Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Limitations on State-Provided Counsel for Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawals under CrR 3.1(b)(2)

Limitations on State-Provided Counsel for Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawals under CrR 3.1(b)(2)

Date: Feb 25, 2005
Limitations on State-Provided Counsel for Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawals under CrR 3.1(b)(2) Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Tony Douglas Robinson, 153 Wn. 2d 689...
Stock Option Conversion Upon Exercise: Washington Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Stock Option Conversion Upon Exercise: Washington Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Date: Feb 11, 2005
Stock Option Conversion Upon Exercise: Washington Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Marriage of Margo R. Langham and Velle J. Kolde, adjudicated by...
Affirmation of "Reckless Manner" Definition in Vehicular Offenses

Affirmation of "Reckless Manner" Definition in Vehicular Offenses

Date: Feb 11, 2005
Affirmation of "Reckless Manner" Definition in Vehicular Offenses Introduction In the landmark case THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. MICHAEL ROGGENKAMP, decided by the Supreme Court of Washington on...
Supreme Court of Washington Mandates Free Delivery of Inmate Property Upon Transfer

Supreme Court of Washington Mandates Free Delivery of Inmate Property Upon Transfer

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Supreme Court of Washington Mandates Free Delivery of Inmate Property Upon Transfer Introduction In the landmark case of LONNIE BURTON ET AL. v. JOSEPH LEHMAN, as Secretary of the Department of...
Knowledge Not Required for Firearm Enhancement in Sentencing: Analysis of State v. Barnes

Knowledge Not Required for Firearm Enhancement in Sentencing: Analysis of State v. Barnes

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Knowledge Not Required for Firearm Enhancement in Sentencing: Analysis of State v. Barnes Introduction State of Washington v. Erik Vincent Barnes, 153 Wn. 2d 378 (2005), is a pivotal case in...
Severability Clauses in Arbitration Agreements: The Therese R. Zuver Case

Severability Clauses in Arbitration Agreements: The Therese R. Zuver Case

Date: Dec 24, 2004
Severability Clauses in Arbitration Agreements: The Therese R. Zuver Case Introduction In the landmark case of Therese R. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc., et al., 153 Wn. 2d 293 (2004), the...
Enforceability of Employment Arbitration Agreements: Insights from Adler v. Fred Lind Manor

Enforceability of Employment Arbitration Agreements: Insights from Adler v. Fred Lind Manor

Date: Dec 24, 2004
Enforceability of Employment Arbitration Agreements: Insights from Adler v. Fred Lind Manor Introduction The case of Gerard Adler v. Fred Lind Manor et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Washington...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Unified Approach to Hostile Work Environment Claims in Antonius v. King County

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Unified Approach to Hostile Work Environment Claims in Antonius v. King County

Date: Dec 24, 2004
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Unified Approach to Hostile Work Environment Claims in Antonius v. King County Introduction In Rose Antonius v. King County, 153 Wn.2d 256 (2004), the Supreme...
Establishing 'Clear, Cogent, and Convincing' Evidence Standard for Lost Wills and Clarifying Res Judicata in Probate: In re Estate of Margaret Black

Establishing 'Clear, Cogent, and Convincing' Evidence Standard for Lost Wills and Clarifying Res Judicata in Probate: In re Estate of Margaret Black

Date: Dec 10, 2004
Establishing 'Clear, Cogent, and Convincing' Evidence Standard for Lost Wills and Clarifying Res Judicata in Probate: In re Estate of Margaret Black Introduction In the landmark case In the Matter of...
Limits on Consent Searches and Defense Counsel’s Duty to Challenge Illegal Seizures: State v. Reichenbach

Limits on Consent Searches and Defense Counsel’s Duty to Challenge Illegal Seizures: State v. Reichenbach

Date: Nov 25, 2004
Limits on Consent Searches and Defense Counsel’s Duty to Challenge Illegal Seizures: State v. Reichenbach Introduction In The State of Washington v. Steven I. Reichenbach, the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Invalidity of Second Degree Felony Murder Convictions Based on Assault

Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Invalidity of Second Degree Felony Murder Convictions Based on Assault

Date: Nov 19, 2004
Invalidity of Second Degree Felony Murder Convictions Based on Assault: A Comprehensive Analysis of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of JESSE HINTON, ET AL. Introduction The case of Jesse...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Non-Retroactive Application of SRA Amendments on Juvenile Convictions

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Non-Retroactive Application of SRA Amendments on Juvenile Convictions

Date: Nov 19, 2004
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Non-Retroactive Application of SRA Amendments on Juvenile Convictions Introduction In the landmark case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Christopher...
Ensuring Public Trial Rights and Preventing Double Jeopardy: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Orange

Ensuring Public Trial Rights and Preventing Double Jeopardy: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Orange

Date: Nov 11, 2004
Ensuring Public Trial Rights and Preventing Double Jeopardy: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Orange Introduction In State v. Orange, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed critical issues...
Independent Consideration Required for Post-Employment Noncompete Agreements

Independent Consideration Required for Post-Employment Noncompete Agreements

Date: Nov 11, 2004
Independent Consideration Required for Post-Employment Noncompete Agreements Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in Anthony A. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc. (152 Wn.2d 828, 2004),...
Affirming Conviction but Remanding for Penalty Phase: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in the Shackling of Cecil Emile Davis

Affirming Conviction but Remanding for Penalty Phase: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in the Shackling of Cecil Emile Davis

Date: Nov 5, 2004
Affirming Conviction but Remanding for Penalty Phase: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in the Shackling of Cecil Emile Davis Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Washington's...
Reaffirming Strict Liability for Unlawful Possession of Controlled Substances in Washington State

Reaffirming Strict Liability for Unlawful Possession of Controlled Substances in Washington State

Date: Oct 15, 2004
Reaffirming Strict Liability for Unlawful Possession of Controlled Substances in Washington State Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Donald Edward Bradshaw and Christian...
Redetermination of Probable Cause in Search Warrants: The Maddox Decision

Redetermination of Probable Cause in Search Warrants: The Maddox Decision

Date: Oct 15, 2004
Redetermination of Probable Cause in Search Warrants: The Maddox Decision Introduction In the landmark case The State of Washington v. Christopher Dorian Maddox, 152 Wn.2d 499 (2004), the Supreme...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Validity of Settlement Offers Without Itemization and 30-Day Period in Eminent Domain Cases

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Validity of Settlement Offers Without Itemization and 30-Day Period in Eminent Domain Cases

Date: Oct 8, 2004
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Validity of Settlement Offers Without Itemization and 30-Day Period in Eminent Domain Cases Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Elroy Costich (152...
Clarifying Accomplice Liability in Jury Instructions: Insights from STATE v. TEAL

Clarifying Accomplice Liability in Jury Instructions: Insights from STATE v. TEAL

Date: Sep 3, 2004
Clarifying Accomplice Liability in Jury Instructions: Insights from STATE v. TEAL Introduction STATE v. TEAL, 152 Wn. 2d 333, is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Washington that addresses...
Reaffirmation of Collateral Estoppel in Wrongful Discharge Claims: CHRISTENSEN v. GRANT COUNTY HOSPital District No. 1

Reaffirmation of Collateral Estoppel in Wrongful Discharge Claims: CHRISTENSEN v. GRANT COUNTY HOSPital District No. 1

Date: Aug 27, 2004
Reaffirmation of Collateral Estoppel in Wrongful Discharge Claims: CHRISTENSEN v. GRANT COUNTY HOSPital District No. 1 Introduction In the landmark case of Kimball D. CHRISTENSEN v. GRANT COUNTY...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert