Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Liability of Escrow Agents for Unauthorized Practice of Law under Washington's Consumer Protection Act

Liability of Escrow Agents for Unauthorized Practice of Law under Washington's Consumer Protection Act

Date: Dec 16, 1983
Liability of Escrow Agents for Unauthorized Practice of Law under Washington's Consumer Protection Act Introduction The case of JACK L. BOWERS, ET AL v. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY (100 Wn....
Presumption of Intent in Burglary Prosecutions: Analysis of STATE v. JOHNSON et al.

Presumption of Intent in Burglary Prosecutions: Analysis of STATE v. JOHNSON et al.

Date: Dec 16, 1983
Presumption of Intent in Burglary Prosecutions: Analysis of STATE v. JOHNSON et al. Introduction State of Washington v. Johnson et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Washington,...
Duty to Protect Third Parties: Insights from Petersen v. State of Washington

Duty to Protect Third Parties: Insights from Petersen v. State of Washington

Date: Oct 21, 1983
Duty to Protect Third Parties: Insights from Petersen v. State of Washington Introduction The landmark case of Cynthia E. Petersen v. The State of Washington, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Protection of Union "Do Not Patronize" Campaigns Under First Amendment in Caruso v. Local Union No. 690

Protection of Union "Do Not Patronize" Campaigns Under First Amendment in Caruso v. Local Union No. 690

Date: Sep 30, 1983
Protection of Union "Do Not Patronize" Campaigns Under First Amendment in Caruso v. Local Union No. 690 Introduction The case of Robert E. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690 of the International...
Chambers-Castanes v. King County: Establishing Liability for Police Negligence in Emotional Distress Claims

Chambers-Castanes v. King County: Establishing Liability for Police Negligence in Emotional Distress Claims

Date: Sep 16, 1983
Chambers-Castanes v. King County: Establishing Liability for Police Negligence in Emotional Distress Claims Introduction In the landmark case Chambers-Castanes v. King County, the Supreme Court of...
Duty of Care for Emergency Vehicle Drivers: An Analysis of Thomas Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1

Duty of Care for Emergency Vehicle Drivers: An Analysis of Thomas Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1

Date: Aug 5, 1983
Duty of Care for Emergency Vehicle Drivers: An Analysis of Thomas Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 Introduction The case of Thomas Brown, as Personal Representative v. Spokane...
Admissibility of Collateral Sexual Misconduct Evidence in Indecent Liberties Cases: Analysis of THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. FRANK FERGUSON

Admissibility of Collateral Sexual Misconduct Evidence in Indecent Liberties Cases: Analysis of THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. FRANK FERGUSON

Date: Jul 29, 1983
Admissibility of Collateral Sexual Misconduct Evidence in Indecent Liberties Cases: Analysis of The State of Washington v. Frank Ferguson Introduction The State of Washington v. Frank Ferguson, 100...
Informed Consent Materiality in Medical Malpractice: Vera Smith v. Roger Shannon

Informed Consent Materiality in Medical Malpractice: Vera Smith v. Roger Shannon

Date: Jul 1, 1983
Informed Consent Materiality in Medical Malpractice: Vera Smith v. Roger Shannon Introduction Vera M. Smith v. Roger H. Shannon, et al. is a pivotal case in Washington State's legal landscape...
Washington Federation of State Employees v. State of Washington: Precedent on Preliminary Injunctions in Payroll Systems

Washington Federation of State Employees v. State of Washington: Precedent on Preliminary Injunctions in Payroll Systems

Date: Jun 24, 1983
Washington Federation of State Employees v. State of Washington: Precedent on Preliminary Injunctions in Payroll Systems Introduction Washington Federation of State Employees, Council 28, AFL-CIO...
Comprehensive Commentary on In the Matter of the Welfare of ADRIAN T. HALL (99 Wn. 2d 842)

Comprehensive Commentary on In the Matter of the Welfare of ADRIAN T. HALL (99 Wn. 2d 842)

Date: Jun 17, 1983
Affirmation of Parental Rights Termination Standards and Restrictions on Appointed Counsel Withdrawal in Deprivation Proceedings Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of In the...
Affirming the Right to Waive Insanity Defense: State of Washington v. Larry Jones

Affirming the Right to Waive Insanity Defense: State of Washington v. Larry Jones

Date: Jun 10, 1983
Affirming the Right to Waive Insanity Defense: State of Washington v. Larry Jones Introduction State of Washington v. Larry Richard Jones, 99 Wn. 2d 735 (1983), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Loss of a Chance as Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death: Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative

Loss of a Chance as Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death: Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative

Date: May 27, 1983
Loss of a Chance as Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death: Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative Introduction The case of Edith E. Herskovits, as Personal Representative v. Group Health Cooperative of...
Limitation of Sovereign Immunity in Government Tort Liability: Stanley Bender v. City of Seattle

Limitation of Sovereign Immunity in Government Tort Liability: Stanley Bender v. City of Seattle

Date: May 27, 1983
Limitation of Sovereign Immunity in Government Tort Liability: Stanley Bender v. City of Seattle Introduction The case of Stanley Bender v. The City of Seattle, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Double Jeopardy under RCW 10.43.040 in State v. Caliguri

Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Double Jeopardy under RCW 10.43.040 in State v. Caliguri

Date: May 6, 1983
Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Double Jeopardy under RCW 10.43.040 in State v. Caliguri Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Richard Francis Caliguri, 99 Wn. 2d 501 (1983),...
Adoption of Reasonable Prudence Standard and Inclusivity of Non-Physician Experts in Medical Malpractice Cases: HARRIS v. GROTH

Adoption of Reasonable Prudence Standard and Inclusivity of Non-Physician Experts in Medical Malpractice Cases: HARRIS v. GROTH

Date: Apr 29, 1983
Adoption of Reasonable Prudence Standard and Inclusivity of Non-Physician Experts in Medical Malpractice Cases: HARRIS v. GROTH Introduction Barbara Harris, et al. v. Robert C. Groth, M.D., Inc.,...
State v. Vladovic: Merger Doctrine and Double Jeopardy in Robbery and Kidnapping Convictions

State v. Vladovic: Merger Doctrine and Double Jeopardy in Robbery and Kidnapping Convictions

Date: Apr 29, 1983
State v. Vladovic: Merger Doctrine and Double Jeopardy in Robbery and Kidnapping Convictions Introduction The State of Washington v. John Anthony Vladovic is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Establishing Habitual Criminal Status: Proving Defendant’s Awareness of Rights in Guilty Pleas

Establishing Habitual Criminal Status: Proving Defendant’s Awareness of Rights in Guilty Pleas

Date: Apr 22, 1983
Establishing Habitual Criminal Status: Proving Defendant’s Awareness of Rights in Guilty Pleas Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Dale Robert Chervenell and Reginald John Crigler (99...
Strict Interpretation of Revocation Criteria and Notice Requirements in Mental Health Commitment: Cross v. Diamond

Strict Interpretation of Revocation Criteria and Notice Requirements in Mental Health Commitment: Cross v. Diamond

Date: Apr 22, 1983
Strict Interpretation of Revocation Criteria and Notice Requirements in Mental Health Commitment: Cross v. Diamond Introduction In the Matter of Eloise Cross v. Leon S. Diamond, et al. is a seminal...
Reaffirmation of Felony Flight Criminalization and Standards for Trial Irregularities in Washington State

Reaffirmation of Felony Flight Criminalization and Standards for Trial Irregularities in Washington State

Date: Mar 11, 1983
Reaffirmation of Felony Flight Criminalization and Standards for Trial Irregularities in Washington State Introduction The State of Washington v. Edward Lee Weber, 99 Wn.2d 158 (1983), is a pivotal...
Strict Compliance with Appellate Procedure: Insights from THOMAS v. FRENCH

Strict Compliance with Appellate Procedure: Insights from THOMAS v. FRENCH

Date: Mar 4, 1983
Strict Compliance with Appellate Procedure: Insights from THOMAS v. FRENCH (99 Wn. 2d 95) Introduction THOMAS v. FRENCH is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington in 1983. This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert