Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Requirement of Demonstrating Actual and Substantial Prejudice in Personal Restraint Petitions for Guilty Plea Misstatements

Requirement of Demonstrating Actual and Substantial Prejudice in Personal Restraint Petitions for Guilty Plea Misstatements

Date: Jan 24, 2014
Requirement of Demonstrating Actual and Substantial Prejudice in Personal Restraint Petitions for Guilty Plea Misstatements Introduction In In re Personal Restraint Petition of Daniel J. Stockwell...
Defense Counsel's Continuance Requests and the Right to a Speedy Trial: STATE v. OLLIVIER

Defense Counsel's Continuance Requests and the Right to a Speedy Trial: STATE v. OLLIVIER

Date: Nov 1, 2013
Defense Counsel's Continuance Requests and the Right to a Speedy Trial: STATE v. OLLIVIER Introduction State of Washington v. Brandon Gene Ollivier is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Municipal Duty of Care in Serving Antiharassment Orders

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Municipal Duty of Care in Serving Antiharassment Orders

Date: Oct 18, 2013
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Municipal Duty of Care in Serving Antiharassment Orders Introduction The case of Carola Washburn and Janet Loh v. City of Federal Way addresses the tort liability...
Facilitating Testimony: The Role of Comfort Animals in Courtrooms

Facilitating Testimony: The Role of Comfort Animals in Courtrooms

Date: Sep 27, 2013
Facilitating Testimony: The Role of Comfort Animals in Courtrooms Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Timothy Dye, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed the nuanced issue of...
Clarifying the Imposition of Legal Financial Obligations: Insights from STATE v. LUNDY

Clarifying the Imposition of Legal Financial Obligations: Insights from STATE v. LUNDY

Date: Aug 14, 2013
Clarifying the Imposition of Legal Financial Obligations: Insights from STATE v. LUNDY Introduction State of Washington v. John Matthew Lundy, 176 Wash. App. 96 (2013), is a pivotal case from the...
Intent Required: Washington Supreme Court Sets Standard for Forgery Convictions in State v. Vasquez

Intent Required: Washington Supreme Court Sets Standard for Forgery Convictions in State v. Vasquez

Date: Jul 26, 2013
Intent Required: Washington Supreme Court Sets Standard for Forgery Convictions in State v. Vasquez Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Vianney Vasquez, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Prejudice Requirement in Collateral Sentencing Challenges: Analysis of State v. Finstad

Prejudice Requirement in Collateral Sentencing Challenges: Analysis of State v. Finstad

Date: May 24, 2013
Prejudice Requirement in Collateral Sentencing Challenges: Analysis of State v. Finstad Introduction State v. Finstad, 177 Wash. 2d 501 (2013), presents a pivotal examination of the standards...
Affirmative Defense Instruction Over Defendant’s Objection: Coristine v. State

Affirmative Defense Instruction Over Defendant’s Objection: Coristine v. State

Date: May 10, 2013
Affirmative Defense Instruction Over Defendant’s Objection: Coristine v. State Introduction Coristine v. State (177 Wash. 2d 370, 2013) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Inclusion of Corporate Identities in Washington's Identity Theft Statute: State v. Evans

Inclusion of Corporate Identities in Washington's Identity Theft Statute: State v. Evans

Date: Apr 12, 2013
Inclusion of Corporate Identities in Washington's Identity Theft Statute: State v. Evans Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Derrick Robert Evans (177 Wash. 2d 186, 2013) marks a...
Finality in Appellate Review: Insights from MacDonald Li v. ng Trust and Renaissance Homes

Finality in Appellate Review: Insights from MacDonald Li v. ng Trust and Renaissance Homes

Date: Mar 22, 2013
Finality in Appellate Review: Insights from MacDonald Li v. ng Trust and Renaissance Homes Introduction The case of MacDonald Li v. ng Trust and Renaissance Homes, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE v. YATES: Upholding Established Standards in Personal Restraint Petitions

Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE v. YATES: Upholding Established Standards in Personal Restraint Petitions

Date: Mar 15, 2013
Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE v. YATES: Upholding Established Standards in Personal Restraint Petitions Introduction The case of STATE v. YATES, 296 P.3d 872 (Wash. 2013), presents a...
Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Inverse Condemnation and Expert Testimony Admissibility

Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Inverse Condemnation and Expert Testimony Admissibility

Date: Mar 8, 2013
Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Inverse Condemnation and Expert Testimony Admissibility Introduction In Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc., the Supreme Court of Washington...
Klem v. Washington Mutual Bank: Defining Unfair and Deceptive Foreclosure Practices and Trustee’s Independent Duty Under Washington’s CPA

Klem v. Washington Mutual Bank: Defining Unfair and Deceptive Foreclosure Practices and Trustee’s Independent Duty Under Washington’s CPA

Date: Mar 1, 2013
Klem v. Washington Mutual Bank: Defining Unfair and Deceptive Foreclosure Practices and Trustee’s Independent Duty Under Washington’s CPA Introduction Dianne Klem, as Administrator of the Estate of...
Establishing the Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in First-Party Insurance Bad Faith Claims

Establishing the Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in First-Party Insurance Bad Faith Claims

Date: Feb 22, 2013
Establishing the Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in First-Party Insurance Bad Faith Claims Introduction Cedell v. Farmers Insurance Company of Washington is a landmark case adjudicated...
Facial Validity and Timing in Personal Restraint Petitions: The Toledo–Sotelo Decision

Facial Validity and Timing in Personal Restraint Petitions: The Toledo–Sotelo Decision

Date: Feb 22, 2013
Facial Validity and Timing in Personal Restraint Petitions: The Toledo–Sotelo Decision Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Jose Toledo–Sotelo (176 Wash. 2d 759)...
State v. Allen (2013): Upholding Judicial Discretion in Cross-Racial Eyewitness Identification Instructions

State v. Allen (2013): Upholding Judicial Discretion in Cross-Racial Eyewitness Identification Instructions

Date: Feb 9, 2013
State v. Allen (2013): Upholding Judicial Discretion in Cross-Racial Eyewitness Identification Instructions Introduction In State of Washington v. Bryan Edward Allen (294 P.3d 679, 2013), the Supreme...
Indivisible Plea Agreements and Sentencing Authority under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act: Analysis of STATE v. CHAMBERS

Indivisible Plea Agreements and Sentencing Authority under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act: Analysis of STATE v. CHAMBERS

Date: Feb 8, 2013
Indivisible Plea Agreements and Sentencing Authority under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act: Analysis of STATE v. CHAMBERS Introduction The case of State of Washington v. James John Chambers Jr....
Reaffirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Determining Same Criminal Conduct

Reaffirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Determining Same Criminal Conduct

Date: Feb 1, 2013
Reaffirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Determining Same Criminal Conduct Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in State of Washington v. Julio Cesar Aldana Graciano, addressed a...
Mixed-Motive Traffic Stops: Upholding Independence in Lawful Seizures

Mixed-Motive Traffic Stops: Upholding Independence in Lawful Seizures

Date: Dec 21, 2012
Mixed-Motive Traffic Stops: Upholding Independence in Lawful Seizures Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Gilberto Chacon Arreola (176 Wash. 2d 284, 2012) addresses a critical issue in...
STATE v. SUBLETT and Olsen: Affirming the Boundaries of the Public Trial Right in Washington State

STATE v. SUBLETT and Olsen: Affirming the Boundaries of the Public Trial Right in Washington State

Date: Nov 22, 2012
STATE v. SUBLETT and Olsen: Affirming the Boundaries of the Public Trial Right in Washington State Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Michael Lynn Sublett and Christopher Lee...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert