Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

State of Washington v. Jesus Abitia Enriquez: Upholding Sentencing Uniformity and Equal Protection

State of Washington v. Jesus Abitia Enriquez: Upholding Sentencing Uniformity and Equal Protection

Date: Oct 14, 1997
State of Washington v. Jesus Abitia Enriquez: Upholding Sentencing Uniformity and Equal Protection Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Jesus Abitia Enriquez, decided by...
NIVENS v. 7-11 Hoagy's Corner: Duty of Businesses to Protect Invitees from Third-Party Criminal Acts

NIVENS v. 7-11 Hoagy's Corner: Duty of Businesses to Protect Invitees from Third-Party Criminal Acts

Date: Sep 12, 1997
NIVENS v. 7-11 Hoagy's Corner: Duty of Businesses to Protect Invitees from Third-Party Criminal Acts Introduction NIVENS v. 7-11 Hoagy's Corner (133 Wn. 2d 192, 1997) is a landmark case decided by...
Porter v. State of Washington: Redefining 'Same Criminal Conduct' in Drug Delivery Sentencing

Porter v. State of Washington: Redefining 'Same Criminal Conduct' in Drug Delivery Sentencing

Date: Sep 5, 1997
Porter v. State of Washington: Redefining 'Same Criminal Conduct' in Drug Delivery Sentencing Introduction Case: The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Teresa M. Porter, Petitioner. Court: Supreme...
State of Washington v. Broadaway: Upholding Initiative 159's Single-Subject Compliance and Sentencing Procedures

State of Washington v. Broadaway: Upholding Initiative 159's Single-Subject Compliance and Sentencing Procedures

Date: Aug 22, 1997
State of Washington v. Broadaway: Upholding Initiative 159's Single-Subject Compliance and Sentencing Procedures Introduction State of Washington v. Nathaniel R. Broadaway is a landmark case...
Limits on Inferring Reckless Driving from Speed in Vehicular Homicide Convictions

Limits on Inferring Reckless Driving from Speed in Vehicular Homicide Convictions

Date: Aug 15, 1997
Limits on Inferring Reckless Driving from Speed in Vehicular Homicide Convictions Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Harmit P. Singh Randhawa, Appellant serves as a pivotal decision...
Defining 'Sexually Explicit Conduct': Washington Supreme Court Upholds RCW 9.68A.011(3)(e) in STATE v. MYERS

Defining 'Sexually Explicit Conduct': Washington Supreme Court Upholds RCW 9.68A.011(3)(e) in STATE v. MYERS

Date: Aug 8, 1997
Defining 'Sexually Explicit Conduct': Washington Supreme Court Upholds RCW 9.68A.011(3)(e) in STATE v. MYERS Introduction In the case of State of Washington v. Gary K. Myers, the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of Washington Limits on Geographical Restrictions in Parenting Plans

Supreme Court of Washington Limits on Geographical Restrictions in Parenting Plans

Date: Aug 8, 1997
Supreme Court of Washington Limits on Geographical Restrictions in Parenting Plans Introduction The landmark decision in In the Matter of the Marriage of Edmund W. Littlefield, Jr., and Charissa L.D....
Affirmation of Aggravated Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: Analysis of Evidence Admissibility under ER 404(b), Proportionality Review, and Death Qualification in Washington State

Affirmation of Aggravated Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: Analysis of Evidence Admissibility under ER 404(b), Proportionality Review, and Death Qualification in Washington State

Date: Jul 25, 1997
Affirmation of Aggravated Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: Analysis of Evidence Admissibility under ER 404(b), Proportionality Review, and Death Qualification in Washington State Introduction In...
State v. Stenson: Upholding Search Warrant Particularity and Death Sentence Standards

State v. Stenson: Upholding Search Warrant Particularity and Death Sentence Standards

Date: Jul 25, 1997
State v. Stenson: Upholding Search Warrant Particularity and Death Sentence Standards Introduction The State of Washington v. Darold Ray Stenson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Defining "Testifies" in Child Hearsay: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Defining "Testifies" in Child Hearsay: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Jul 4, 1997
Defining "Testifies" in Child Hearsay: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In The State of Washington v. Gregory Michael Rohrich, 132 Wn. 2d 472 (1997), the Supreme Court of...
Collateral Estoppel and Duress in Welfare Fraud: An Analysis of State v. Michele E. Williams

Collateral Estoppel and Duress in Welfare Fraud: An Analysis of State v. Michele E. Williams

Date: Jun 6, 1997
Collateral Estoppel and Duress in Welfare Fraud: An Analysis of State v. Michele E. Williams Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Michele E. Williams (132 Wn. 2d 248) adjudicated by...
Taxpayer Standing and Municipal Ordinance Compliance in Street Vacation Cases: Analysis of Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of Seattle

Taxpayer Standing and Municipal Ordinance Compliance in Street Vacation Cases: Analysis of Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of Seattle

Date: Jun 6, 1997
Taxpayer Standing and Municipal Ordinance Compliance in Street Vacation Cases: Analysis of Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of Seattle Introduction Greater Harbor 2000, et al. v. The City of Seattle, et...
Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Standards for Jury Verdicts on General and Special Damages in Personal Injury Cases

Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Standards for Jury Verdicts on General and Special Damages in Personal Injury Cases

Date: May 30, 1997
Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Standards for Jury Verdicts on General and Special Damages in Personal Injury Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Pamela S. Palmer, Individually and as...
STATE v. MICHIELLI: Affirming Concurrent Theft and Trafficking Charges and the Proper Application of CrR 8.3(b) for Dismissal

STATE v. MICHIELLI: Affirming Concurrent Theft and Trafficking Charges and the Proper Application of CrR 8.3(b) for Dismissal

Date: May 30, 1997
STATE v. MICHIELLI: Affirming Concurrent Theft and Trafficking Charges and the Proper Application of CrR 8.3(b) for Dismissal Introduction State of Washington appealed the dismissal of three counts...
Proper Calculation of Standard Range in Exceptional Sentencing: STATE v. PARKER

Proper Calculation of Standard Range in Exceptional Sentencing: STATE v. PARKER

Date: May 23, 1997
Proper Calculation of Standard Range in Exceptional Sentencing: STATE v. PARKER Introduction In The State of Washington v. Larry D. Parker (132 Wn.2d 182, 1997), the Supreme Court of Washington...
Access to Non-Testimonial Audio Evidence During Jury Deliberations: Insights from State v. Castellanos

Access to Non-Testimonial Audio Evidence During Jury Deliberations: Insights from State v. Castellanos

Date: May 9, 1997
Access to Non-Testimonial Audio Evidence During Jury Deliberations: Insights from State v. Castellanos Introduction State of Washington vs. Edelmira G. Castellanos is a landmark case decided by the...
Due Process Violation through Improper Jury Instruction on School Status in Drug Zone Enhancements

Due Process Violation through Improper Jury Instruction on School Status in Drug Zone Enhancements

Date: May 2, 1997
Due Process Violation through Improper Jury Instruction on School Status in Drug Zone Enhancements Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Donald F. Becker, 132 Wn. 2d 54...
Regulating Adult Cabarets: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue

Regulating Adult Cabarets: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue

Date: May 2, 1997
Regulating Adult Cabarets: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue Introduction In the landmark case Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue (132 Wn. 2d 103), the Supreme Court of...
Regulatory Takings and Just Compensation: Insights from Sintra, Inc. v. City of Seattle

Regulatory Takings and Just Compensation: Insights from Sintra, Inc. v. City of Seattle

Date: Apr 18, 1997
Regulatory Takings and Just Compensation: Insights from Sintra, Inc. v. City of Seattle Introduction Sintra, Inc., et al., v. The City of Seattle, et al. (131 Wn. 2d 640) is a pivotal case...
Restrictive Covenants and Reasonable Authority: RISS v. ANGEL Establishes Limits on Homeowners' Associations' Approval Power

Restrictive Covenants and Reasonable Authority: RISS v. ANGEL Establishes Limits on Homeowners' Associations' Approval Power

Date: Apr 11, 1997
Restrictive Covenants and Reasonable Authority: RISS v. ANGEL Establishes Limits on Homeowners' Associations' Approval Power Introduction In the landmark case of RISS v. ANGEL, the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert