Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

comprehensive-interpretation-of-& Case Commentaries

“Beyond the Six-Month Benchmark” – The Malloy Standard for Progressive Escalation of Attorney Discipline in Wisconsin

“Beyond the Six-Month Benchmark” – The Malloy Standard for Progressive Escalation of Attorney Discipline in Wisconsin

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Beyond the Six-Month Benchmark” – The Malloy Standard for Progressive Escalation of Attorney Discipline in Wisconsin 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. Malloy, 2025 WI 39, is...
Forged Witness Signatures and the Threshold for Revocation: The Wisconsin
Supreme Court Establishes a 30-Month Suspension Standard

Forged Witness Signatures and the Threshold for Revocation: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes a 30-Month Suspension Standard

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Forged Witness Signatures and the Threshold for Revocation: A Commentary on Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John P. Buran, 2025 WI 40 1. Introduction In Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John P. Buran,...
Armed Pedestrian Flight as “Substantial Risk”: A Commentary on Virgil Lee Evans, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Armed Pedestrian Flight as “Substantial Risk”: A Commentary on Virgil Lee Evans, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Armed Pedestrian Flight as “Substantial Risk”: The Supreme Court of Kentucky Clarifies KRS 520.095 in Evans v. Commonwealth 1. Introduction In Virgil Lee Evans, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Sup....
Reaffirming Rehabilitative Admission of Post-Motive Child CAC Statements and Present-Sense Police Commentary: An Analysis of Mario S. Smith v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Reaffirming Rehabilitative Admission of Post-Motive Child CAC Statements and Present-Sense Police Commentary: An Analysis of Mario S. Smith v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Reaffirming Rehabilitative Admission of Post-Motive Child CAC Statements and Present-Sense Police Commentary: An Analysis of Mario S. Smith v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction The Supreme Court...
Arbitration Agreements Are Not “Health-Care Decisions”: The Kentucky Supreme Court Narrows KRS 311.631 Spousal Authority

Arbitration Agreements Are Not “Health-Care Decisions”: The Kentucky Supreme Court Narrows KRS 311.631 Spousal Authority

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Arbitration Agreements Are Not “Health-Care Decisions”: The Kentucky Supreme Court Narrows KRS 311.631 Spousal Authority Introduction In Lexington Alzheimer’s Investors, LLC d/b/a The Lantern at...
The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H.

The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H. Introduction This commentary examines...
Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci

Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci Case: Matter of Markey v. Tietz, 2025 NY...
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief

Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief Introduction In Matter of Common Cause...
“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment

“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment 1. Introduction K.S. v. M.D. and M.F.D. is the Mississippi Supreme Court’s most...
“Look-but-Don’t-Intimidate”:  Simpson v. Commonwealth and the Permissible Use of Courtroom Barriers Consistent with the Confrontation Clause

“Look-but-Don’t-Intimidate”: Simpson v. Commonwealth and the Permissible Use of Courtroom Barriers Consistent with the Confrontation Clause

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Look-but-Don’t-Intimidate”: Simpson v. Commonwealth and the Permissible Use of Courtroom Barriers Consistent with the Confrontation Clause 1. Introduction Jamie Simpson appealed his 60-year sentence...
“Ross–Haydon Bridge Reconciliation Rule”: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Sovereign-Immunity Limits on Refund Suits Against the State

“Ross–Haydon Bridge Reconciliation Rule”: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Sovereign-Immunity Limits on Refund Suits Against the State

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Ross–Haydon Bridge Reconciliation Rule” Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Sovereign-Immunity Limits on Monetary Relief and Refund Actions Introduction On 14 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Kentucky...
“Due vs. Never-Due” Refunds: The Kentucky Supreme Court Re-draws the Sovereign-Immunity Line in Long v. Commonwealth (2025)

“Due vs. Never-Due” Refunds: The Kentucky Supreme Court Re-draws the Sovereign-Immunity Line in Long v. Commonwealth (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Due vs. Never-Due” Refunds: The Kentucky Supreme Court Re-draws the Sovereign-Immunity Line Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Revenue v. Long (2025) Introduction The consolidated decision in...
“Party-Affiliation ≠ State Action” – The Second Circuit’s Re-confirmation of the State-Actor Requirement in Sherpa v. Bondi

“Party-Affiliation ≠ State Action” – The Second Circuit’s Re-confirmation of the State-Actor Requirement in Sherpa v. Bondi

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Party-Affiliation ≠ State Action” – The Second Circuit’s Re-confirmation of the State-Actor Requirement in Sherpa v. Bondi 1. Introduction Sherpa v. Bondi, No. 23-6172 (2d Cir. Aug. 14 2025) is a...
“Never‐Due” v. “Due” Funds – The Kentucky Supreme Court’s New Two-Tier Rule for Sovereign Immunity Refund Actions

“Never‐Due” v. “Due” Funds – The Kentucky Supreme Court’s New Two-Tier Rule for Sovereign Immunity Refund Actions

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Never-Due” v. “Due” Funds – A Commentary on Long v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Revenue (Ky. 2025) 1 · Introduction On 14 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Kentucky issued a consolidated...
Scarborough Refined: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Strickland-Prejudice Analysis for Missed Plea-Withdrawal Motions

Scarborough Refined: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Strickland-Prejudice Analysis for Missed Plea-Withdrawal Motions

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Scarborough Refined: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Strickland-Prejudice Analysis for Missed Plea-Withdrawal Motions Introduction In Smith v. State, No. 179, 2024 (Del. Aug. 14, 2025), the Supreme...
Enhanced Disclosure & Gate-Keeping Standards for Historic Cell-Site Evidence: Analysis of Shawn Hollingsworth, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Enhanced Disclosure & Gate-Keeping Standards for Historic Cell-Site Evidence: Analysis of Shawn Hollingsworth, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Enhanced Disclosure & Gate-Keeping Standards for Historic Cell-Site Evidence: Commentary on Shawn Hollingsworth, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Supreme Court of Kentucky (2025) Introduction The...
“Never-Due” Funds and the Limits of Sovereign Immunity: A Commentary on Long v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

“Never-Due” Funds and the Limits of Sovereign Immunity: A Commentary on Long v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Never-Due” Funds and the Limits of Sovereign Immunity: A Structured Commentary on Long v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s consolidated decision in...
“The Reach of Waiver” – How Express Agreement Forecloses Appellate Review in Kentucky: A Commentary on Kenny Dile, Jr. v. Commonwealth

“The Reach of Waiver” – How Express Agreement Forecloses Appellate Review in Kentucky: A Commentary on Kenny Dile, Jr. v. Commonwealth

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“The Reach of Waiver” – How Express Agreement Forecloses Appellate Review in Kentucky: A Structured Commentary on Kenny Dile, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. Sup. Ct., Aug. 14 2025) 1....
“Stacked-Probabilities” and the Preliminary Injunction: The Fourth Circuit’s New Multiplicative-Likelihood Doctrine in American Federation of Teachers v. Bessent

“Stacked-Probabilities” and the Preliminary Injunction: The Fourth Circuit’s New Multiplicative-Likelihood Doctrine in American Federation of Teachers v. Bessent

Date: Aug 14, 2025
“Stacked-Probabilities” and the Preliminary Injunction: The Fourth Circuit’s New Multiplicative-Likelihood Doctrine in American Federation of Teachers v. Bessent 1. Introduction On 12 August 2025 the...
“Ratification Trumps Procedure” – Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Homeowners May Cure an Unauthorized Referendum by Subsequent Vote

“Ratification Trumps Procedure” – Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Homeowners May Cure an Unauthorized Referendum by Subsequent Vote

Date: Aug 14, 2025
“Ratification Trumps Procedure” – Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Homeowners May Cure an Unauthorized Referendum by Subsequent Vote 1. Introduction In Jill K. Jinks v. Community Services Associates...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert