Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Preenforcement Vagueness Challenges in Community Custody Conditions: Insights from STATE v. BAHL

Preenforcement Vagueness Challenges in Community Custody Conditions: Insights from STATE v. BAHL

Date: Oct 10, 2008
Preenforcement Vagueness Challenges in Community Custody Conditions: Insights from STATE v. BAHL Introduction State of Washington v. Eric G. Bahl, 164 Wn. 2d 739 (2008), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Merger Doctrine Applied in State v. Kier: Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Robbery and Assault Cases

Merger Doctrine Applied in State v. Kier: Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Robbery and Assault Cases

Date: Oct 10, 2008
Merger Doctrine Applied in State v. Kier: Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Robbery and Assault Cases Introduction State of Washington v. Herbert John Kier, 164 Wn.2d 798 (2008), adjudicated by the...
Washington State Recognizes Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment for Domestic Violence Victims

Washington State Recognizes Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment for Domestic Violence Victims

Date: Oct 4, 2008
Washington State Recognizes Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment for Domestic Violence Victims Introduction The case of Ramona Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. (165 Wn. 2d 200)...
Apparent Authority and Duty of Care in Public Administration: Analysis of Ranger Insurance Co. v. Pierce County

Apparent Authority and Duty of Care in Public Administration: Analysis of Ranger Insurance Co. v. Pierce County

Date: Sep 19, 2008
Apparent Authority and Duty of Care in Public Administration: Analysis of Ranger Insurance Company v. Pierce County Introduction Ranger Insurance Company v. Pierce County (164 Wn.2d 545, 2008) is a...
Judicial Estoppel and Bankruptcy Trustee Substitution: Insights from MILLER v. CAMPBELL

Judicial Estoppel and Bankruptcy Trustee Substitution: Insights from MILLER v. CAMPBELL

Date: Sep 19, 2008
Judicial Estoppel and Bankruptcy Trustee Substitution: Insights from MILLER v. CAMPBELL Introduction The case of Michael Miller v. Charles Campbell, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington on...
Exceptional Sentencing Under RCW 9.94A.535(2)(c) Upholds Sixth Amendment Rights

Exceptional Sentencing Under RCW 9.94A.535(2)(c) Upholds Sixth Amendment Rights

Date: Sep 19, 2008
Exceptional Sentencing Under RCW 9.94A.535(2)(c) Upholds Sixth Amendment Rights Introduction In the case of The State of Washington v. Alexander Hill Alvarado, the Supreme Court of Washington...
Smoking Bans Extended to Private Places of Employment: Upholding Washington's Smoking in Public Places Act

Smoking Bans Extended to Private Places of Employment: Upholding Washington's Smoking in Public Places Act

Date: Sep 12, 2008
Smoking Bans Extended to Private Places of Employment: Upholding Washington's Smoking in Public Places Act Introduction In the case of American Legion Post No. 149 v. The Department of Health Et Al.,...
Young v. Young et al.: Defining the Full Measure of Recovery in Unjust Enrichment Claims for Property Improvements

Young v. Young et al.: Defining the Full Measure of Recovery in Unjust Enrichment Claims for Property Improvements

Date: Sep 12, 2008
Young v. Young et al.: Defining the Full Measure of Recovery in Unjust Enrichment Claims for Property Improvements Introduction In Young v. Young et al., 164 Wn.2d 477 (2008), the Supreme Court of...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Distinction Between Selective and Late Tender Rules in Insurance Contribution and Subrogation Claims

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Distinction Between Selective and Late Tender Rules in Insurance Contribution and Subrogation Claims

Date: Sep 5, 2008
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Distinction Between Selective and Late Tender Rules in Insurance Contribution and Subrogation Claims Introduction The case of MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE...
Waiver of 'Jeopardy' Element in Wrongful Discharge Under Public Policy: Fluor v. Brundridge

Waiver of 'Jeopardy' Element in Wrongful Discharge Under Public Policy: Fluor v. Brundridge

Date: Sep 5, 2008
Waiver of 'Jeopardy' Element in Wrongful Discharge Under Public Policy: Fluor v. Brundridge Introduction In the landmark case of Scott Brundridge et al. v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc., the Supreme...
Washington Supreme Court Declares AT&T's Class Action Waiver Unconscionable Under Consumer Protection Act

Washington Supreme Court Declares AT&T's Class Action Waiver Unconscionable Under Consumer Protection Act

Date: Aug 29, 2008
Washington Supreme Court Declares AT&T's Class Action Waiver Unconscionable Under Consumer Protection Act Introduction In the landmark case Michael McKee, Indi v. AT&T Corporation, adjudicated by the...
Refinery Gas Use for Heat Subject to Hazardous Substance Tax: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Taxable Possession Criteria

Refinery Gas Use for Heat Subject to Hazardous Substance Tax: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Taxable Possession Criteria

Date: Aug 15, 2008
Refinery Gas Use for Heat Subject to Hazardous Substance Tax: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Taxable Possession Criteria Introduction The case of Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company v....
Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts to Evaluate Victim Credibility in Domestic Violence Cases: Analysis of STATE v. MAGERS

Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts to Evaluate Victim Credibility in Domestic Violence Cases: Analysis of STATE v. MAGERS

Date: Jul 25, 2008
Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts to Evaluate Victim Credibility in Domestic Violence Cases: Analysis of STATE v. MAGERS Introduction The State of Washington v. Kha Dann Magers. is a pivotal case...
Limitations on Opinion Testimony and Missing Witness Instructions in Criminal Trials: State v. Montgomery

Limitations on Opinion Testimony and Missing Witness Instructions in Criminal Trials: State v. Montgomery

Date: May 16, 2008
Limitations on Opinion Testimony and Missing Witness Instructions in Criminal Trials: State v. Montgomery Introduction State of Washington v. Virgil R. Montgomery is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Enhanced Standards for Terry Stops: Analysis of State v. Gatewood

Enhanced Standards for Terry Stops: Analysis of State v. Gatewood

Date: May 2, 2008
Enhanced Standards for Terry Stops: Analysis of State v. Gatewood Introduction State of Washington v. Gary Nathaniel Gatewood (163 Wn. 2d 534) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
No Harmless Error Analysis for Unsubmitted Sentencing Factors in Washington: STATE v. RECUENCO

No Harmless Error Analysis for Unsubmitted Sentencing Factors in Washington: STATE v. RECUENCO

Date: Apr 18, 2008
No Harmless Error Analysis for Unsubmitted Sentencing Factors in Washington: STATE v. RECUENCO Introduction The State of Washington v. Arturo R. Recuenco, 163 Wn.2d 428 (2008), adjudicated by the...
Termination of Parental Rights in the Welfare of M.R.H. ET AL.: Establishing Precedents under RCW 13.34.180

Termination of Parental Rights in the Welfare of M.R.H. ET AL.: Establishing Precedents under RCW 13.34.180

Date: Mar 26, 2008
Termination of Parental Rights in the Welfare of M.R.H. ET AL.: Establishing Precedents under RCW 13.34.180 Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Welfare of M.R.H. ET AL. (145 Wn. App. 10),...
Limitations on the Use of Prearrest Silence as Substantive Evidence of Guilt: STATE v. BURKE

Limitations on the Use of Prearrest Silence as Substantive Evidence of Guilt: STATE v. BURKE

Date: Mar 14, 2008
Limitations on the Use of Prearrest Silence as Substantive Evidence of Guilt: STATE v. BURKE Introduction In the landmark case STATE v. BURKE, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed the...
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product in Public Records Requests: Analysis of Cody Soter et al. v. Cowles Publishing Co.

Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product in Public Records Requests: Analysis of Cody Soter et al. v. Cowles Publishing Co.

Date: Dec 28, 2007
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product in Public Records Requests: Analysis of Cody Soter et al. v. Cowles Publishing Co. Introduction The case of Cody Soter et al. v. Cowles...
Merger Doctrine and Negligent Misrepresentation: Insights from Ross v. Kirner

Merger Doctrine and Negligent Misrepresentation: Insights from Ross v. Kirner

Date: Dec 14, 2007
Merger Doctrine and Negligent Misrepresentation: Insights from Ross v. Kirner Introduction In the landmark case of FRED A. Ross ET AL. v. JOHN F. KIRNER ET AL. (162 Wn. 2d 493, 2007), the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert