Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

FOLSOM v. COUNTY OF SPOKANE: Establishing Comprehensive Valuation Principles for Leased Commercial Properties

FOLSOM v. COUNTY OF SPOKANE: Establishing Comprehensive Valuation Principles for Leased Commercial Properties

Date: Jul 16, 1988
FOLSOM v. COUNTY OF SPOKANE: Establishing Comprehensive Valuation Principles for Leased Commercial Properties Introduction FOLSOM v. COUNTY OF SPOKANE is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court...
SEATTLE v. EZE: Upholding Disorderly Conduct Ordinances in Public Transit

SEATTLE v. EZE: Upholding Disorderly Conduct Ordinances in Public Transit

Date: Jul 15, 1988
SEATTLE v. EZE: Upholding Disorderly Conduct Ordinances in Public Transit Introduction In The City of Seattle v. John O.J. Eze, 111 Wn.2d 22 (1988), the Supreme Court of Washington addressed the...
Admissibility of Prior Theft Convictions for Impeachment and Identity: STATE v. BROWN

Admissibility of Prior Theft Convictions for Impeachment and Identity: STATE v. BROWN

Date: Jul 15, 1988
Admissibility of Prior Theft Convictions for Impeachment and Identity: STATE v. BROWN Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. James Artis Brown (111 Wn. 2d 124), the Supreme Court...
Indefinite Civil Contempt in Juvenile Dependency Cases: The Supreme Court of Washington's Ruling in Dawson King

Indefinite Civil Contempt in Juvenile Dependency Cases: The Supreme Court of Washington's Ruling in Dawson King

Date: Jun 24, 1988
Indefinite Civil Contempt in Juvenile Dependency Cases: The Supreme Court of Washington's Ruling in Dawson King Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Dawson King,...
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Judicial Standards on Evidence Admissibility and Defendant's Rights in Washington

Affirmation of Death Penalty: Judicial Standards on Evidence Admissibility and Defendant's Rights in Washington

Date: Jun 10, 1988
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Judicial Standards on Evidence Admissibility and Defendant's Rights in Washington Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. David Lewis Rice (110...
Clarifying Appellate Procedures and Jury Instruction Standards in Accomplice Liability Cases

Clarifying Appellate Procedures and Jury Instruction Standards in Accomplice Liability Cases

Date: Jun 10, 1988
Clarifying Appellate Procedures and Jury Instruction Standards in Accomplice Liability Cases Introduction In the landmark case The State of Washington v. Keith Lyle Scott et al., Ferdinand Brown,...
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: The Landmark Decision in STATE v. BELGARDE

Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: The Landmark Decision in STATE v. BELGARDE

Date: May 27, 1988
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: The Landmark Decision in STATE v. BELGARDE Introduction State of Washington v. Kermit A. Belgarde, 110 Wn. 2d 504 (1988), is a pivotal case in...
Defendant's Right to Withdraw Guilty Plea When Based on Mutual Misunderstanding of Sentencing Law: STATE v. MILLER

Defendant's Right to Withdraw Guilty Plea When Based on Mutual Misunderstanding of Sentencing Law: STATE v. MILLER

Date: May 27, 1988
Defendant's Right to Withdraw Guilty Plea When Based on Mutual Misunderstanding of Sentencing Law: STATE v. MILLER Introduction State of Washington v. Ronald Shellie Miller (110 Wn. 2d 528, 1988) is...
Establishing Special Relationships: Implications from Arthur Hoffers v. State of Washington

Establishing Special Relationships: Implications from Arthur Hoffers v. State of Washington

Date: May 13, 1988
Establishing Special Relationships: Implications from Arthur Hoffers, et al. v. The State of Washington Introduction In Arthur Hoffers, et al. v. The State of Washington, et al. (110 Wn.2d 415),...
Miranda Implications in State v. Wethered: A Comprehensive Analysis

Miranda Implications in State v. Wethered: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 13, 1988
Miranda Implications in State of Washington v. Wethered: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction State of Washington v. Michael Shawn Wethered (110 Wn. 2d 466) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Harmless Error in Multiple Acts Cases: Insights from STATE v. KITCHEN et al.

Clarifying Harmless Error in Multiple Acts Cases: Insights from STATE v. KITCHEN et al.

Date: May 6, 1988
Clarifying Harmless Error in Multiple Acts Cases: Insights from STATE v. KITCHEN et al. Introduction The landmark decision in The State of Washington v. James A. Kitchen et al., decided by the...
Reaffirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Age Discrimination Claims: Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound

Reaffirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Age Discrimination Claims: Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound

Date: Apr 15, 1988
Reaffirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Age Discrimination Claims: Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound Introduction Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc., 110 Wn. 2d 355 (1988), is a...
State v. Ciskie: Affirmation of Prosecution's Use of Battered Woman Syndrome Expert Testimony

State v. Ciskie: Affirmation of Prosecution's Use of Battered Woman Syndrome Expert Testimony

Date: Mar 18, 1988
State v. Ciskie: Affirmation of Prosecution's Use of Battered Woman Syndrome Expert Testimony Introduction State of Washington v. Darrell Paul Ciskie is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Adkins v. Aluminum Company of America: Establishing Precedents on Jury Conduct and Employer Liability

Adkins v. Aluminum Company of America: Establishing Precedents on Jury Conduct and Employer Liability

Date: Mar 4, 1988
Adkins v. Aluminum Company of America: Establishing Precedents on Jury Conduct and Employer Liability Introduction Adkins v. Aluminum Company of America (110 Wn. 2d 128) is a landmark decision by the...
STATE v. NG: Affirming Harmless Error in Confession Admission and Upholding Verdict Consistency

STATE v. NG: Affirming Harmless Error in Confession Admission and Upholding Verdict Consistency

Date: Feb 19, 1988
STATE v. NG: Affirming Harmless Error in Confession Admission and Upholding Verdict Consistency Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Wai-Chiu "Tony" Ng (110 Wn.2d 32), the...
STATE v. COE: Limiting the Admissibility of Hypnotically Enhanced Witness Identifications

STATE v. COE: Limiting the Admissibility of Hypnotically Enhanced Witness Identifications

Date: Jan 29, 1988
STATE v. COE: Limiting the Admissibility of Hypnotically Enhanced Witness Identifications Introduction In State of Washington v. Frederick H. Kevin Coe, 109 Wn. 2d 832 (1988), the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of Washington Rules that Personal Restraint Petition is Not a Prerequisite for Habeas Corpus Relief in Postconviction Proceedings

Supreme Court of Washington Rules that Personal Restraint Petition is Not a Prerequisite for Habeas Corpus Relief in Postconviction Proceedings

Date: Dec 11, 1987
Supreme Court of Washington Rules that Personal Restraint Petition is Not a Prerequisite for Habeas Corpus Relief in Postconviction Proceedings Introduction The case of Gary Wayne Toliver v. H. Dean...
Protecting Defendant's Right to Be Informed: State v. Chae San Pelkey Establishes Limits on Amendment of Criminal Charges During Trial

Protecting Defendant's Right to Be Informed: State v. Chae San Pelkey Establishes Limits on Amendment of Criminal Charges During Trial

Date: Nov 26, 1987
Protecting Defendant's Right to Be Informed: State v. Chae San Pelkey Establishes Limits on Amendment of Criminal Charges During Trial Introduction State of Washington v. Chae San Pelkey, 109 Wn. 2d...
Workers' Compensation Enhanced: Aggravation of Preexisting Conditions Recognized as Occupational Disease

Workers' Compensation Enhanced: Aggravation of Preexisting Conditions Recognized as Occupational Disease

Date: Nov 26, 1987
Workers' Compensation Enhanced: Aggravation of Preexisting Conditions Recognized as Occupational Disease Introduction In KENNETH E. DENNIS, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES,...
Affirming Collateral Estoppel: Binding Administrative Findings in Federal Civil Rights Actions

Affirming Collateral Estoppel: Binding Administrative Findings in Federal Civil Rights Actions

Date: Nov 26, 1987
Affirming Collateral Estoppel: Binding Administrative Findings in Federal Civil Rights Actions Introduction The case of Joe A. Shoemaker v. The City of Bremerton [109 Wn.2d 504] serves as a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert