Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

Limiting Perry: Vermont Supreme Court Holds That Due-Process Notice in Property-Tax Grievances Need Not Be Mailed to Counsel

Limiting Perry: Vermont Supreme Court Holds That Due-Process Notice in Property-Tax Grievances Need Not Be Mailed to Counsel

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Limiting Perry: Vermont Supreme Court Holds That Due-Process Notice in Property-Tax Grievances Need Not Be Mailed to Counsel Introduction Salisbury AD 1, LLC v. Town of Salisbury, 2025 VT 43,...
Voluntary Absence at Restitution Hearings Constitutes Waiver: Commentary on State v. Brittany L. Knight (Vt. 2025)

Voluntary Absence at Restitution Hearings Constitutes Waiver: Commentary on State v. Brittany L. Knight (Vt. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Voluntary Absence at Restitution Hearings Constitutes Waiver: An In-Depth Commentary on State v. Brittany L. Knight, Supreme Court of Vermont (2025) I. Introduction Background: Brittany L. Knight...
Clarifying the Bailey Balancing Test: Negligent Evidence Destruction without Gross Negligence Is Insufficient for Dismissal in Vermont

Clarifying the Bailey Balancing Test: Negligent Evidence Destruction without Gross Negligence Is Insufficient for Dismissal in Vermont

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying the Bailey Balancing Test: Negligent Evidence Destruction without Gross Negligence Is Insufficient for Dismissal in Vermont Introduction State v. Eric M. Champagne, decided by the Vermont...
State v. Burket: Refining Plain-Error Review of Jury Instructions and Narrowing Drug-Testing Conditions in Vermont Probation Law

State v. Burket: Refining Plain-Error Review of Jury Instructions and Narrowing Drug-Testing Conditions in Vermont Probation Law

Date: Aug 13, 2025
State v. Burket: Refining Plain-Error Review of Jury Instructions and Narrowing Drug-Testing Conditions in Vermont Probation Law 1. Introduction In State v. Kelly Burket, 2025 VT ___ (Aug. 8, 2025),...
Parties’ Agreed Life-Insurance Obligations Survive Beyond Death – A Commentary on diMonda v. Lincoln National Corp., 2025 VT 45

Parties’ Agreed Life-Insurance Obligations Survive Beyond Death – A Commentary on diMonda v. Lincoln National Corp., 2025 VT 45

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Parties’ Agreed Life-Insurance Obligations Survive Beyond Death – The Vermont Supreme Court Reconciles Postmortem Maintenance Restrictions with Contractual Autonomy Commentary on Victoria diMonda v....
Ricker v. Nebraska Methodist – Solidifying Nebraska Courts’ Inherent Power to Exclude Late-Disclosed Experts

Ricker v. Nebraska Methodist – Solidifying Nebraska Courts’ Inherent Power to Exclude Late-Disclosed Experts

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Ricker v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. Affirming Courts’ Inherent Authority to Enforce Progression Orders by Excluding Late-Disclosed Expert Testimony 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Extending Laches to Declaratory Quiet-Title Actions and Recognising Non-Party Prejudice: Commentary on Amerigold Holdings LLC v. Baker & Silverbow Mining LLC (Alaska 2025)

Extending Laches to Declaratory Quiet-Title Actions and Recognising Non-Party Prejudice: Commentary on Amerigold Holdings LLC v. Baker & Silverbow Mining LLC (Alaska 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Extending Laches to Declaratory Quiet-Title Actions and Recognising Non-Party Prejudice A Commentary on Amerigold Holdings LLC v. Douglas Baker & Silverbow Mining LLC, Supreme Court of Alaska,...
Explained: The New Obligation on Alaska Courts to Justify
            Non-Insurance Solutions When Survivor Benefits Are Jeopardized —
            A Commentary on Sandvik v. Frazier (Alaska 2025)

Explained: The New Obligation on Alaska Courts to Justify Non-Insurance Solutions When Survivor Benefits Are Jeopardized — A Commentary on Sandvik v. Frazier (Alaska 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Explained: The New Obligation on Alaska Courts to Justify Non-Insurance Solutions When Survivor Benefits Are Jeopardized — A Commentary on Sandvik v. Frazier (Alaska 2025) 1. Introduction Background....
“Consult First, Act Later” – Wisconsin Affirms the Attorney’s Duty to Communicate Directly with Adjudged-Incompetent Clients (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas L. Frenn, 2025)

“Consult First, Act Later” – Wisconsin Affirms the Attorney’s Duty to Communicate Directly with Adjudged-Incompetent Clients (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas L. Frenn, 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Consult First, Act Later” – Wisconsin Affirms the Attorney’s Duty to Communicate Directly with Adjudged-Incompetent Clients (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas L. Frenn, 2025 WI ___) Introduction...
A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment

A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment

Date: Aug 13, 2025
A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment Introduction In A Cab Series, LLC f/k/a A Cab, LLC v....
“Beyond the Sirens” – Armenta v. Unified Fire (2025) and the Narrowing of the UGIA’s “Emergency Medical Assistance” Immunity

“Beyond the Sirens” – Armenta v. Unified Fire (2025) and the Narrowing of the UGIA’s “Emergency Medical Assistance” Immunity

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Beyond the Sirens” – Armenta v. Unified Fire (2025) and the Narrowing of the UGIA’s “Emergency Medical Assistance” Immunity Supreme Court of Utah – 2025 UT 26 – Decided 7 Aug 2025 1. Introduction In...
Utah Supreme Court Affirms Surface Owner’s Right to Uncompensated On-Site Use of Soil in Severed Estates — Comment on Genesis Aggregates B v. Toll Southwest (2025 UT 28)

Utah Supreme Court Affirms Surface Owner’s Right to Uncompensated On-Site Use of Soil in Severed Estates — Comment on Genesis Aggregates B v. Toll Southwest (2025 UT 28)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Utah Supreme Court Affirms Surface Owner’s Right to Uncompensated On-Site Use of Soil in Severed Estates Commentary on Genesis Aggregates B v. Toll Southwest, 2025 UT 28 Introduction Genesis...
Municipal Incorporation and the Doctrine of Mootness in Land-Use Referendum Litigation: Commentary on Haney v. Tooele County (2025 UT 30)

Municipal Incorporation and the Doctrine of Mootness in Land-Use Referendum Litigation: Commentary on Haney v. Tooele County (2025 UT 30)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Municipal Incorporation and the Doctrine of Mootness in Land-Use Referendum Litigation: A Comprehensive Commentary on Haney v. Tooele County, 2025 UT 30 1. Introduction Haney v. Tooele County (2025...
Flexible Deference to Bar Admissions Decisions: The Utah Supreme Court’s Refined Standard of Review in Long v. Utah State Bar

Flexible Deference to Bar Admissions Decisions: The Utah Supreme Court’s Refined Standard of Review in Long v. Utah State Bar

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Flexible Deference” to Bar Admissions Decisions: The Utah Supreme Court’s Refined Standard of Review in Long v. Utah State Bar (2025 UT 29) Introduction Case name: Long v. Utah State Bar, 2025 UT 29...
The “Federal-Origin Exception” to Utah’s EIDPA Suppression Rule – A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Andrus (2025 UT 32)

The “Federal-Origin Exception” to Utah’s EIDPA Suppression Rule – A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Andrus (2025 UT 32)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
The “Federal-Origin Exception” to Utah’s EIDPA Suppression Rule In-Depth Commentary on State v. Andrus, 2025 UT 32 (Supreme Court of Utah) 1. Introduction State v. Andrus presented Utah’s high court...
Objective Imminence as a Law-Like Mixed Question: Correctness Review of Pre-Trial Justification Rulings in Utah

Objective Imminence as a Law-Like Mixed Question: Correctness Review of Pre-Trial Justification Rulings in Utah

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Objective Imminence as a Law-Like Mixed Question: Correctness Review of Pre-Trial Justification Rulings in Utah 1. Introduction State v. Wilcox, 2025 UT 31, is the Utah Supreme Court’s first...
Talisker v. Midtown Acquisitions: Utah Supreme Court Validates Broad Contractual Waivers of Rule 69B Sheriff’s-Sale Protections

Talisker v. Midtown Acquisitions: Utah Supreme Court Validates Broad Contractual Waivers of Rule 69B Sheriff’s-Sale Protections

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Talisker v. Midtown Acquisitions: Utah Supreme Court Validates Broad Contractual Waivers of Rule 69B Sheriff’s-Sale Protections Introduction Talisker Partnership and a constellation of related...
“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation

“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation Introduction In Kenneth R. Minshall v. Robin Griffin & Joy Osbon, 2025 WY 90,...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosures Introduction In The Bank of New York Mellon v. White, SCWC-21-0000400 (Aug. 7 2025), the Hawaiʻi Supreme...
Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures

Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures Introduction Smith v. Fontes, decided by the Arizona Supreme Court on 6...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert