Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Virginia Case Commentaries

Limiting Sovereign Immunity for State-Employed Physicians: Insights from James v. Jane et al.

Limiting Sovereign Immunity for State-Employed Physicians: Insights from James v. Jane et al.

Date: Jun 7, 1980
Limiting Sovereign Immunity for State-Employed Physicians: Insights from James v. Jane et al. Introduction James v. Jane et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Virginia on June 6, 1980, represents a...
Manns v. Penn: Reaffirming Liability in Good Samaritan Motor Vehicle Operations

Manns v. Penn: Reaffirming Liability in Good Samaritan Motor Vehicle Operations

Date: Jun 7, 1980
Manns v. Penn: Reaffirming Liability in Good Samaritan Motor Vehicle Operations Introduction The Supreme Court of Virginia's decision in JOSEPHINE C. PENN, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC. v. EUGENE MANNS, 221...
Governmental Immunity in Traffic Regulation: City of Norfolk v. Freeman

Governmental Immunity in Traffic Regulation: City of Norfolk v. Freeman

Date: Jun 7, 1980
Governmental Immunity in Traffic Regulation: City of Norfolk v. Freeman Introduction The case of Eva M. Freeman, Administratrix of the Estate of James Clifton Hall, Deceased v. The City of Norfolk,...
Ensuring Impartial Juries: Analysis of BUDDY EARL JUSTUS v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Ensuring Impartial Juries: Analysis of BUDDY EARL JUSTUS v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Date: Apr 19, 1980
Ensuring Impartial Juries: Analysis of BUDDY EARL JUSTUS v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (220 Va. 971) Introduction BUDDY EARL JUSTUS v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Automobile Exception Under the Fourth Amendment: Fore v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Automobile Exception Under the Fourth Amendment: Fore v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Apr 19, 1980
Automobile Exception Under the Fourth Amendment: Fore v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction Fore v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 220 Va. 1007 (1980), is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Convictions Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Stamper v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Affirmation of Capital Murder Convictions Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Stamper v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Aug 31, 1979
Affirmation of Capital Murder Convictions Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Stamper v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction Stamper v. Commonwealth of Virginia (220 Va. 260; 43854 Record No. 790292)...
Supreme Court of Virginia Affirms Death Penalty Standards and Juror Eligibility in Clark v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Supreme Court of Virginia Affirms Death Penalty Standards and Juror Eligibility in Clark v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Aug 31, 1979
Supreme Court of Virginia Affirms Death Penalty Standards and Juror Eligibility in Clark v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction In the landmark case of James T. Clark, Jr. v. Commonwealth of...
Proportionality in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Coppola v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Proportionality in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Coppola v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Aug 31, 1979
Proportionality in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Coppola v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction Frank Coppola v. Commonwealth of Virginia (220 Va. 243, 1979) is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Reaffirmation of the Lex Loci Delicti Rule in Virginia Multistate Tort Actions: McMillan v. McMillan

Reaffirmation of the Lex Loci Delicti Rule in Virginia Multistate Tort Actions: McMillan v. McMillan

Date: Apr 21, 1979
Reaffirmation of the Lex Loci Delicti Rule in Virginia Multistate Tort Actions: McMillan v. McMillan Introduction McMillan v. McMillan, 219 Va. 1127 (1979), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Conspiracy Through Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from GERALD GENE FLOYD v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Establishing Conspiracy Through Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from GERALD GENE FLOYD v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Date: Nov 23, 1978
Establishing Conspiracy Through Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from GERALD GENE FLOYD v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Introduction The case of Gerald Gene Floyd v. Commonwealth of Virginia, decided by...
Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Self-Defense Claims: McGhee v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Self-Defense Claims: McGhee v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Nov 23, 1978
Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Self-Defense Claims: McGhee v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction The case of Opal Marie Hale McGhee v. Commonwealth of Virginia (219 Va. 560) adjudicated by the...
Virginia Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Death Penalty Impositions and Juror Exclusions in Smith v. Commonwealth

Virginia Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Death Penalty Impositions and Juror Exclusions in Smith v. Commonwealth

Date: Oct 7, 1978
Virginia Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Death Penalty Impositions and Juror Exclusions in Smith v. Commonwealth Introduction Michael Marnell Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia (219 Va....
Corroboration Sufficiency in Accomplice Testimony: Insights from Allard v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Corroboration Sufficiency in Accomplice Testimony: Insights from Allard v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Apr 22, 1978
Corroboration Sufficiency in Accomplice Testimony: Insights from Allard v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction James Virgil Allard v. Commonwealth of Virginia, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Double Jeopardy and Preliminary Hearings: Insights from Moore v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Double Jeopardy and Preliminary Hearings: Insights from Moore v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Sep 2, 1977
Double Jeopardy and Preliminary Hearings: Insights from Moore v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction Nancy Rebecca Moore v. Commonwealth of Virginia (218 Va. 388) is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Admissibility of Intoxicated Confessions and Self-Defense Standards: Insights from MARY LOU DAVENPORT SMITH v. C. THOMAS MUSTIAN

Admissibility of Intoxicated Confessions and Self-Defense Standards: Insights from MARY LOU DAVENPORT SMITH v. C. THOMAS MUSTIAN

Date: Apr 23, 1977
Admissibility of Intoxicated Confessions and Self-Defense Standards: Insights from Mary Lou Davenport Smith v. C. Thomas Mustian Introduction The case of Mary Lou Davenport Smith v. C. Thomas...
Earl David Inge v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Affirmation of Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence

Earl David Inge v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Affirmation of Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence

Date: Oct 9, 1976
Earl David Inge v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Affirmation of Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Introduction Earl David Inge v. Commonwealth of Virginia is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Establishing Tort Liability for Proprietary Functions of Municipal Housing Authorities in Virginia

Establishing Tort Liability for Proprietary Functions of Municipal Housing Authorities in Virginia

Date: Jun 12, 1976
Establishing Tort Liability for Proprietary Functions of Municipal Housing Authorities in Virginia Introduction The case of Virginia Electric and Power Company v. Hampton Redevelopment and Housing...
Establishing Corroboration Standards for Accomplice Testimony: Insights from Dillard v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Establishing Corroboration Standards for Accomplice Testimony: Insights from Dillard v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Date: Apr 24, 1976
Establishing Corroboration Standards for Accomplice Testimony: Insights from Dillard v. Commonwealth of Virginia Introduction Dillard v. Commonwealth of Virginia is a pivotal case decided by the...
Sustaining Conviction on Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from EPOCH TACOMA HIGGINBOTHAM v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Sustaining Conviction on Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from EPOCH TACOMA HIGGINBOTHAM v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Date: Oct 11, 1975
Sustaining Conviction on Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from EPOCH TACOMA HIGGINBOTHAM v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Introduction The case of Epoch Tacoma Higginbotham v. Commonwealth of Virginia...
Affirmation of Voluntary Confession Standards and Harmless Error in Ineffective Counsel Claims

Affirmation of Voluntary Confession Standards and Harmless Error in Ineffective Counsel Claims

Date: Apr 29, 1975
Affirmation of Voluntary Confession Standards and Harmless Error in Ineffective Counsel Claims Introduction James Henry Davis, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert