Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Trade Name Infringement Under the Consumer Protection Act: NORDSTROM, INC. v. TAMPOURLOS

Trade Name Infringement Under the Consumer Protection Act: NORDSTROM, INC. v. TAMPOURLOS

Date: Feb 27, 1987
Trade Name Infringement Under the Consumer Protection Act: NORDSTROM, INC. v. TAMPOURLOS Introduction Nordstrom, Inc. v. G. James Tampourlos, et al. is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Hansen v. Rothaus: Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Prejudgment Interest Eligibility for Liquidated Claims

Hansen v. Rothaus: Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Prejudgment Interest Eligibility for Liquidated Claims

Date: Dec 25, 1986
Hansen v. Rothaus: Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Prejudgment Interest Eligibility for Liquidated Claims Introduction The case of Hansen, et al. v. Rothaus, et al., decided by the Supreme Court...
Concurrent Condition Breaches and Equitable Rescission in Real Estate Contracts: Willener v. Sweeting

Concurrent Condition Breaches and Equitable Rescission in Real Estate Contracts: Willener v. Sweeting

Date: Dec 12, 1986
Concurrent Condition Breaches and Equitable Rescission in Real Estate Contracts: Willener v. Sweeting Introduction Willener v. Sweeting, 107 Wn. 2d 388 (1986), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Inherent Power: Pretrial Dismissal for Insufficient Evidence in STATE v. KNAPSTAD

Clarifying Inherent Power: Pretrial Dismissal for Insufficient Evidence in STATE v. KNAPSTAD

Date: Dec 5, 1986
Clarifying Inherent Power: Pretrial Dismissal for Insufficient Evidence in State of Washington v. Douglas W. Knapstad Introduction State of Washington v. Douglas W. Knapstad, 107 Wn. 2d 346 (1986),...
Affirmation of Common Law Access to Court Records Over Public Disclosure Act in Thomas B. Nast v. M. Janice Michels

Affirmation of Common Law Access to Court Records Over Public Disclosure Act in Thomas B. Nast v. M. Janice Michels

Date: Dec 5, 1986
Affirmation of Common Law Access to Court Records Over Public Disclosure Act in Thomas B. Nast v. M. Janice Michels Introduction In the landmark case of Thomas B. Nast v. M. Janice Michels,...
Defining "Gravely Disabled": Washington Supreme Court's 1986 Ruling on Involuntary Mental Health Commitment

Defining "Gravely Disabled": Washington Supreme Court's 1986 Ruling on Involuntary Mental Health Commitment

Date: Nov 14, 1986
Defining "Gravely Disabled": Washington Supreme Court's 1986 Ruling on Involuntary Mental Health Commitment Introduction The Washington Supreme Court's 1986 decision in In the Matter of the Detention...
Baughn v. Honda Motor Company: Affirming Strict Liability Principles in Product Liability Cases

Baughn v. Honda Motor Company: Affirming Strict Liability Principles in Product Liability Cases

Date: Nov 7, 1986
Baughn v. Honda Motor Company: Affirming Strict Liability Principles in Product Liability Cases Introduction The case of Bradley Lester Baughn, Appellant, v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd., et al....
Affirmation of Reasonable Detention and Search in Vehicle Stops Based on Corroborated Informant Tips

Affirmation of Reasonable Detention and Search in Vehicle Stops Based on Corroborated Informant Tips

Date: Oct 17, 1986
Affirmation of Reasonable Detention and Search in Vehicle Stops Based on Corroborated Informant Tips Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Michael Kennedy (107 Wn. 2d 1) addresses critical...
Intentional Discrimination Excluded from Liability Insurance Coverage: Insights from E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Intentional Discrimination Excluded from Liability Insurance Coverage: Insights from E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Date: Oct 10, 1986
Intentional Discrimination Excluded from Liability Insurance Coverage: Insights from E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. Introduction E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc., Appellant,...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Contract Killing Cases: Analysis of State v. Harris

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Contract Killing Cases: Analysis of State v. Harris

Date: Oct 3, 1986
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Contract Killing Cases: Analysis of State v. Harris Introduction State of Washington v. Benjamin James Harris III is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Prior Unrelated Crimes under ER 404(b) in Sexual Offense Cases: State v. Smith Commentary

Admissibility of Prior Unrelated Crimes under ER 404(b) in Sexual Offense Cases: State v. Smith Commentary

Date: Oct 3, 1986
Admissibility of Prior Unrelated Crimes under ER 404(b) in Sexual Offense Cases: State v. Smith Introduction The State of Washington v. Phillip Arthur Smith, 106 Wn.2d 772 (1986), is a pivotal case...
Facially Neutral Policies and Disparate Impact: Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company

Facially Neutral Policies and Disparate Impact: Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company

Date: Sep 12, 1986
Facially Neutral Policies and Disparate Impact: Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company Introduction Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, 106 Wn. 2d 675 (1986), is a pivotal...
Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule in Driving While Intoxicated Cases: City of BREMERTON v. CORBETT

Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule in Driving While Intoxicated Cases: City of BREMERTON v. CORBETT

Date: Aug 22, 1986
Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule in Driving While Intoxicated Cases: City of BREMERTON v. CORBETT Introduction City of BREMERTON v. CORBETT, 106 Wn. 2d 569 (1986), presents a pivotal moment...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Exceptional Sentence in Vehicular Assault Based on Victim Vulnerability and Defendant's Intent

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Exceptional Sentence in Vehicular Assault Based on Victim Vulnerability and Defendant's Intent

Date: Aug 15, 1986
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Exceptional Sentence in Vehicular Assault Based on Victim Vulnerability and Defendant's Intent Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. John P....
State v. Oxborrow: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Consecutive Exceptional Sentencing

State v. Oxborrow: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Consecutive Exceptional Sentencing

Date: Aug 15, 1986
State v. Oxborrow: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Consecutive Exceptional Sentencing Introduction State of Washington v. Kenneth D. Oxborrow, 106 Wn.2d 525 (Supreme Court of Washington, 1986), is a...
First Vendee’s Right to Recover Damages from Successive Vendee Upon Default: Smith v. King

First Vendee’s Right to Recover Damages from Successive Vendee Upon Default: Smith v. King

Date: Jul 25, 1986
First Vendee’s Right to Recover Damages from Successive Vendee Upon Default: Smith v. King Introduction Robert D. Smith, et al. v. Larry D. King, et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Statute of Limitations for False Light Invasion of Privacy Claims Established in EASTWOOD v. CASCADE BROADCASTING Company

Statute of Limitations for False Light Invasion of Privacy Claims Established in EASTWOOD v. CASCADE BROADCASTING Company

Date: Jul 25, 1986
Statute of Limitations for False Light Invasion of Privacy Claims Established in EASTWOOD v. CASCADE BROADCASTING Company Introduction Clyde Eastwood and associates filed a lawsuit against three...
Share v. Bering: Defining Boundaries for Antiabortion Picketing Near Medical Facilities and Child Welfare

Share v. Bering: Defining Boundaries for Antiabortion Picketing Near Medical Facilities and Child Welfare

Date: Jun 20, 1986
Share v. Bering: Defining Boundaries for Antiabortion Picketing Near Medical Facilities and Child Welfare Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington's decision in Stacie C. Bering, et al.,...
Affirmation of Death-Qualified Juries and Limitations on Judicial Sentencing Discretion: Commentary on State v. Hughes

Affirmation of Death-Qualified Juries and Limitations on Judicial Sentencing Discretion: Commentary on State v. Hughes

Date: Jun 20, 1986
Affirmation of Death-Qualified Juries and Limitations on Judicial Sentencing Discretion: Commentary on State v. Hughes Introduction State of Washington v. Robert Wayne Hughes is a pivotal case...
Defining the Scope of Automobile Searches Incident to Arrest under Washington State Constitution

Defining the Scope of Automobile Searches Incident to Arrest under Washington State Constitution

Date: Jun 13, 1986
Defining the Scope of Automobile Searches Incident to Arrest under Washington State Constitution Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Billy Steven Stroud, et al. (106 Wn....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert