Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Case Title: Rajesh Kumar V. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & ors. The Delhi High Court remarked in the aforementioned case that it is regrettable that the "apathy of authorities" is seeping through...
Case Title: Kushwinder Singhal v. Reena Tiwari The Hon'ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, principal bench, adjudicating in this case held that the committee of creditors has the...
Case Title: Safire Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & Anr The Supreme Court reiterated that an appeal against the order of NCLT shall be filed before the NCLAT within a...
Case Title: Pruthvirajsinh Bhagirathsinh Jadeja v. State Of Gujarat & 2 Other(s) The Gujarat High Court has reiterated that a lawyer who does not appear and plead before courts cannot designate...
Case Title: Relaxo Footwears Ltd v. Aqualite India Ltd & Anr. According to the Delhi High Court, a registered design's owner does not automatically lose that right because they have yet to take legal...
Case Title: State of Punjab v. Jasbir Singh The Supreme Court ruled that it is not required to allow a would-be-accused hearing before filing a complaint under Section 195/340 CrPC. The Three Judges...
Case Title: Babu V. State of U.P "No accused person is incapable of being reformed and therefore, all measures should be applied to give them an opportunity of reformation in order to bring them in...
Case Title: Harbhajan Singh v. State of Haryana and others The Supreme Court upheld the Haryana Sikh Gurudwara (Management) Act 2014 and dismissed petitions challenging the Act's constitutionality. A...
Case Title: State Bank of India v. Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited The Supreme Court observed that, “(i) The provisions of Section 18 of the Limitation Act are not alien to and are applicable to...
Case Title: Facebook India Online Services Private Limited v. CCIThe Delhi High Court rejected the appeal by Facebook India Online Services Private Limited contesting the Competition Commission of...
Case Title: Mohamed Ali v. V. Jaya The Supreme Court stated that when a statutory alternative remedy in the form of an appeal is available, a writ petition/Revision Petition under Article 227 of the...
Case Title: Employees Provident Fund Organisation v. Subodh Kumar Agarwal The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, principal bench adjudicating in this case requested the Ministry of Corporate...
Case Title: Pharmacy Council of India v. Rajeev College of Pharmacy And Ors. The Supreme Court ruled that the right to create an educational institution is a basic right under Article 19(1)(g) of...
Case Title: RE: FRAMING GUIDELINES REGARDING POTENTIAL MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED WHILE IMPOSING DEATH SENTENCES The question of whether the accused should be heard before receiving...
Case Title: Vag Educational Services v. Aakash Educational Services Ltd. The Delhi High Court has ruled that once the arbitral tribunal terminates the arbitration proceedings due to the claimant...
Case Title: X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt of NCT Of Delhi The Supreme Court observed that a woman does not need any consent from her family to terminate her...
Case Title: Ravi Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and anr After finding fault in High Court’s order, the Supreme Court restored acquittal of an accused in a murder case. In the aforementioned...
Case Title: Shravan Kumar Vishnoi v. Upma Jaiswal and Ors. The NCLAT observed that the Resolution Professional is not required to take a decision regarding the ineligibility of the Resolution...
Case Title: FMC Corporation V. The Controller of Patents According to the Delhi High Court, it is not possible to reopen the whole discussion in a patent application by the use of written submissions...
Case Title: Harekrushna Naik & Ors. v. State of Orissa The Orissa High Court upheld the conviction of three murder convicts ensuing life sentence awarded to them in a '22-year-old' case. The same...