Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

First-Party Bad Faith Claims Recognized in Washington: Coventry Associates v. American States Insurance Co.

First-Party Bad Faith Claims Recognized in Washington: Coventry Associates v. American States Insurance Co.

Date: Sep 4, 1998
First-Party Bad Faith Claims Recognized in Washington: Coventry Associates v. American States Insurance Co. Introduction Covenant Associates v. American States Insurance Company is a landmark...
State v. Ferrier: Washington Supreme Court Strengthens Home Privacy Rights by Mandating Police to Advise of Right to Refuse Consent

State v. Ferrier: Washington Supreme Court Strengthens Home Privacy Rights by Mandating Police to Advise of Right to Refuse Consent

Date: Aug 28, 1998
State v. Ferrier: Washington Supreme Court Strengthens Home Privacy Rights by Mandating Police to Advise of Right to Refuse Consent Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Debra...
Discovery Rule Applied to Toxic Torts in Green v. APC

Discovery Rule Applied to Toxic Torts in Green v. APC

Date: Aug 21, 1998
Discovery Rule Applied to Toxic Torts in Green v. A.P.C. Introduction Green v. A.P.C., 136 Wn.2d 87 (1998), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington. This case addresses...
Expanding Bystander Recovery for Emotional Distress: Insights from HEGEL v. MCMAHON

Expanding Bystander Recovery for Emotional Distress: Insights from HEGEL v. MCMAHON

Date: Aug 21, 1998
Expanding Bystander Recovery for Emotional Distress: Insights from HEGEL v. MCMAHON Introduction The case of Christine Hegel, as Guardian, et al. v. Brett M. McMahon, et al., adjudicated by the...
Defining "Agricultural Lands" under the Growth Management Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound GMHB

Defining "Agricultural Lands" under the Growth Management Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound GMHB

Date: Aug 7, 1998
Defining "Agricultural Lands" under the Growth Management Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board Introduction The case City of...
Affirmation of Exclusion of Defense Expert Testimony as a Discovery Sanction in Diminished Capacity Defense – STATE v. HUTCHINSON

Affirmation of Exclusion of Defense Expert Testimony as a Discovery Sanction in Diminished Capacity Defense – STATE v. HUTCHINSON

Date: Jul 31, 1998
Affirmation of Exclusion of Defense Expert Testimony as a Discovery Sanction in Diminished Capacity Defense Introduction In The State of Washington v. Darrin Rand Hutchinson, Sr., the Supreme Court...
ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick: Affirming Comparative Fault in Negligent Misrepresentation

ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick: Affirming Comparative Fault in Negligent Misrepresentation

Date: Jul 24, 1998
ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick: Affirming Comparative Fault in Negligent Misrepresentation Introduction The case of ESCA Corporation, et al. v. KPMG Peat Marwick serves as a pivotal judicial...
Narrowing Employer Immunity and Duty of Care: An Analysis of Thorabelle v. Burger King

Narrowing Employer Immunity and Duty of Care: An Analysis of Thorabelle v. Burger King

Date: Jul 10, 1998
Narrowing Employer Immunity and Duty of Care: An Analysis of Thorabelle v. Burger King Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington's decision in Thorabelle I. Folsom, as Personal Representative v....
Limitations on Growth Management Hearings Boards' Authority to Invalidate Pre-Enactment Zoning Ordinances Under Washington’s Growth Management Act

Limitations on Growth Management Hearings Boards' Authority to Invalidate Pre-Enactment Zoning Ordinances Under Washington’s Growth Management Act

Date: Jun 26, 1998
Limitations on Growth Management Hearings Boards' Authority to Invalidate Pre-Enactment Zoning Ordinances Under Washington’s Growth Management Act Introduction The case of Skagit Surveyors and...
Fraud and Undue Influence in Probate and Marriage: Analysis of Estelle Champoux Lint v. Christian Lint

Fraud and Undue Influence in Probate and Marriage: Analysis of Estelle Champoux Lint v. Christian Lint

Date: Jun 26, 1998
Fraud and Undue Influence in Probate and Marriage: Analysis of Estelle Champoux Lint v. Christian Lint Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Estate of Estelle Champoux Lint v. Christian Lint...
Closed-Circuit Testimony for Child Witnesses Upholds Confrontation Rights Under RCW 9A.44.150

Closed-Circuit Testimony for Child Witnesses Upholds Confrontation Rights Under RCW 9A.44.150

Date: Jun 12, 1998
Closed-Circuit Testimony for Child Witnesses Upholds Confrontation Rights Under RCW 9A.44.150 Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Boyd Allen Foster (1998), the Supreme...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Objective Test for Disturbance of Private Affairs under Article I, Section 7

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Objective Test for Disturbance of Private Affairs under Article I, Section 7

Date: Jun 12, 1998
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Objective Test for Disturbance of Private Affairs under Article I, Section 7 Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Kevin Young, adjudicated by the...
Supreme Court of Washington Upholds Monitoring Tools in Community Placement for Sex Offenders

Supreme Court of Washington Upholds Monitoring Tools in Community Placement for Sex Offenders

Date: Jun 5, 1998
Supreme Court of Washington Upholds Monitoring Tools in Community Placement for Sex Offenders Introduction In the landmark decision of The State of Washington v. Roland Erik Riles and The State of...
State Farm Must Share Legal Expenses with Insureds in PIP Subrogation Cases: Washington Supreme Court Decision

State Farm Must Share Legal Expenses with Insureds in PIP Subrogation Cases: Washington Supreme Court Decision

Date: Jun 5, 1998
State Farm Must Share Legal Expenses with Insureds in PIP Subrogation Cases: Washington Supreme Court Decision Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of Elaine Mahler, et al. v....
Collateral Estoppel and the Right to a Jury Trial: Insights from Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical Clinic

Collateral Estoppel and the Right to a Jury Trial: Insights from Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical Clinic

Date: May 29, 1998
Collateral Estoppel and the Right to a Jury Trial: Insights from Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical Clinic Introduction Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical Clinic, Inc., 135 Wn. 2d 255 (1998), is a...
Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Consecutive vs. Concurrent Firearm Enhancements under SRA

Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Consecutive vs. Concurrent Firearm Enhancements under SRA

Date: May 29, 1998
Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Consecutive vs. Concurrent Firearm Enhancements under SRA Introduction The landmark decision in In the Matter of the Post Sentencing Review of Guy L. Charles and...
Equitable Tolling in Statutory Redemption: Insights from MILLAY v. CAM

Equitable Tolling in Statutory Redemption: Insights from MILLAY v. CAM

Date: May 22, 1998
Equitable Tolling in Statutory Redemption: Insights from MILLAY v. CAM Introduction MILLAY v. CAM is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in 1998. The case revolves around...
Affirmation of Arbitration Award Finality under Washington's RCW 7.04 in DAVIDSON v. HENSEN

Affirmation of Arbitration Award Finality under Washington's RCW 7.04 in DAVIDSON v. HENSEN

Date: May 8, 1998
Affirmation of Arbitration Award Finality under Washington's RCW 7.04 in DAVIDSON v. HENSEN Introduction Case: Samuel Davidson, et al., Petitioners, v. Bruce Hensen, et al., Respondents. Court:...
Establishing Venue as a Critical Element in Insurance Fraud Cases: Insights from STATE v. HICKMAN

Establishing Venue as a Critical Element in Insurance Fraud Cases: Insights from STATE v. HICKMAN

Date: May 1, 1998
Establishing Venue as a Critical Element in Insurance Fraud Cases: Insights from State of Washington v. James D. Hickman Introduction State of Washington v. James D. Hickman is a pivotal case...
Relation Back Doctrine in Wrongful Death Actions: John Beal v. City of Seattle

Relation Back Doctrine in Wrongful Death Actions: John Beal v. City of Seattle

Date: Apr 3, 1998
Relation Back Doctrine in Wrongful Death Actions: John Beal v. City of Seattle Introduction In the landmark case of John Beal, as Guardian, Petitioner, v. The City of Seattle, et al., decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert