Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Counihan v. State of Wisconsin: Non-Forfeiture of Due Process Challenges for Sentencing Information

Counihan v. State of Wisconsin: Non-Forfeiture of Due Process Challenges for Sentencing Information

Date: Feb 14, 2020
Counihan v. State of Wisconsin: Non-Forfeiture of Due Process Challenges for Sentencing Information Introduction State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Carrie E. Counihan,...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Involuntary Commitment Standards: D.K. vs. Marathon County

Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Involuntary Commitment Standards: D.K. vs. Marathon County

Date: Feb 5, 2020
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Involuntary Commitment Standards: D.K. vs. Marathon County A Comprehensive Analysis of the 2020 Supreme Court Decision Setting New Precedents in Civil Commitment...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Bar Statutory Misrepresentation Claims Under §100.18

Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Bar Statutory Misrepresentation Claims Under §100.18

Date: Jan 10, 2020
Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Bar Statutory Misrepresentation Claims Under §100.18 Introduction In the landmark case of Chris Hinrichs and Autovation Limited v. The...
State v. Coffee: Forfeiture Rule Exception for Newly Introduced Sentencing Inaccuracies

State v. Coffee: Forfeiture Rule Exception for Newly Introduced Sentencing Inaccuracies

Date: Jan 10, 2020
State v. Coffee: Forfeiture Rule Exception for Newly Introduced Sentencing Inaccuracies Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Donavinn D. Coffee is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Wisconsin Supreme...
Affirmation of Mootness in Sufficiency Challenges to Recommitment Orders: Portage County v. J.W.K.

Affirmation of Mootness in Sufficiency Challenges to Recommitment Orders: Portage County v. J.W.K.

Date: May 22, 2019
Affirmation of Mootness in Sufficiency Challenges to Recommitment Orders: Portage County v. J.W.K. Introduction The case of Portage County, Petitioner-Respondent, v. J.W.K.,...
Milwaukee County v. DC-48: Clarifying 'Covered by the Terms of a CBA' in Pension Ordinances

Milwaukee County v. DC-48: Clarifying 'Covered by the Terms of a CBA' in Pension Ordinances

Date: Mar 20, 2019
Milwaukee County v. DC-48: Clarifying 'Covered by the Terms of a CBA' in Pension Ordinances Introduction In the landmark case Milwaukee District Council 48 v. Milwaukee County (385 Wis. 2d 748,...
Structural Error in Termination of Parental Rights: Automatic Reversal for Denial of Case-in-Chief

Structural Error in Termination of Parental Rights: Automatic Reversal for Denial of Case-in-Chief

Date: Feb 20, 2019
Structural Error in Termination of Parental Rights: Automatic Reversal for Denial of Case-in-Chief Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. C.L.K., the Wisconsin Supreme Court...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms $750,000 Cap on Noneconomic Damages in Medical Malpractice as Constitutional

Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms $750,000 Cap on Noneconomic Damages in Medical Malpractice as Constitutional

Date: Jun 28, 2018
Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms $750,000 Cap on Noneconomic Damages in Medical Malpractice as Constitutional Introduction In the landmark case of Ascaris Mayo and Antonio Mayo v. United Healthcare...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Combination Laws for Funeral Industry Under Rational Basis Review

Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Combination Laws for Funeral Industry Under Rational Basis Review

Date: Jun 28, 2018
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Combination Laws for Funeral Industry Under Rational Basis Review Introduction The case of E. Glenn Porter, III and Highland Memorial Park, Inc. v. State of...
State v. Sholar: Upholding Count-specific Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Multi-Count Convictions

State v. Sholar: Upholding Count-specific Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Multi-Count Convictions

Date: May 19, 2018
State v. Sholar: Upholding Count-specific Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Multi-Count Convictions Introduction In the landmark case State of Wisconsin v. Lamont Donnell Sholar (381 Wis....
Supreme Court of Wisconsin Reinforces Deference to Trial Counsel's Strategic Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims: State v. Breitzman

Supreme Court of Wisconsin Reinforces Deference to Trial Counsel's Strategic Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims: State v. Breitzman

Date: Dec 2, 2017
Supreme Court of Wisconsin Reinforces Deference to Trial Counsel's Strategic Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims: State v. Breitzman Introduction State v. Ginger M. Breitzman is a pivotal...
State v. Blackman: Reaffirming the Voluntariness of Consent under Wisconsin's Implied Consent Law

State v. Blackman: Reaffirming the Voluntariness of Consent under Wisconsin's Implied Consent Law

Date: Jul 8, 2017
State v. Blackman: Reaffirming the Voluntariness of Consent under Wisconsin's Implied Consent Law Introduction In State of Wisconsin v. Adam M. Blackman, 377 Wis. 2d 339 (2017), the Wisconsin Supreme...
Affirming Judicial Independence: Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Executive Overreach Unconstitutional in Judge Disciplinary Actions

Affirming Judicial Independence: Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Executive Overreach Unconstitutional in Judge Disciplinary Actions

Date: Jun 28, 2017
Affirming Judicial Independence: Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Executive Overreach Unconstitutional in Judge Disciplinary Actions Introduction In the landmark case The Honorable William M. Gabler,...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms Lifetime Certification Ban for Childcare Providers with Fraud Convictions

Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms Lifetime Certification Ban for Childcare Providers with Fraud Convictions

Date: Jul 7, 2016
Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms Lifetime Certification Ban for Childcare Providers with Fraud Convictions Introduction In Sonja Blake v. Debra Jossart et al., 370 Wis. 2d 1 (2016), the Supreme Court...
Clarifying the Standards for Withdrawing Pleas and the Effect of Read-In Charges: Wisconsin Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Sulla

Clarifying the Standards for Withdrawing Pleas and the Effect of Read-In Charges: Wisconsin Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Sulla

Date: Jun 15, 2016
Clarifying the Standards for Withdrawing Pleas and the Effect of Read-In Charges: Wisconsin Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Sulla Introduction In the landmark decision of State of Wisconsin v....
Joinder of Intimidation and Sexual Assault Charges Proper Under Wis. Stat. § 971.12(1)

Joinder of Intimidation and Sexual Assault Charges Proper Under Wis. Stat. § 971.12(1)

Date: May 27, 2016
Joinder of Intimidation and Sexual Assault Charges Proper Under Wis. Stat. § 971.12(1) Introduction In the landmark case State of Wisconsin v. Luis C. Salinas (369 Wis. 2d 9, 2016), the Supreme Court...
Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants in At-Will Employment: Runzheimer International v. Friedlen

Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants in At-Will Employment: Runzheimer International v. Friedlen

Date: May 1, 2015
Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants in At-Will Employment: Runzheimer International v. Friedlen Introduction Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. Friedlen is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
State v. Subdiaz–Osorio: Legal Precedent for Warrantless Cell Phone Location Tracking under Exigent Circumstances

State v. Subdiaz–Osorio: Legal Precedent for Warrantless Cell Phone Location Tracking under Exigent Circumstances

Date: Jul 25, 2014
State v. Subdiaz–Osorio: Legal Precedent for Warrantless Cell Phone Location Tracking under Exigent Circumstances Introduction State v. Subdiaz–Osorio, 849 N.W.2d 748 (Wis. 2014), is a pivotal...
Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLC: Supreme Court of Wisconsin Clarifies Pleading Standards and the Business Judgment Rule in Fiduciary Duty Claims

Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLC: Supreme Court of Wisconsin Clarifies Pleading Standards and the Business Judgment Rule in Fiduciary Duty Claims

Date: Jul 24, 2014
Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLC: Supreme Court of Wisconsin Clarifies Pleading Standards and the Business Judgment Rule in Fiduciary Duty Claims Introduction Data Key Partners v. Permira...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for §974.06 Motions Alleging Ineffective Postconviction Counsel

Wisconsin Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for §974.06 Motions Alleging Ineffective Postconviction Counsel

Date: Jul 24, 2014
Wisconsin Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for §974.06 Motions Alleging Ineffective Postconviction Counsel Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Andres Romero–Georgana, 849...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert