhi High Court held that it is against the natural justice concept to physically inspect business locations for GST registration without first giving notice. In the instant case titled Curil...
Case Title: PCIT Versus Panchmukhi Management Services Pvt. Ltd. ITA 319/2022 The annual report and share certificate that was recovered from the assessee premises cannot be seen as incriminating...
The Rajasthan High Court in Mangal Das through LRS v. Amar Singh through LRS has observed that the basic object of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 1950 is to save the harassment of tenants from...
The Delhi High Court NEERAJ SHARMA v/s VINAY SHEEL SAXENA & ORS. observed that must not be allowed to be cut needlessly or wantonly. The Hon’ble Bench observed that “In this capital city with its...
Case Title: Star India Private Limited v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India The broadcasters were instructed by TDSAT to furnish information regarding how they stream live linear channels on...
The Delhi High Court in Drooshba Fabricators v. Indue Private Limited observed that non-payment or insufficiency of stamp duty on the underlying agreement cannot render the arbitration clause...
The Court in State of U.P. v. Sarvan and connected appeals confirmed the death penalty awarded to a man who committed the murder of his wife and children on account of an illicit relationship with...
The Delhi High Court in Hathkargah Laghu Patang Udyog Samiti (Reg.) v/s Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr. observed that a person engaged in kite flying cannot modify the kite flying thread to...
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act cannot be invoked just because the accused knew the victim's caste status, the Chhattisgarh High Court has reaffirmed. It was...
The Bombay High Court in Suresh @ Pintya Kashinath Kamble v/s The State of Maharashtra sentenced a convict to undergo a jail term of 10 years i.e., one-half of life imprisonment under the POCSO Act. ...
The Supreme Court in Chandrapal vs State of Chhattisgarh observed that an extra-judicial confession made could be admitted only as a corroborative piece of evidence. The Court held that...
The Bombay High Court instructed a public interest plaintiff seeking better POCSO Act enforcement to submit his recommendations to the High Court Committee on POCSO Matters. According to Section...
The Allahabad High Court in Re Ensuring the Security of Life and Safety of Health of the workmen and employees engaged v. The Chief Secretary, Government of U.P. Lucknow and others took suo moto...
According to the Bombay High Court, an employee who was thought to be suspended owing to criminal allegations is not entitled to back pay despite being cleared of all charges, as a deemed suspension...
The Karanataka High Court in Shadakshari C.L & others v Santhosha C.A & others. Observed that if the trial court has not given a clear finding regarding the possession of suit property, the appellate...
The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court have held that preventive detention orders may be issued even when a person is in police custody. The authority must, however, document strong...
The Bombay High Court in Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. versus Mohit Raghuram Hegde, Proprietor Creative Infotech observed that it is now a settled principle of law that a mere allegation of fraud...