Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

restricting-general-jurisdiction:-second-circuit&amp Case Commentaries

Affirming Major Upward Variances to the Statutory Maximum: Deference to § 3553(a) Balancing and No Duty to Address Hypothetical Guideline Ranges for Dismissed Counts

Affirming Major Upward Variances to the Statutory Maximum: Deference to § 3553(a) Balancing and No Duty to Address Hypothetical Guideline Ranges for Dismissed Counts

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Affirming Major Upward Variances to the Statutory Maximum: Deference to § 3553(a) Balancing and No Duty to Address Hypothetical Guideline Ranges for Dismissed Counts Introduction In United States v....
No “Last-Exposure” Liability for Former Self-Insured Parents Under the BLBA: Fourth Circuit Limits Responsible-Operator and Carrier Designations; Trust Fund Pays When § 725.494(e) Is Not Met

No “Last-Exposure” Liability for Former Self-Insured Parents Under the BLBA: Fourth Circuit Limits Responsible-Operator and Carrier Designations; Trust Fund Pays When § 725.494(e) Is Not Met

Date: Oct 4, 2025
No “Last-Exposure” Liability for Former Self-Insured Parents Under the BLBA Fourth Circuit limits responsible-operator and carrier designations; Trust Fund must pay where § 725.494(e) is not...
Pleading-Stage Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals and No Tolling by Kansas § 12-105b for § 1983 Claims: Boldridge v. City of Atchison (10th Cir. 2025)

Pleading-Stage Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals and No Tolling by Kansas § 12-105b for § 1983 Claims: Boldridge v. City of Atchison (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Pleading-Stage Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals and No Tolling by Kansas § 12-105b for § 1983 Claims: Boldridge v. City of Atchison (10th Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court of Appeals for the...
No Standing Without Specific Plans and Redressability Amid Overlapping Firearm Bans: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Springer v. Grisham

No Standing Without Specific Plans and Redressability Amid Overlapping Firearm Bans: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Springer v. Grisham

Date: Oct 4, 2025
No Standing Without Specific Plans and Redressability Amid Overlapping Firearm Bans: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Springer v. Grisham Springer v. Grisham, Nos. 23-2192 & 23-2194 (10th Cir. Oct. 1,...
Concrete Plans and Overlapping Laws: Tenth Circuit Tightens Pre‑Enforcement Standing in Second Amendment Challenges

Concrete Plans and Overlapping Laws: Tenth Circuit Tightens Pre‑Enforcement Standing in Second Amendment Challenges

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Concrete Plans and Overlapping Laws: Tenth Circuit Tightens Pre‑Enforcement Standing in Second Amendment Challenges Introduction In Springer v. Grisham, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Intrinsic Evidence and VICAR Motive: The Tenth Circuit’s DeLeon Decision Clarifies Preservation Duties, Admissibility of Gang-Violence Context, and Reviewability of Rule 37 Denials

Intrinsic Evidence and VICAR Motive: The Tenth Circuit’s DeLeon Decision Clarifies Preservation Duties, Admissibility of Gang-Violence Context, and Reviewability of Rule 37 Denials

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Intrinsic Evidence and VICAR Motive: The Tenth Circuit’s DeLeon Decision Clarifies Preservation Duties, Admissibility of Gang-Violence Context, and Reviewability of Rule 37 Denials Introduction In...
No TWDA End-Run via Official-Capacity Pleading; Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Subjective Deliberate-Indifference Standard for Pretrial Detainee Medical Care

No TWDA End-Run via Official-Capacity Pleading; Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Subjective Deliberate-Indifference Standard for Pretrial Detainee Medical Care

Date: Oct 3, 2025
No TWDA End-Run via Official-Capacity Pleading; Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Subjective Deliberate-Indifference Standard for Pretrial Detainee Medical Care Court: United States Court of Appeals for the...
FEGLIA “Receipt” Defined: Delivery to Employing-Office Personnel Suffices; No Indicia-of-Receipt or File-Presence Requirement (Metropolitan v. Vasquez, 5th Cir. 2025)

FEGLIA “Receipt” Defined: Delivery to Employing-Office Personnel Suffices; No Indicia-of-Receipt or File-Presence Requirement (Metropolitan v. Vasquez, 5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 3, 2025
FEGLIA “Receipt” Defined: Delivery to Employing-Office Personnel Suffices; No Indicia-of-Receipt or File-Presence Requirement Case: Metropolitan v. Vasquez, No. 24-11024 (5th Cir. Oct. 1, 2025) (per...
Reaffirming the Post-Ruan, Post-Burrage Framework: No Proximate Cause or Mens Rea for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results”; Miranda Errors May Be Harmless

Reaffirming the Post-Ruan, Post-Burrage Framework: No Proximate Cause or Mens Rea for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results”; Miranda Errors May Be Harmless

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Reaffirming the Post-Ruan, Post-Burrage Framework: No Proximate Cause or Mens Rea for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results”; Miranda Errors May Be Harmless Introduction This nonprecedential Third Circuit...
Third Circuit Endorses the “Integral Use of Fire” Standard for 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(1) in Insurance-Fraud Schemes: United States v. Randolph

Third Circuit Endorses the “Integral Use of Fire” Standard for 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(1) in Insurance-Fraud Schemes: United States v. Randolph

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Third Circuit Endorses the “Integral Use of Fire” Standard for 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(1) in Insurance-Fraud Schemes: United States v. Randolph Decision: United States v. Lashaumba O. Randolph, No....
Strict Liability Persists for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results” After Ruan; No Need to Identify the Specific Fatal Bag When All Sources Trace to Defendants

Strict Liability Persists for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results” After Ruan; No Need to Identify the Specific Fatal Bag When All Sources Trace to Defendants

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Strict Liability Persists for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results” After Ruan; No Need to Identify the Specific Fatal Bag When All Sources Trace to Defendants United States v. Jeremy Edward Johnson; United...
No Constructive Notice from Tracks Alone: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Mississippi’s Temporal Proof Requirement in Slip‑and‑Fall Cases

No Constructive Notice from Tracks Alone: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Mississippi’s Temporal Proof Requirement in Slip‑and‑Fall Cases

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Constructive Notice from Tracks Alone: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Mississippi’s Temporal Proof Requirement in Slip‑and‑Fall Cases Introduction In Harrison v. Houchens Food Group, the United States...
“Actual Knowledge” Means an Actual Inference: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Pleading for K–12 Title IX Liability in Monroe v. Aldine ISD

“Actual Knowledge” Means an Actual Inference: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Pleading for K–12 Title IX Liability in Monroe v. Aldine ISD

Date: Oct 2, 2025
“Actual Knowledge” Means an Actual Inference: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Pleading for K–12 Title IX Liability in Monroe v. Aldine ISD Introduction In an unpublished per curiam decision, the...
No Heightened Review Without an Arguable Limitations Bar: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal of a Post-Conviction Rule 41(g) Property-Return Action

No Heightened Review Without an Arguable Limitations Bar: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal of a Post-Conviction Rule 41(g) Property-Return Action

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Heightened Review Without an Arguable Limitations Bar: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal of a Post-Conviction Rule 41(g) Property-Return Action Introduction In Sanusi v. United States,...
No Free Appellate Stay: Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms Conversion Where Chapter 11 Was Used to Avoid a Supersedeas Bond Absent Immediate Financial Distress

No Free Appellate Stay: Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms Conversion Where Chapter 11 Was Used to Avoid a Supersedeas Bond Absent Immediate Financial Distress

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Free Appellate Stay: Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms Conversion Where Chapter 11 Was Used to Avoid a Supersedeas Bond Absent Immediate Financial Distress Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth...
Ivey v. Tuggle: State‑Law Attacks on Prison Administrative Reclassification and 85% Credit Eligibility Are Not Cognizable Under § 2241

Ivey v. Tuggle: State‑Law Attacks on Prison Administrative Reclassification and 85% Credit Eligibility Are Not Cognizable Under § 2241

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Ivey v. Tuggle: State‑Law Attacks on Prison Administrative Reclassification and 85% Credit Eligibility Are Not Cognizable Under § 2241 Introduction In Ivey v. Tuggle, No. 25-7049 (10th Cir. Sept. 30,...
Private Resort to Courts Is Not “State Action”: Tenth Circuit Affirms § 1983 Dismissal and Clarifies Post–Rule 59(e) Appellate Requirements in Pollak v. Strong

Private Resort to Courts Is Not “State Action”: Tenth Circuit Affirms § 1983 Dismissal and Clarifies Post–Rule 59(e) Appellate Requirements in Pollak v. Strong

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Private Resort to Courts Is Not “State Action”: Tenth Circuit Affirms § 1983 Dismissal and Clarifies Post–Rule 59(e) Appellate Requirements in Pollak v. Strong Court: United States Court of Appeals...
Neutral, Generally Applicable Funding Conditions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado’s UPK Nondiscrimination Rule and Limits Expressive Association in Preschool Admissions

Neutral, Generally Applicable Funding Conditions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado’s UPK Nondiscrimination Rule and Limits Expressive Association in Preschool Admissions

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Neutral, Generally Applicable Funding Conditions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado’s UPK Nondiscrimination Rule and Limits Expressive Association in Preschool Admissions Introduction In St. Mary...
Reckless-Force Robbery and the ACCA: Tenth Circuit Declares Oklahoma Armed Robbery Not a “Violent Felony” Under § 924(e)(2)(B)(i)

Reckless-Force Robbery and the ACCA: Tenth Circuit Declares Oklahoma Armed Robbery Not a “Violent Felony” Under § 924(e)(2)(B)(i)

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Reckless-Force Robbery and the ACCA: Tenth Circuit Declares Oklahoma Armed Robbery Not a “Violent Felony” Under § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) Introduction In United States v. Campbell (10th Cir. Sept. 30, 2025),...
McCane Still Controls After Rahimi: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality and Clarifies Preservation When the District Court Acts Sua Sponte

McCane Still Controls After Rahimi: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality and Clarifies Preservation When the District Court Acts Sua Sponte

Date: Oct 2, 2025
McCane Still Controls After Rahimi: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality and Clarifies Preservation When the District Court Acts Sua Sponte Introduction In United States v. Forbis...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert