Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Comprehensive Analysis of Lee H. Rousso v. The State of Washington: Upholding the Dormant Commerce Clause in Internet Gambling Regulation

Comprehensive Analysis of Lee H. Rousso v. The State of Washington: Upholding the Dormant Commerce Clause in Internet Gambling Regulation

Date: Sep 24, 2010
Comprehensive Analysis of Lee H. Rousso v. The State of Washington: Upholding the Dormant Commerce Clause in Internet Gambling Regulation Introduction The case of Lee H. Rousso v. The State of...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Penalties for PRA Exemption Misconduct

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Penalties for PRA Exemption Misconduct

Date: Sep 17, 2010
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Penalties for PRA Exemption Misconduct Introduction In the landmark case of Richard B. Sanders v. The State of Washington, decided on September 16, 2010,...
Void for Vagueness in Community Custody Conditions: STATE v. SANCHEZ VALENCIA

Void for Vagueness in Community Custody Conditions: STATE v. SANCHEZ VALENCIA

Date: Sep 10, 2010
Void for Vagueness in Community Custody Conditions: STATE v. SANCHEZ VALENCIA Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Isidro Sanchez Valencia et al., the Supreme Court of Washington...
Incarceration for Misdemeanor Probation Violations Does Not Interrupt Felony Washout Period: State v. James Ervin

Incarceration for Misdemeanor Probation Violations Does Not Interrupt Felony Washout Period: State v. James Ervin

Date: Sep 10, 2010
Incarceration for Misdemeanor Probation Violations Does Not Interrupt Felony Washout Period: State v. James Ervin Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. James L. Ervin, the...
Protecting Citizen Rights: Entitlement to Attorney Fees in Civil Forfeiture Cases under RCW 69.50.505(6)

Protecting Citizen Rights: Entitlement to Attorney Fees in Civil Forfeiture Cases under RCW 69.50.505(6)

Date: Sep 10, 2010
Protecting Citizen Rights: Entitlement to Attorney Fees in Civil Forfeiture Cases under RCW 69.50.505(6) Introduction The case of Jose Guillen et al. v. Lorena Contreras, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Defining "Separate Occasions" in Washington's Stalking Statute: Supreme Court Upholds Clear Interpretation in Kintz v. State

Defining "Separate Occasions" in Washington's Stalking Statute: Supreme Court Upholds Clear Interpretation in Kintz v. State

Date: Aug 27, 2010
Defining "Separate Occasions" in Washington's Stalking Statute: Supreme Court Upholds Clear Interpretation in Kintz v. State Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Clarence Andrew...
Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Enhanced Mens Rea Standards for True Threats in Harassment Cases

Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Enhanced Mens Rea Standards for True Threats in Harassment Cases

Date: Jul 30, 2010
Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Enhanced Mens Rea Standards for True Threats in Harassment Cases Introduction In the landmark case, The State of Washington v. Glen Arthur Schaler, the Supreme...
STATE v. BASHAW: Rigorous Standards for Admitting Distance Measurements and Clarifying Jury Unanimity in Special Verdicts

STATE v. BASHAW: Rigorous Standards for Admitting Distance Measurements and Clarifying Jury Unanimity in Special Verdicts

Date: Jul 2, 2010
STATE v. BASHAW: Rigorous Standards for Admitting Distance Measurements and Clarifying Jury Unanimity in Special Verdicts Introduction In State of Washington v. Bertha Iola Bashaw, 169 Wn. 2d 133...
Due Process Mandates Explicit Findings of Unfitness in Terminating Parental Rights

Due Process Mandates Explicit Findings of Unfitness in Terminating Parental Rights

Date: Jun 11, 2010
Due Process Mandates Explicit Findings of Unfitness in Terminating Parental Rights Introduction In the Matter of the Welfare of A.B. Rogelio Salas, Petitioner, v. The Department of Social and Health...
Inherent Prejudice of Jailhouse Courtrooms Violates Due Process: State of Washington v. Jaime

Inherent Prejudice of Jailhouse Courtrooms Violates Due Process: State of Washington v. Jaime

Date: May 28, 2010
Inherent Prejudice of Jailhouse Courtrooms Violates Due Process: State of Washington v. Jaime Introduction State of Washington v. James Frank Jaime is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Non-Alternative Means Crime in Sex Offender Registration: The State of Washington v. Michael Eugene Peterson

Non-Alternative Means Crime in Sex Offender Registration: The State of Washington v. Michael Eugene Peterson

Date: May 7, 2010
Non-Alternative Means Crime in Sex Offender Registration: The State of Washington v. Michael Eugene Peterson Introduction The State of Washington v. Michael Eugene Peterson, 168 Wn.2d 763 (2010), is...
HPRA Allows Division of Condominium Common Areas Without Unanimous Consent: Lake v. Woodcreek HOA

HPRA Allows Division of Condominium Common Areas Without Unanimous Consent: Lake v. Woodcreek HOA

Date: Apr 16, 2010
HPRA Allows Division of Condominium Common Areas Without Unanimous Consent: Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Association Introduction Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Association et al. is a landmark case...
STATE v. JONES: Upholding Sixth Amendment Rights by Allowing Defense Testimony on Contemporaneous Sexual Conduct in Rape Cases

STATE v. JONES: Upholding Sixth Amendment Rights by Allowing Defense Testimony on Contemporaneous Sexual Conduct in Rape Cases

Date: Apr 16, 2010
STATE v. JONES: Upholding Sixth Amendment Rights by Allowing Defense Testimony on Contemporaneous Sexual Conduct in Rape Cases Introduction State of Washington v. Christopher Lawrence Jones is a...
Admissibility of Immigration Status Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: SALAS v. HI-TECH ERECTORS

Admissibility of Immigration Status Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: SALAS v. HI-TECH ERECTORS

Date: Apr 16, 2010
Admissibility of Immigration Status Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: SALAS v. HI-TECH ERECTORS Introduction ALEX SALAS, Petitioner, v. HI-TECH ERECTORS, Respondent. (168 Wn. 2d 664) is a landmark...
Right to Self-Representation Under Washington Constitution Reinforced in State v. Madsen

Right to Self-Representation Under Washington Constitution Reinforced in State v. Madsen

Date: Mar 26, 2010
Right to Self-Representation Under Washington Constitution Reinforced in State v. Madsen Introduction State of Washington v. Kurt Randall Madsen is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Insurance Duty to Defend: Postassault Negligence Not Excluded by Assault and Battery Clauses

Insurance Duty to Defend: Postassault Negligence Not Excluded by Assault and Battery Clauses

Date: Mar 19, 2010
Insurance Duty to Defend: Postassault Negligence Not Excluded by Assault and Battery Clauses Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington addressed a pivotal issue in insurance law in the case of...
Lifetime No-Contact Orders and Constitutional Constraints: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Rainey

Lifetime No-Contact Orders and Constitutional Constraints: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Rainey

Date: Mar 12, 2010
Lifetime No-Contact Orders and Constitutional Constraints: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Rainey Introduction State v. Rainey is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of Washington that...
Washington Supreme Court Affirms Standards on Expert Testimony, Defense Evidence, and Double Jeopardy in Assault and Rape Case

Washington Supreme Court Affirms Standards on Expert Testimony, Defense Evidence, and Double Jeopardy in Assault and Rape Case

Date: Mar 5, 2010
Washington Supreme Court Affirms Standards on Expert Testimony, Defense Evidence, and Double Jeopardy in Assault and Rape Case Introduction In the case of The State of Washington v. Daniel Marshall...
Modifying Restitution Orders Beyond 180 Days: Insights from State v. Gonzalez

Modifying Restitution Orders Beyond 180 Days: Insights from State v. Gonzalez

Date: Feb 19, 2010
Modifying Restitution Orders Beyond 180 Days: Insights from State v. Gonzalez Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Robert Bustmante Gonzalez (168 Wn.2d 256) presents a pivotal...
Reissuing the Burden of Proof in Personal Restraint Petitions: Insights from In re Pers. Restraint of Grantham

Reissuing the Burden of Proof in Personal Restraint Petitions: Insights from In re Pers. Restraint of Grantham

Date: Feb 5, 2010
Reissuing the Burden of Proof in Personal Restraint Petitions: Insights from In re Pers. Restraint of Grantham Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the landmark decision of In re the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert