Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

STATE v. PARRIS: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions Without Confrontation Clause Violation

STATE v. PARRIS: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions Without Confrontation Clause Violation

Date: Nov 25, 1982
STATE v. PARRIS: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions Without Confrontation Clause Violation Introduction In State of Washington v. John Parris, 98 Wn. 2d 140 (1982), the Supreme Court of Washington...
State of Washington v. Dudley Mark Bonds: Balancing Exclusionary Rule in Interstate Arrests

State of Washington v. Dudley Mark Bonds: Balancing Exclusionary Rule in Interstate Arrests

Date: Nov 11, 1982
State of Washington v. Dudley Mark Bonds: Balancing Exclusionary Rule in Interstate Arrests Introduction State of Washington v. Dudley Mark Bonds is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Conviction in State v. Robtoy: Admissibility of Confessions and Evidence of Other Crimes

Affirmation of Conviction in State v. Robtoy: Admissibility of Confessions and Evidence of Other Crimes

Date: Nov 11, 1982
Affirmation of Conviction in State v. Robtoy: Admissibility of Confessions and Evidence of Other Crimes Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Michael G. Robtoy (98 Wn.2d 30) represents a...
Negligent Furnishing of Firearms to Intoxicated Persons: Bernethy v. Failor's Inc.

Negligent Furnishing of Firearms to Intoxicated Persons: Bernethy v. Failor's Inc.

Date: Nov 5, 1982
Negligent Furnishing of Firearms to Intoxicated Persons: Bernethy v. Failor's Inc. Introduction Carolee Bernethy, acting as the personal representative and guardian ad litem for the estate of Phoebe...
Requirement of Actual Prejudice in Personal Restraint Petitions: Insights from State v. Hagler, 97 Wn. 2d 818 (1982)

Requirement of Actual Prejudice in Personal Restraint Petitions: Insights from State v. Hagler, 97 Wn. 2d 818 (1982)

Date: Sep 10, 1982
Requirement of Actual Prejudice in Personal Restraint Petitions: Insights from State v. Hagler, 97 Wn. 2d 818 (1982) Introduction In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of DAVID F. HAGLER, ET AL,...
Affirmation of Life Imprisonment Without Parole and Standards for Severance in Joint Trials: State v. Grisby, Frazier (1982)

Affirmation of Life Imprisonment Without Parole and Standards for Severance in Joint Trials: State v. Grisby, Frazier (1982)

Date: Jun 18, 1982
Affirmation of Life Imprisonment Without Parole and Standards for Severance in Joint Trials: State of Washington v. Grisby, Jr. & Frazier (1982) Introduction In the landmark case of State of...
Strict Interpretation of Bona Fide Occupational Qualification Reinforced in Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. Betty P. Sellers

Strict Interpretation of Bona Fide Occupational Qualification Reinforced in Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. Betty P. Sellers

Date: May 14, 1982
Strict Interpretation of Bona Fide Occupational Qualification Reinforced in Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. Betty P. Sellers Introduction In the landmark case Franklin County Sheriff's Office,...
Washington Supreme Court Invalidates Family Exclusion Clauses in Auto Insurance Policies

Washington Supreme Court Invalidates Family Exclusion Clauses in Auto Insurance Policies

Date: Apr 9, 1982
Washington Supreme Court Invalidates Family Exclusion Clauses in Auto Insurance Policies Introduction In the landmark case of Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company v. Maura McGahan Wiscomb, et al.,...
Washington Supreme Court Invalidates Vague Stop-and-Identify Statutes: State v. Allen White

Washington Supreme Court Invalidates Vague Stop-and-Identify Statutes: State v. Allen White

Date: Feb 19, 1982
Washington Supreme Court Invalidates Vague Stop-and-Identify Statutes: State v. Allen White Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Allen White, decided on February 18, 1982, the...
Balancing Open Justice and Fair Trial: Insights from Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa

Balancing Open Justice and Fair Trial: Insights from Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa

Date: Feb 12, 1982
Balancing Open Justice and Fair Trial: Insights from Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa Introduction Seattle Times Company v. Richard M. Ishikawa, 97 Wn. 2d 30 (1982), is a landmark decision by the...
Jury Unanimity Not Required for Alternative Methods of Single Offense: State v. Franco

Jury Unanimity Not Required for Alternative Methods of Single Offense: State v. Franco

Date: Jan 16, 1982
Jury Unanimity Not Required for Alternative Methods of Single Offense: State v. Franco Introduction In State of Washington v. George E. Franco (96 Wn. 2d 816), the Supreme Court of Washington...
Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence in Criminal Trials: STATE v. RENFRO

Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence in Criminal Trials: STATE v. RENFRO

Date: Jan 16, 1982
Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence in Criminal Trials: STATE v. RENFRO Introduction State of Washington v. Rudolph William Renfro (96 Wn.2d 902) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Ridgeview Properties v. Starbuck: Clarifying Dual Agency and Illegal Tying Arrangements in Real Estate Transactions

Ridgeview Properties v. Starbuck: Clarifying Dual Agency and Illegal Tying Arrangements in Real Estate Transactions

Date: Jan 15, 1982
Ridgeview Properties v. Starbuck: Clarifying Dual Agency and Illegal Tying Arrangements in Real Estate Transactions Introduction Ridgeview Properties, Respondent, v. Charles A. Starbuck, et al.,...
Equitable Criteria for Tax Collection Injunctions: Tyler Pipe Industries v. Department of Revenue

Equitable Criteria for Tax Collection Injunctions: Tyler Pipe Industries v. Department of Revenue

Date: Jan 15, 1982
Equitable Criteria for Tax Collection Injunctions: Tyler Pipe Industries v. Department of Revenue Introduction The case of Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. The Department of Revenue (96 Wn. 2d 785)...
Admissibility of Prior Convictions and Furlough Status in Criminal Trials: Insights from STATE v. THARP

Admissibility of Prior Convictions and Furlough Status in Criminal Trials: Insights from STATE v. THARP

Date: Dec 18, 1981
Admissibility of Prior Convictions and Furlough Status in Criminal Trials: Insights from STATE v. THARP Introduction State of Washington v. Jo Elliott Tharp, 96 Wn. 2d 591 (1981), adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Boundaries of Qualified Privilege in Defamation Claims: The Albert M. MARK v. SEATTLE TIMES Decision

Establishing the Boundaries of Qualified Privilege in Defamation Claims: The Albert M. MARK v. SEATTLE TIMES Decision

Date: Nov 13, 1981
Establishing the Boundaries of Qualified Privilege in Defamation Claims: The Albert M. MARK v. SEATTLE TIMES Decision Introduction The case of Albert M. Mark v. The Seattle Times presents a pivotal...
Hartzog v. Washington (1981): Establishing Standards for Inmate Searches and Courtroom Restraints

Hartzog v. Washington (1981): Establishing Standards for Inmate Searches and Courtroom Restraints

Date: Oct 30, 1981
Hartzog v. Washington (1981): Establishing Standards for Inmate Searches and Courtroom Restraints Introduction The landmark case of State of Washington v. Herman Donald Hartzog (96 Wn. 2d 383, 1981)...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Intent Not Required for Controlled Substances Possession

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Intent Not Required for Controlled Substances Possession

Date: Oct 30, 1981
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Intent Not Required for Controlled Substances Possession Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Gerald Paul Cleppe, decided on October...
Clarifying Standards for Granting New Trials: Cumulative Evidence and Lineup Irregularities in STATE v. WILLIAMS

Clarifying Standards for Granting New Trials: Cumulative Evidence and Lineup Irregularities in STATE v. WILLIAMS

Date: Oct 9, 1981
Clarifying Standards for Granting New Trials: Cumulative Evidence and Lineup Irregularities in STATE v. WILLIAMS Introduction The State of Washington v. Clarence E. Williams is a pivotal case decided...
Open View Doctrine Affirmed: Validity of Search Warrants Despite Innocent Misidentification

Open View Doctrine Affirmed: Validity of Search Warrants Despite Innocent Misidentification

Date: Jul 31, 1981
Open View Doctrine Affirmed: Validity of Search Warrants Despite Innocent Misidentification Introduction In State of Washington v. Suzzi Seagull et al. (95 Wn.2d 898, 1981), the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert