Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Inclusion of Corporate Identities in Washington's Identity Theft Statute: State v. Evans

Inclusion of Corporate Identities in Washington's Identity Theft Statute: State v. Evans

Date: Apr 12, 2013
Inclusion of Corporate Identities in Washington's Identity Theft Statute: State v. Evans Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Derrick Robert Evans (177 Wash. 2d 186, 2013) marks a...
Finality in Appellate Review: Insights from MacDonald Li v. ng Trust and Renaissance Homes

Finality in Appellate Review: Insights from MacDonald Li v. ng Trust and Renaissance Homes

Date: Mar 22, 2013
Finality in Appellate Review: Insights from MacDonald Li v. ng Trust and Renaissance Homes Introduction The case of MacDonald Li v. ng Trust and Renaissance Homes, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE v. YATES: Upholding Established Standards in Personal Restraint Petitions

Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE v. YATES: Upholding Established Standards in Personal Restraint Petitions

Date: Mar 15, 2013
Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE v. YATES: Upholding Established Standards in Personal Restraint Petitions Introduction The case of STATE v. YATES, 296 P.3d 872 (Wash. 2013), presents a...
Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Inverse Condemnation and Expert Testimony Admissibility

Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Inverse Condemnation and Expert Testimony Admissibility

Date: Mar 8, 2013
Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Inverse Condemnation and Expert Testimony Admissibility Introduction In Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc., the Supreme Court of Washington...
Klem v. Washington Mutual Bank: Defining Unfair and Deceptive Foreclosure Practices and Trustee’s Independent Duty Under Washington’s CPA

Klem v. Washington Mutual Bank: Defining Unfair and Deceptive Foreclosure Practices and Trustee’s Independent Duty Under Washington’s CPA

Date: Mar 1, 2013
Klem v. Washington Mutual Bank: Defining Unfair and Deceptive Foreclosure Practices and Trustee’s Independent Duty Under Washington’s CPA Introduction Dianne Klem, as Administrator of the Estate of...
Facial Validity and Timing in Personal Restraint Petitions: The Toledo–Sotelo Decision

Facial Validity and Timing in Personal Restraint Petitions: The Toledo–Sotelo Decision

Date: Feb 22, 2013
Facial Validity and Timing in Personal Restraint Petitions: The Toledo–Sotelo Decision Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Jose Toledo–Sotelo (176 Wash. 2d 759)...
Establishing the Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in First-Party Insurance Bad Faith Claims

Establishing the Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in First-Party Insurance Bad Faith Claims

Date: Feb 22, 2013
Establishing the Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in First-Party Insurance Bad Faith Claims Introduction Cedell v. Farmers Insurance Company of Washington is a landmark case adjudicated...
State v. Allen (2013): Upholding Judicial Discretion in Cross-Racial Eyewitness Identification Instructions

State v. Allen (2013): Upholding Judicial Discretion in Cross-Racial Eyewitness Identification Instructions

Date: Feb 9, 2013
State v. Allen (2013): Upholding Judicial Discretion in Cross-Racial Eyewitness Identification Instructions Introduction In State of Washington v. Bryan Edward Allen (294 P.3d 679, 2013), the Supreme...
Indivisible Plea Agreements and Sentencing Authority under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act: Analysis of STATE v. CHAMBERS

Indivisible Plea Agreements and Sentencing Authority under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act: Analysis of STATE v. CHAMBERS

Date: Feb 8, 2013
Indivisible Plea Agreements and Sentencing Authority under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act: Analysis of STATE v. CHAMBERS Introduction The case of State of Washington v. James John Chambers Jr....
Reaffirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Determining Same Criminal Conduct

Reaffirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Determining Same Criminal Conduct

Date: Feb 1, 2013
Reaffirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Determining Same Criminal Conduct Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in State of Washington v. Julio Cesar Aldana Graciano, addressed a...
Mixed-Motive Traffic Stops: Upholding Independence in Lawful Seizures

Mixed-Motive Traffic Stops: Upholding Independence in Lawful Seizures

Date: Dec 21, 2012
Mixed-Motive Traffic Stops: Upholding Independence in Lawful Seizures Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Gilberto Chacon Arreola (176 Wash. 2d 284, 2012) addresses a critical issue in...
STATE v. SUBLETT and Olsen: Affirming the Boundaries of the Public Trial Right in Washington State

STATE v. SUBLETT and Olsen: Affirming the Boundaries of the Public Trial Right in Washington State

Date: Nov 22, 2012
STATE v. SUBLETT and Olsen: Affirming the Boundaries of the Public Trial Right in Washington State Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Michael Lynn Sublett and Christopher Lee...
State v. Wise: Washington Supreme Court Emphasizes Strict Adherence to Bone–Club Framework for Public Trial Rights

State v. Wise: Washington Supreme Court Emphasizes Strict Adherence to Bone–Club Framework for Public Trial Rights

Date: Nov 22, 2012
State v. Wise: Washington Supreme Court Emphasizes Strict Adherence to Bone–Club Framework for Public Trial Rights Introduction In State of Washington v. Eric D. Wise, the Washington Supreme Court...
Due Process Violation in Sentencing: Washington Supreme Court Strikes Down RCW 9.94A.500(1) and .530(2)

Due Process Violation in Sentencing: Washington Supreme Court Strikes Down RCW 9.94A.500(1) and .530(2)

Date: Nov 2, 2012
Due Process Violation in Sentencing: Washington Supreme Court Strikes Down RCW 9.94A.500(1) and .530(2) Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Monte W. Hunley (175 Wash. 2d 901; 2012-11-01)...
Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Insights from State v. Glasmann

Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Insights from State v. Glasmann

Date: Oct 19, 2012
Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Insights from State v. Glasmann Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Edward Michael D. Glasmann, decided by the...
Cultural Competency Standards in Competency Evaluations: Insights from State v. Sisouvanh

Cultural Competency Standards in Competency Evaluations: Insights from State v. Sisouvanh

Date: Oct 19, 2012
Cultural Competency Standards in Competency Evaluations: Insights from State v. Sisouvanh Introduction State of Washington v. Phiengchai Sisouvanh is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Proportionality Review in Capital Sentencing: Insights from State v. Cecil Emile Davis

Proportionality Review in Capital Sentencing: Insights from State v. Cecil Emile Davis

Date: Sep 21, 2012
Proportionality Review in Capital Sentencing: Insights from State v. Cecil Emile Davis Introduction State of Washington v. Cecil Emile Davis is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Katare v. Katare: Admissibility of Risk Factor Evidence in Parenting Plans

Katare v. Katare: Admissibility of Risk Factor Evidence in Parenting Plans

Date: Aug 17, 2012
Katare v. Katare: Admissibility of Risk Factor Evidence in Parenting Plans Introduction Katare v. Katare, 175 Wash. 2d 23 (2012), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc, addresses...
Withdrawal of Juvenile Adjudication and Amendment of Criminal Charges: Insights from State v. Lamb

Withdrawal of Juvenile Adjudication and Amendment of Criminal Charges: Insights from State v. Lamb

Date: Aug 17, 2012
Withdrawal of Juvenile Adjudication and Amendment of Criminal Charges: Insights from State v. Lamb Introduction State of Washington v. Kenneth Eugene Lamb is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Washington Supreme Court Rules MERS is Not a Lawful Beneficiary Without Holding Promissory Notes

Washington Supreme Court Rules MERS is Not a Lawful Beneficiary Without Holding Promissory Notes

Date: Aug 17, 2012
Washington Supreme Court Rules MERS is Not a Lawful Beneficiary Without Holding Promissory Notes Introduction In the landmark case of Kristin Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc., the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert