Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Virginia Case Commentaries

Supremacy of Contractual Compliance Over Estoppel in State Highway Construction Contracts

Supremacy of Contractual Compliance Over Estoppel in State Highway Construction Contracts

Date: Jun 15, 1965
Supremacy of Contractual Compliance Over Estoppel in State Highway Construction Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of Robert T. Main, Jr., and Kathryn M. Main, Partners Trading as Robert T....
Supreme Court of Virginia Reinforces Standards for Vacating Workmen’s Compensation Awards

Supreme Court of Virginia Reinforces Standards for Vacating Workmen’s Compensation Awards

Date: Mar 9, 1965
Supreme Court of Virginia Reinforces Standards for Vacating Workmen’s Compensation Awards Introduction In the landmark case City of Norfolk v. Earl Allen Bennett, decided on March 8, 1965, the...
Invalidation of 'Other Insurance' Clauses under Virginia's Uninsured Motorist Statute: Analysis of Bryant v. State Farm

Invalidation of 'Other Insurance' Clauses under Virginia's Uninsured Motorist Statute: Analysis of Bryant v. State Farm

Date: Mar 9, 1965
Invalidation of 'Other Insurance' Clauses under Virginia's Uninsured Motorist Statute: Analysis of Bryant v. State Farm Introduction The landmark case of Bernard H. Bryant, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual...
Webb v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Establishing Guidelines on Preliminary Hearings and Evidentiary Standards in Embezzlement Proceedings

Webb v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Establishing Guidelines on Preliminary Hearings and Evidentiary Standards in Embezzlement Proceedings

Date: Jan 15, 1963
Webb v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Establishing Guidelines on Preliminary Hearings and Evidentiary Standards in Embezzlement Proceedings Introduction The case of Catherine Webb v. Commonwealth of...
Defining the Boundaries of Employment in Workmen's Compensation: Conner v. Bragg

Defining the Boundaries of Employment in Workmen's Compensation: Conner v. Bragg

Date: Jan 16, 1962
Defining the Boundaries of Employment in Workmen's Compensation: Conner v. Bragg Introduction The case of Dewey M. Conner v. Thomas M. Bragg, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Virginia in 1962,...
Establishing Excessive Speed in Collision Cases: Supreme Court of Virginia Reverses Verdict

Establishing Excessive Speed in Collision Cases: Supreme Court of Virginia Reverses Verdict

Date: Sep 11, 1958
Establishing Excessive Speed in Collision Cases: Supreme Court of Virginia Reverses Verdict Introduction HAMILTON B. WOODSON JR. v. JULIA GERMAS is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Privilege in Media Reporting of Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Alexandria Gazette v. West

Privilege in Media Reporting of Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Alexandria Gazette v. West

Date: Jun 19, 1956
Privilege in Media Reporting of Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Alexandria Gazette Corporation v. Marion B. West Introduction The landmark case Alexandria Gazette Corporation v. Marion B. West,...
W. B. Wright v. Harris W. Everett and Patricia A. Everett: Limiting Exemplary Damages in Breach of Contract Cases

W. B. Wright v. Harris W. Everett and Patricia A. Everett: Limiting Exemplary Damages in Breach of Contract Cases

Date: Jan 17, 1956
W. B. Wright v. Harris W. Everett and Patricia A. Everett: Limiting Exemplary Damages in Breach of Contract Cases Introduction W. B. Wright v. Harris W. Everett and Patricia A. Everett, 197 Va. 608...
Marion Newell v. Dorkin Riggins, Jr.: Defining Gross Negligence in Non-Paying Passenger Accidents

Marion Newell v. Dorkin Riggins, Jr.: Defining Gross Negligence in Non-Paying Passenger Accidents

Date: Nov 29, 1955
Marion Newell v. Dorkin Riggins, Jr.: Defining Gross Negligence in Non-Paying Passenger Accidents Introduction The case of Marion Newell v. Dorkin Riggins, Jr. (197 Va. 490), adjudicated by the...
Defamation in Media: Carwile v. Richmond Newspapers Establishes Key Libel Precedents

Defamation in Media: Carwile v. Richmond Newspapers Establishes Key Libel Precedents

Date: Jun 22, 1954
Defamation in Media: Carwile v. Richmond Newspapers Establishes Key Libel Precedents Introduction The case of Howard H. Carwile v. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. (196 Va. 1) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Aubrey Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Affirmation of Grand Larceny Conviction Based on Accomplice Testimony

Aubrey Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Affirmation of Grand Larceny Conviction Based on Accomplice Testimony

Date: Jun 22, 1954
Affirmation of Grand Larceny Conviction Based on Accomplice Testimony Introduction The case of Aubrey G. Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia, decided by the Supreme Court of Virginia on June 21, 1954,...
Establishing Gross Negligence in Automobile Accidents: Analysis of Kennedy v. McElroy (195 Va. 1078)

Establishing Gross Negligence in Automobile Accidents: Analysis of Kennedy v. McElroy (195 Va. 1078)

Date: May 4, 1954
Establishing Gross Negligence in Automobile Accidents: Analysis of Kennedy v. McElroy (195 Va. 1078) Introduction Kennedy v. McElroy, 195 Va. 1078 (1954), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
State Sovereign Immunity Affirmed in Eriksen v. Anderson

State Sovereign Immunity Affirmed in Eriksen v. Anderson

Date: Jan 26, 1954
State Sovereign Immunity Affirmed in Eriksen v. Anderson Introduction Erik J. Eriksen and Louise Close Eriksen v. James A. Anderson, State Highway Commissioner is a landmark case decided by the...
Best Interests Standard and Admissibility of Child Testimony in Custody Cases: Hepler v. Hepler (195 Va. 611)

Best Interests Standard and Admissibility of Child Testimony in Custody Cases: Hepler v. Hepler (195 Va. 611)

Date: Jan 26, 1954
Best Interests Standard and Admissibility of Child Testimony in Custody Cases: Hepler v. Hepler (195 Va. 611) Introduction The case of Julian B. Hepler v. Margaret B. Hepler, decided by the Supreme...
Child Witness Competency and Double Jeopardy: Insights from ROBERT O. CROSS v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia

Child Witness Competency and Double Jeopardy: Insights from ROBERT O. CROSS v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia

Date: Sep 11, 1953
Child Witness Competency and Double Jeopardy: Insights from ROBERT O. CROSS v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia Introduction The case of Robert O. CROSS v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, decided by the Supreme...
Foreseeable Risks and Duty of Care in Electrical Operations: Northern Virginia Power Co. v. Susie V. Bailey

Foreseeable Risks and Duty of Care in Electrical Operations: Northern Virginia Power Co. v. Susie V. Bailey

Date: Dec 2, 1952
Foreseeable Risks and Duty of Care in Electrical Operations: Northern Virginia Power Co. v. Susie V. Bailey Introduction The case of Northern Virginia Power Company v. Susie V. Bailey, Administratrix...
Reaffirmation of Tenancy by the Entireties in Virginia: Ernest Vasilion v. George Vasilion and Others

Reaffirmation of Tenancy by the Entireties in Virginia: Ernest Vasilion v. George Vasilion and Others

Date: Sep 6, 1951
Reaffirmation of Tenancy by the Entireties in Virginia: Ernest Vasilion v. George Vasilion and Others Introduction Ernest Vasilion v. George Vasilion and Others is a pivotal 1951 decision by the...
Absolute Judicial Privilege in Libel and Slander: Insights from J. E. Darnell v. J. James Davis

Absolute Judicial Privilege in Libel and Slander: Insights from J. E. Darnell v. J. James Davis

Date: Mar 14, 1950
Absolute Judicial Privilege in Libel and Slander: Insights from J. E. Darnell v. J. James Davis. Introduction The case of J. E. Darnell v. J. J. James Davis (190 Va. 701), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Establishing Definitions and Indictment Standards under the Maiming Act: Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia (1949)

Establishing Definitions and Indictment Standards under the Maiming Act: Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia (1949)

Date: Apr 26, 1949
Establishing Definitions and Indictment Standards under the Maiming Act: Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia (1949) Introduction Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia is a landmark 1949 decision by the...
Discretionary Authority of Courts in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Insights from JOE PARRIS v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Discretionary Authority of Courts in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Insights from JOE PARRIS v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Apr 26, 1949
Discretionary Authority of Courts in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Insights from JOE PARRIS v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction The case of JOE PARRIS v. Commonwealth of Virginia, adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert