Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Washington Supreme Court Affirms Entitlement to Lesser Included Offense Instructions Under Workman Test in Aggravated Premeditated Murder Cases

Washington Supreme Court Affirms Entitlement to Lesser Included Offense Instructions Under Workman Test in Aggravated Premeditated Murder Cases

Date: Jan 9, 2015
Washington Supreme Court Affirms Entitlement to Lesser Included Offense Instructions Under Workman Test in Aggravated Premeditated Murder Cases Introduction In State of Washington v. Joel Cameron...
State v. Quaale: Limitations on HGN Testimony in DUI Prosecutions

State v. Quaale: Limitations on HGN Testimony in DUI Prosecutions

Date: Dec 19, 2014
State v. Quaale: Limitations on HGN Testimony in DUI Prosecutions Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Ryan Richard Quaale, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed the...
Durland v. San Juan County: Strict Adherence to LUPA's Exhaustion Requirements Affirmed

Durland v. San Juan County: Strict Adherence to LUPA's Exhaustion Requirements Affirmed

Date: Dec 12, 2014
Durland v. San Juan County: Strict Adherence to LUPA's Exhaustion Requirements Affirmed Introduction Durland v. San Juan County is a significant judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Washington...
Admissibility of Prior Domestic Violence Acts: State v. Gunderson Establishes New Limitations

Admissibility of Prior Domestic Violence Acts: State v. Gunderson Establishes New Limitations

Date: Nov 21, 2014
Admissibility of Prior Domestic Violence Acts: State v. Gunderson Establishes New Limitations Introduction State v. Daniel Scott Gunderson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reversing Precedent: Washington Supreme Court Establishes State Must Disprove Consent in Forcible Compulsion Rape Cases

Reversing Precedent: Washington Supreme Court Establishes State Must Disprove Consent in Forcible Compulsion Rape Cases

Date: Oct 31, 2014
Reversing Precedent: Washington Supreme Court Establishes State Must Disprove Consent in Forcible Compulsion Rape Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. W.R., J.R., decided...
Expansion of Consumer Protection Claims in Nonjudicial Foreclosures: Lyons v. U.S. Bank

Expansion of Consumer Protection Claims in Nonjudicial Foreclosures: Lyons v. U.S. Bank

Date: Oct 31, 2014
Expansion of Consumer Protection Claims in Nonjudicial Foreclosures: Lyons v. U.S. Bank National Association Introduction Parties Involved: Appellant: Winnie Lyons, a single person. Defendants: U.S....
Sidebars and the Public Trial Right: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Boundaries

Sidebars and the Public Trial Right: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Boundaries

Date: Sep 26, 2014
Sidebars and the Public Trial Right: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Boundaries Introduction In State of Washington v. William Glen Smith (181 Wash.2d 508, 2014), the Supreme Court of Washington...
Washington Supreme Court Ruling: No Monetary Damages for DTA Violations Without Foreclosure Sale

Washington Supreme Court Ruling: No Monetary Damages for DTA Violations Without Foreclosure Sale

Date: Sep 19, 2014
Washington Supreme Court Ruling: No Monetary Damages for DTA Violations Without Foreclosure Sale Introduction The case of Florence R. Frias v. Asset Foreclosure Services, Inc., et al. presented a...
Clarifying Pretext Standards in Age Discrimination Cases: Scrivener v. Clark College

Clarifying Pretext Standards in Age Discrimination Cases: Scrivener v. Clark College

Date: Sep 19, 2014
Clarifying Pretext Standards in Age Discrimination Cases: Scrivener v. Clark College 1. Introduction In Kathryn Scrivener v. Clark College, 181 Wash.2d 439 (2014), the Supreme Court of Washington...
Standard for Imposing Parenting Plan Restrictions Under RCW 26.09.191(3)(g): Ensuring Protections Against Severe Harm

Standard for Imposing Parenting Plan Restrictions Under RCW 26.09.191(3)(g): Ensuring Protections Against Severe Harm

Date: Sep 11, 2014
Standard for Imposing Parenting Plan Restrictions Under RCW 26.09.191(3)(g): Ensuring Protections Against Severe Harm Introduction The case In re the Marriage of Neha Vyas Chandola and Manjul Varn...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Legislative Authority to Amend Public Pension COLA

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Legislative Authority to Amend Public Pension COLA

Date: Aug 15, 2014
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Legislative Authority to Amend Public Pension COLA Introduction The case of Washington Education Association v. Washington Department of Retirement Systems (332 P.3d...
Admissibility of Evidence in Dissenters' Rights Share Valuation and Proper Awarding of Attorney Fees: Sentinelc3, Inc. v. Hunt

Admissibility of Evidence in Dissenters' Rights Share Valuation and Proper Awarding of Attorney Fees: Sentinelc3, Inc. v. Hunt

Date: Aug 1, 2014
Admissibility of Evidence in Dissenters' Rights Share Valuation and Proper Awarding of Attorney Fees: Sentinelc3, Inc. v. Hunt Introduction In the case of SentinelC3, Inc., a Washington Corporation,...
State v. Homan: Washington Supreme Court Affirms Sufficient Evidence Standard for Child Luring under RCW 9A.40.090

State v. Homan: Washington Supreme Court Affirms Sufficient Evidence Standard for Child Luring under RCW 9A.40.090

Date: Aug 1, 2014
State v. Homan: Washington Supreme Court Affirms Sufficient Evidence Standard for Child Luring under RCW 9A.40.090 Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Russell David Homan (330...
Open Administration of Justice Prevails: Supreme Court Denies Redaction of Defendant Names in Unlawful Detainer Cases

Open Administration of Justice Prevails: Supreme Court Denies Redaction of Defendant Names in Unlawful Detainer Cases

Date: Jul 25, 2014
Open Administration of Justice Prevails: Supreme Court Denies Redaction of Defendant Names in Unlawful Detainer Cases Introduction The case of Aaron Hundtofte and Kent Alexander v. Ignacio...
Washington Supreme Court Expands "Seller" Definition Under WSSA in FutureSelect v. Tremont

Washington Supreme Court Expands "Seller" Definition Under WSSA in FutureSelect v. Tremont

Date: Jul 18, 2014
Washington Supreme Court Expands "Seller" Definition Under WSSA in FutureSelect v. Tremont Introduction FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. sued several defendants, including Tremont Group...
State of Washington v. Witherspoon: Affirmation of Persistent Offender Accountability Act's Mandatory Life Sentences

State of Washington v. Witherspoon: Affirmation of Persistent Offender Accountability Act's Mandatory Life Sentences

Date: Jul 18, 2014
State of Washington v. Witherspoon: Affirmation of Persistent Offender Accountability Act's Mandatory Life Sentences Introduction State of Washington v. Alvin Leslie Witherspoon, 329 P.3d 888 (Wash....
Invalidity of Sentencing Agreements and Prejudice Requirements: Insights from In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Robert Lee YATES, Jr.

Invalidity of Sentencing Agreements and Prejudice Requirements: Insights from In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Robert Lee YATES, Jr.

Date: Jul 17, 2014
Invalidity of Sentencing Agreements and Prejudice Requirements: Insights from In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Robert Lee YATES, Jr. Introduction The case In the Matter of the Personal...
Miranda Rights and Effective Counsel: The Dayva Cross Judgment

Miranda Rights and Effective Counsel: The Dayva Cross Judgment

Date: Jun 27, 2014
Miranda Rights and Effective Counsel: The Dayva Cross Judgment Introduction In the landmark case STATE v. CROSS, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed critical issues surrounding Miranda rights,...
Reasonableness of Employment Termination in 'Quit to Follow' Claims: Campbell v. State of Washington Employment Security Department

Reasonableness of Employment Termination in 'Quit to Follow' Claims: Campbell v. State of Washington Employment Security Department

Date: Jun 13, 2014
Reasonableness of Employment Termination in 'Quit to Follow' Claims Campbell v. State of Washington Employment Security Department, 326 P.3d 713 (2014) Introduction The case of Robert Campbell v....
Ensuring Jury Unanimity and Impartiality: Insights from STATE v. Lamar

Ensuring Jury Unanimity and Impartiality: Insights from STATE v. Lamar

Date: Jun 13, 2014
Ensuring Jury Unanimity and Impartiality: Insights from STATE v. Lamar Introduction STATE of Washington v. Lonnie Curtis Lamar (327 P.3d 46) is a significant judgment delivered by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert