Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Prior Acts under ER 404(b): Washington Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Decision in STATE v. WADE

Admissibility of Prior Acts under ER 404(b): Washington Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Decision in STATE v. WADE

Date: Jul 9, 1999
Admissibility of Prior Acts under ER 404(b): Washington Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Decision in STATE v. WADE Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Charles Fidel Wade (138 Wn....
Pretextual Traffic Stops Violate Washington Constitution's Article I, Section 7: Analysis of STATE v. LADSON

Pretextual Traffic Stops Violate Washington Constitution's Article I, Section 7: Analysis of STATE v. LADSON

Date: Jul 2, 1999
Pretextual Traffic Stops Violate Washington Constitution's Article I, Section 7: Analysis of STATE v. LADSON Introduction In State of Washington v. Thomas L. Ladson, 138 Wn. 2d 343 (1999), the...
Stipulation to Exceptional Sentences in Plea Agreements: Insights from In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Lawrence Breedlove

Stipulation to Exceptional Sentences in Plea Agreements: Insights from In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Lawrence Breedlove

Date: Jun 25, 1999
Stipulation to Exceptional Sentences in Plea Agreements: Insights from In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Lawrence Breedlove Introduction The case of In re the Personal Restraint Petition of...
Duty to Protect by Probation and Pretrial Release Counselors: Expanding Taggart Precedent

Duty to Protect by Probation and Pretrial Release Counselors: Expanding Taggart Precedent

Date: Jun 25, 1999
Duty to Protect by Probation and Pretrial Release Counselors: Expanding Taggart Precedent Introduction In HERTOG v. CITY OF SEATTLE and King County (138 Wn. 2d 265, 1999), the Supreme Court of...
Inability to Relitigate Minor Infractions in Serious Infraction Hearings: Insights from Gronquist v. Washington Supreme Court

Inability to Relitigate Minor Infractions in Serious Infraction Hearings: Insights from Gronquist v. Washington Supreme Court

Date: Jun 25, 1999
Inability to Relitigate Minor Infractions in Serious Infraction Hearings: Insights from Gronquist v. Washington Supreme Court Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Derek...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Treatment of Social Security Benefits in Marital Property Division – In re MARRIAGE OF ZAHM

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Treatment of Social Security Benefits in Marital Property Division – In re MARRIAGE OF ZAHM

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Treatment of Social Security Benefits in Marital Property Division – In re MARRIAGE OF ZAHM Introduction The case In re the Marriage of L. Dianne Zahm and Kermit...
Limiting Probable Cause for Drug-Related Home Searches: STATE v. THEIN Establishes Specific Nexus Requirement

Limiting Probable Cause for Drug-Related Home Searches: STATE v. THEIN Establishes Specific Nexus Requirement

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Limiting Probable Cause for Drug-Related Home Searches: STATE v. THEIN Establishes Specific Nexus Requirement Introduction State of Washington v. Steve A. Thein is a landmark case decided by the...
Workers' Compensation Causation: Washington Supreme Court Sets Precedent in RUSE v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR INDUStries

Workers' Compensation Causation: Washington Supreme Court Sets Precedent in RUSE v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR INDUStries

Date: Jun 4, 1999
Workers' Compensation Causation: Washington Supreme Court Sets Precedent in RUSE v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR INDUStries Introduction Case: Everett L. Ruse, Petitioner, v. The Department of Labor...
Reconciliation Does Not Nullify Legal Separation Decree: Insights from In Re The Marriage of Lela L. Moody and Homer Moody, Jr.

Reconciliation Does Not Nullify Legal Separation Decree: Insights from In Re The Marriage of Lela L. Moody and Homer Moody, Jr.

Date: May 28, 1999
Reconciliation Does Not Nullify Legal Separation Decree: Insights from In Re The Marriage of Lela L. Moody and Homer Moody, Jr. Introduction In Re The Marriage of Lela L. Moody, Respondent, and Homer...
Washington Supreme Court Affirms 'Juvenile' Includes 18-20-Year-Olds in Driver's License Suspension Statutes

Washington Supreme Court Affirms 'Juvenile' Includes 18-20-Year-Olds in Driver's License Suspension Statutes

Date: May 28, 1999
Washington Supreme Court Affirms 'Juvenile' Includes 18-20-Year-Olds in Driver's License Suspension Statutes Introduction The case of Brett Davis v. State of Washington addresses the application of...
State v. Riley: Upholding Aggressor Instruction in Self-Defense Claims

State v. Riley: Upholding Aggressor Instruction in Self-Defense Claims

Date: May 14, 1999
State v. Riley: Upholding Aggressor Instruction in Self-Defense Claims Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Johnny Lee Riley, Jr., the Supreme Court of Washington addressed...
Termination of Parental Rights Confirmed Despite Proposed Guardianship: Clarifications on RCW 13.34.180(6)

Termination of Parental Rights Confirmed Despite Proposed Guardianship: Clarifications on RCW 13.34.180(6)

Date: May 14, 1999
Termination of Parental Rights Confirmed Despite Proposed Guardianship: Clarifications on RCW 13.34.180(6) Introduction The case of In re Dependency of K.S.C., B.D. 11/02/92, Minor Child. Beverly...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Separate Property Status for Post-Dissolution Disability Benefits

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Separate Property Status for Post-Dissolution Disability Benefits

Date: May 7, 1999
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Separate Property Status for Post-Dissolution Disability Benefits Introduction In the landmark case In re Marriage of Michael A. Brewer v. Deborah Q. Brewer,...
Impact of Defendant Shackling on Capital Sentencing: A Commentary on State of Washington v. Charles Ben Finch

Impact of Defendant Shackling on Capital Sentencing: A Commentary on State of Washington v. Charles Ben Finch

Date: May 7, 1999
Impact of Defendant Shackling on Capital Sentencing: A Commentary on State of Washington v. Charles Ben Finch Introduction State of Washington v. Charles Ben Finch is a pivotal case decided by the...
Due Process Protection Against Retrospective Application of Statutory Changes in Child Molestation Cases – State v. Fonua Aho

Due Process Protection Against Retrospective Application of Statutory Changes in Child Molestation Cases – State v. Fonua Aho

Date: Apr 23, 1999
Due Process Protection Against Retrospective Application of Statutory Changes in Child Molestation Cases – State v. Fonua Aho Introduction State of Washington v. Fonua Aho is a pivotal case decided...
State v. Bencivenga: Affirming Rational Inference of Intent in Attempted Burglary Under Washington Law

State v. Bencivenga: Affirming Rational Inference of Intent in Attempted Burglary Under Washington Law

Date: Apr 16, 1999
State v. Bencivenga: Affirming Rational Inference of Intent in Attempted Burglary Under Washington Law Introduction State of Washington v. James Bencivenga, 137 Wn.2d 703 (1999), is a pivotal case...
No Accomplice Liability for Omissions: STATE v. JACKSON Establishes Limits under Washington Law

No Accomplice Liability for Omissions: STATE v. JACKSON Establishes Limits under Washington Law

Date: Apr 16, 1999
No Accomplice Liability for Omissions: STATE v. JACKSON Establishes Limits under Washington Law Introduction State of Washington v. Michael A. Jackson and Laurinda J. Jackson is a landmark case...
Foreseeability Not Required for Restitution in Criminal Cases: An Analysis of STATE v. ENSTONE

Foreseeability Not Required for Restitution in Criminal Cases: An Analysis of STATE v. ENSTONE

Date: Apr 16, 1999
Foreseeability Not Required for Restitution in Criminal Cases: An Analysis of State of Washington v. Enstone Introduction State of Washington v. Douglas Enstone, 137 Wn.2d 675 (1999), is a seminal...
Application of Berg Context Rule to Restrictive Covenants in Washington State

Application of Berg Context Rule to Restrictive Covenants in Washington State

Date: Apr 16, 1999
Application of Berg Context Rule to Restrictive Covenants in Washington State Introduction In the landmark case of HOLLIS v. GARWALL, INC., the Supreme Court of Washington addressed the applicability...
Clarification of the Invited Error Doctrine in Jury Instructions on Self-Defense

Clarification of the Invited Error Doctrine in Jury Instructions on Self-Defense

Date: Apr 2, 1999
Clarification of the Invited Error Doctrine in Jury Instructions on Self-Defense Introduction The case at hand involves six consolidated appeals before the Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert