Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Miranda Implications in State v. Wethered: A Comprehensive Analysis

Miranda Implications in State v. Wethered: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 13, 1988
Miranda Implications in State of Washington v. Wethered: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction State of Washington v. Michael Shawn Wethered (110 Wn. 2d 466) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Harmless Error in Multiple Acts Cases: Insights from STATE v. KITCHEN et al.

Clarifying Harmless Error in Multiple Acts Cases: Insights from STATE v. KITCHEN et al.

Date: May 6, 1988
Clarifying Harmless Error in Multiple Acts Cases: Insights from STATE v. KITCHEN et al. Introduction The landmark decision in The State of Washington v. James A. Kitchen et al., decided by the...
Reaffirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Age Discrimination Claims: Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound

Reaffirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Age Discrimination Claims: Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound

Date: Apr 15, 1988
Reaffirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Age Discrimination Claims: Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound Introduction Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc., 110 Wn. 2d 355 (1988), is a...
State v. Ciskie: Affirmation of Prosecution's Use of Battered Woman Syndrome Expert Testimony

State v. Ciskie: Affirmation of Prosecution's Use of Battered Woman Syndrome Expert Testimony

Date: Mar 18, 1988
State v. Ciskie: Affirmation of Prosecution's Use of Battered Woman Syndrome Expert Testimony Introduction State of Washington v. Darrell Paul Ciskie is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Adkins v. Aluminum Company of America: Establishing Precedents on Jury Conduct and Employer Liability

Adkins v. Aluminum Company of America: Establishing Precedents on Jury Conduct and Employer Liability

Date: Mar 4, 1988
Adkins v. Aluminum Company of America: Establishing Precedents on Jury Conduct and Employer Liability Introduction Adkins v. Aluminum Company of America (110 Wn. 2d 128) is a landmark decision by the...
STATE v. NG: Affirming Harmless Error in Confession Admission and Upholding Verdict Consistency

STATE v. NG: Affirming Harmless Error in Confession Admission and Upholding Verdict Consistency

Date: Feb 19, 1988
STATE v. NG: Affirming Harmless Error in Confession Admission and Upholding Verdict Consistency Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Wai-Chiu "Tony" Ng (110 Wn.2d 32), the...
STATE v. COE: Limiting the Admissibility of Hypnotically Enhanced Witness Identifications

STATE v. COE: Limiting the Admissibility of Hypnotically Enhanced Witness Identifications

Date: Jan 29, 1988
STATE v. COE: Limiting the Admissibility of Hypnotically Enhanced Witness Identifications Introduction In State of Washington v. Frederick H. Kevin Coe, 109 Wn. 2d 832 (1988), the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of Washington Rules that Personal Restraint Petition is Not a Prerequisite for Habeas Corpus Relief in Postconviction Proceedings

Supreme Court of Washington Rules that Personal Restraint Petition is Not a Prerequisite for Habeas Corpus Relief in Postconviction Proceedings

Date: Dec 11, 1987
Supreme Court of Washington Rules that Personal Restraint Petition is Not a Prerequisite for Habeas Corpus Relief in Postconviction Proceedings Introduction The case of Gary Wayne Toliver v. H. Dean...
Protecting Defendant's Right to Be Informed: State v. Chae San Pelkey Establishes Limits on Amendment of Criminal Charges During Trial

Protecting Defendant's Right to Be Informed: State v. Chae San Pelkey Establishes Limits on Amendment of Criminal Charges During Trial

Date: Nov 26, 1987
Protecting Defendant's Right to Be Informed: State v. Chae San Pelkey Establishes Limits on Amendment of Criminal Charges During Trial Introduction State of Washington v. Chae San Pelkey, 109 Wn. 2d...
Workers' Compensation Enhanced: Aggravation of Preexisting Conditions Recognized as Occupational Disease

Workers' Compensation Enhanced: Aggravation of Preexisting Conditions Recognized as Occupational Disease

Date: Nov 26, 1987
Workers' Compensation Enhanced: Aggravation of Preexisting Conditions Recognized as Occupational Disease Introduction In KENNETH E. DENNIS, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES,...
Affirming Collateral Estoppel: Binding Administrative Findings in Federal Civil Rights Actions

Affirming Collateral Estoppel: Binding Administrative Findings in Federal Civil Rights Actions

Date: Nov 26, 1987
Affirming Collateral Estoppel: Binding Administrative Findings in Federal Civil Rights Actions Introduction The case of Joe A. Shoemaker v. The City of Bremerton [109 Wn.2d 504] serves as a pivotal...
Rape Trauma Syndrome Admissibility: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Rape Trauma Syndrome Admissibility: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Nov 6, 1987
Rape Trauma Syndrome Admissibility: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Michael Earl Black (109 Wn. 2d 336, 1987), the Supreme...
Lockwood v. Raymark Industries: Establishing Continuing Duty to Warn in Asbestos Product Liability Cases

Lockwood v. Raymark Industries: Establishing Continuing Duty to Warn in Asbestos Product Liability Cases

Date: Oct 16, 1987
Lockwood v. Raymark Industries: Establishing Continuing Duty to Warn in Asbestos Product Liability Cases Introduction In Lockwood v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 109 Wn. 2d 235 (1987), the Supreme Court...
Deficient Counsel and Voluntary Intoxication: Insights from The State of Washington v. Kerry S. Thomas

Deficient Counsel and Voluntary Intoxication: Insights from The State of Washington v. Kerry S. Thomas

Date: Oct 9, 1987
Deficient Counsel and Voluntary Intoxication: Insights from The State of Washington v. Kerry S. Thomas Introduction The State of Washington v. Kerry S. Thomas is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Washington Supreme Court Refines "Same Criminal Conduct" Standard Under SRA

Washington Supreme Court Refines "Same Criminal Conduct" Standard Under SRA

Date: Oct 9, 1987
Washington Supreme Court Refines "Same Criminal Conduct" Standard Under Sentencing Reform Act Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. James T. Dunaway, along with related...
Expansion of 'Seller' Liability under Washington Securities Act in Haberman v. WPPSS

Expansion of 'Seller' Liability under Washington Securities Act in Haberman v. WPPSS

Date: Oct 9, 1987
Expansion of 'Seller' Liability under Washington Securities Act in Haberman v. WPPSS Introduction The case of Haberman et al., Appellants, v. Washington Public Power Supply System et al. (109 Wn. 2d...
State v. Schaaf et al. (1987): Upholding the Absence of Jury Trials in Juvenile Justice Proceedings

State v. Schaaf et al. (1987): Upholding the Absence of Jury Trials in Juvenile Justice Proceedings

Date: Sep 25, 1987
State v. Schaaf et al. (1987): Upholding the Absence of Jury Trials in Juvenile Justice Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Timothy Leland Schaaf et al. (No....
Establishing Concurrent Jurisdiction in Civil RICO Actions: Insights from Rice v. Janovich

Establishing Concurrent Jurisdiction in Civil RICO Actions: Insights from Rice v. Janovich

Date: Sep 25, 1987
Establishing Concurrent Jurisdiction in Civil RICO Actions: Insights from Rice v. Janovich Introduction Rice v. Janovich and Auty v. Ballard are consolidated cases adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
STATE v. RUPE: Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards

STATE v. RUPE: Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards

Date: Sep 18, 1987
STATE v. RUPE: Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards Introduction State of Washington v. Mitchell E. Rupe is a landmark decision delivered by the Supreme Court of Washington on September...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Precedent on Municipal Utility Authority and Gift Prohibition in Conservation Programs

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Precedent on Municipal Utility Authority and Gift Prohibition in Conservation Programs

Date: Aug 28, 1987
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Precedent on Municipal Utility Authority and Gift Prohibition in Conservation Programs Introduction In the landmark case The City of Tacoma v. The Taxpayers of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert