Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Judicial Immunity Limits for Public Medical Examiners in Autopsy Tort Claims

Judicial Immunity Limits for Public Medical Examiners in Autopsy Tort Claims

Date: Jun 4, 1980
Judicial Immunity Limits for Public Medical Examiners in Autopsy Tort Claims Introduction In the landmark case of James F. Scarpaci and Linda L. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee County, Joseph LaMonte, Chesley...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Right to Multiple Homicide Charges for Single Negligent Act in State v. Rabe

Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Right to Multiple Homicide Charges for Single Negligent Act in State v. Rabe

Date: May 7, 1980
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Right to Multiple Homicide Charges for Single Negligent Act in State v. Rabe Introduction In State of Wisconsin v. David W. Rabe, decided on May 6, 1980, the...
Affirmation of Miranda Rights Compliance in STATE of Wisconsin v. Scott Da Shaffer

Affirmation of Miranda Rights Compliance in STATE of Wisconsin v. Scott Da Shaffer

Date: Apr 25, 1980
Affirmation of Miranda Rights Compliance in STATE of Wisconsin v. Scott Da Shaffer Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Scott David Shaffer, 96 Wis.2d 531 (1980), adjudicated by the Court of Appeals of...
Implied Consent and the Absence of a Right to Counsel: Analysis of STATE v. NEITZEL

Implied Consent and the Absence of a Right to Counsel: Analysis of STATE v. NEITZEL

Date: Apr 2, 1980
Implied Consent and the Absence of a Right to Counsel: Analysis of STATE v. NEITZEL Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Wisconsin v. Franklin J. Neitzel (95 Wis. 2d 191, decided April 1,...
Dejmal Estate Decision: Reinforcing Legal Standards for Will Execution and Undue Influence in Wisconsin Probate Law

Dejmal Estate Decision: Reinforcing Legal Standards for Will Execution and Undue Influence in Wisconsin Probate Law

Date: Apr 2, 1980
Dejmal Estate Decision: Reinforcing Legal Standards for Will Execution and Undue Influence in Wisconsin Probate Law Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Estate of Julia Dejmal, Deceased...
Duty to Disclose in Real Estate Transactions: Analysis of Ollerman v. O'Rourke Company, Inc.

Duty to Disclose in Real Estate Transactions: Analysis of Ollerman v. O'Rourke Company, Inc.

Date: Feb 8, 1980
Duty to Disclose in Real Estate Transactions: Analysis of Ollerman v. O'Rourke Company, Inc. Introduction Ollerman v. O'Rourke Company, Inc. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Restricting Injunctions in Small Claims Actions for Zoning Violations: County of Columbia v. Bylewski

Restricting Injunctions in Small Claims Actions for Zoning Violations: County of Columbia v. Bylewski

Date: Feb 8, 1980
Restricting Injunctions in Small Claims Actions for Zoning Violations: County of Columbia v. Bylewski Introduction The case of County of Columbia v. Bylewski, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations: Religious Accommodation in Unemployment Compensation

Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations: Religious Accommodation in Unemployment Compensation

Date: Feb 8, 1980
Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations: Religious Accommodation in Unemployment Compensation Introduction Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor, Human Relations, and...
Defining "Owner" in Landowner Liability: Insights from WIRTH v. EHLY

Defining "Owner" in Landowner Liability: Insights from WIRTH v. EHLY

Date: Jan 16, 1980
Defining "Owner" in Landowner Liability: Insights from WIRTH v. EHLY Introduction The case of WIRTH, by his Guardian ad Litem, Peter Weisenberger, and others, Appellants, v. EHLY, and others,...
Consideration of Uncharged Offenses in Sentencing: Analysis of Elias v. State

Consideration of Uncharged Offenses in Sentencing: Analysis of Elias v. State

Date: Jan 9, 1980
Consideration of Uncharged Offenses in Sentencing: Analysis of Elias v. State Introduction Elias v. State, 93 Wis. 2d 278 (1980), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, addresses the critical...
Reaffirmation of Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel and Evidentiary Thresholds in Postconviction Motions: STATE v. MACHNER

Reaffirmation of Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel and Evidentiary Thresholds in Postconviction Motions: STATE v. MACHNER

Date: Oct 13, 1979
Reaffirmation of Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel and Evidentiary Thresholds in Postconviction Motions: STATE v. MACHNER 1. Introduction STATE v. MACHNER is a pivotal 1979 decision from...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Damage Limits While Allowing Waivers Through Insurance Endorsements

Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Damage Limits While Allowing Waivers Through Insurance Endorsements

Date: Jun 30, 1979
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Damage Limits While Allowing Waivers Through Insurance Endorsements Introduction Be v. Rly Stanhope is a pivotal 1979 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Bucyrus-Erie Company v. DILHR Dept.: Establishing Standards for Disability-Based Employment Decisions

Bucyrus-Erie Company v. DILHR Dept.: Establishing Standards for Disability-Based Employment Decisions

Date: Jun 30, 1979
Bucyrus-Erie Company v. DILHR Dept.: Establishing Standards for Disability-Based Employment Decisions Introduction Bucyrus-Erie Company v. Department of Industry, Labor Human Relations, Equal Rights...
Unanimity in Verdicts Under Party-to-Crime Statutes: Insights from HOLLAND v. STATE

Unanimity in Verdicts Under Party-to-Crime Statutes: Insights from HOLLAND v. STATE

Date: Jun 30, 1979
Unanimity in Verdicts Under Party-to-Crime Statutes: Insights from HOLLAND v. STATE Introduction HOLLAND v. STATE is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on June 29, 1979. The...
Requirement of Exclusive Attribution for Policy Exclusions in Contractor's All-Risk Insurance: Kraemer Bros. Inc. v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.

Requirement of Exclusive Attribution for Policy Exclusions in Contractor's All-Risk Insurance: Kraemer Bros. Inc. v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.

Date: May 31, 1979
Requirement of Exclusive Attribution for Policy Exclusions in Contractor's All-Risk Insurance Introduction In the landmark case of Kraemer Bros., Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance Company, the...
Ambiguous Fee Agreements in Estate Litigation: Insights from Jones v. Jenkins

Ambiguous Fee Agreements in Estate Litigation: Insights from Jones v. Jenkins

Date: May 2, 1979
Ambiguous Fee Agreements in Estate Litigation: Insights from Jones v. Jenkins Introduction The case of Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jenkins, Defendant-Respondent (88 Wis. 2d 712) adjudicated by the...
Tortious Interference with Contracts Terminable at Will: Charolais Breeding Ranches v. FPC Securities Corporation

Tortious Interference with Contracts Terminable at Will: Charolais Breeding Ranches v. FPC Securities Corporation

Date: Apr 28, 1979
Tortious Interference with Contracts Terminable at Will: Charolais Breeding Ranches v. FPC Securities Corporation Introduction The case of Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities...
Admissibility of Defendant’s Statements and Prosecutorial Rebuttal Standards in DUI Cases: Insights from State v. Draize (Wis. 1979)

Admissibility of Defendant’s Statements and Prosecutorial Rebuttal Standards in DUI Cases: Insights from State v. Draize (Wis. 1979)

Date: Mar 28, 1979
Admissibility of Defendant’s Statements and Prosecutorial Rebuttal Standards in DUI Cases: Insights from State v. Draize (Wis. 1979) Introduction The case of State v. Draize, adjudicated by the...
Reaffirmation of Standards for Dismissing Negligence Claims: Morgan v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.

Reaffirmation of Standards for Dismissing Negligence Claims: Morgan v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.

Date: Feb 28, 1979
Reaffirmation of Standards for Dismissing Negligence Claims: Morgan v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. Introduction Morgan v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co., 87 Wis. 2d 723 (1979), adjudicated...
Defective Unitrol Valve Liability: Comprehensive Commentary on Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls

Defective Unitrol Valve Liability: Comprehensive Commentary on Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls

Date: Jan 31, 1979
Defective Unitrol Valve Liability: Comprehensive Commentary on Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Introduction Cogswell, and others v. Robertshaw Controls Company, and another is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert