Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Vermont Case Commentaries

Application of Collateral Estoppel to Qualified Immunity in Unreasonable Search Claims

Application of Collateral Estoppel to Qualified Immunity in Unreasonable Search Claims

Date: Sep 3, 2003
Application of Collateral Estoppel to Qualified Immunity in Unreasonable Search Claims Introduction Peggy Stevens and Doreen Jarvis v. Theodore R. Stearns, et al. is a significant appellate decision...
Limitation of Administrative Authority in Issuing Jurisdictional Opinions under Act 250

Limitation of Administrative Authority in Issuing Jurisdictional Opinions under Act 250

Date: Sep 7, 2002
Limitation of Administrative Authority in Issuing Jurisdictional Opinions under Act 250 Introduction In the case of In Re Vermont Verde Antique International, Inc. (No. 01-116, May Term, 2002), the...
Siliski v. Allstate Insurance Co.: Establishing Precedents in Malicious Prosecution and Emotional Distress Claims

Siliski v. Allstate Insurance Co.: Establishing Precedents in Malicious Prosecution and Emotional Distress Claims

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Siliski v. Allstate Insurance Co.: Establishing Precedents in Malicious Prosecution and Emotional Distress Claims Introduction The case of Joseph J. and Doreen H. Siliski v. Allstate Insurance...
Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Just Cause Termination and Dismisses Emotional Distress and Defamation Claims in Employment Dispute

Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Just Cause Termination and Dismisses Emotional Distress and Defamation Claims in Employment Dispute

Date: Jun 29, 2002
Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Just Cause Termination and Dismisses Emotional Distress and Defamation Claims in Employment Dispute Introduction The case of Sharon and Robert Dulude v. Fletcher Allen...
Termination of Parental Rights in Juvenile Cases: Insights from In re S.B., Juvenile

Termination of Parental Rights in Juvenile Cases: Insights from In re S.B., Juvenile

Date: May 3, 2002
Termination of Parental Rights in Juvenile Cases: Insights from In re S.B., Juvenile Introduction In re S.B., Juvenile, 174 Vt. 427 (2002), is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Vermont Supreme Court Establishes Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Economic Loss in Survey Negligence Cases

Vermont Supreme Court Establishes Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Economic Loss in Survey Negligence Cases

Date: Apr 22, 2000
Vermont Supreme Court Establishes Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Economic Loss in Survey Negligence Cases Introduction The case of John W. and Melinda H. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Associates,...
Vermont Supreme Court Establishes Equal Marriage Rights for Same-Sex Couples

Vermont Supreme Court Establishes Equal Marriage Rights for Same-Sex Couples

Date: Dec 21, 1999
Vermont Supreme Court Establishes Equal Marriage Rights for Same-Sex Couples Introduction In the landmark case of Stan Baker, et al. v. State of Vermont, et al. (170 Vt. 194), the Supreme Court of...
Retention of Existing Small Lot Zoning Exemptions Post Common Ownership: Shoreham v. Weeks

Retention of Existing Small Lot Zoning Exemptions Post Common Ownership: Shoreham v. Weeks

Date: May 2, 1998
Retention of Existing Small Lot Zoning Exemptions Post Common Ownership: Shoreham v. Weeks Introduction Shoreham v. Weeks is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Vermont, rendered on May 1,...
Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies Authority on Joint Legal Parental Rights in Divorce Cases

Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies Authority on Joint Legal Parental Rights in Divorce Cases

Date: May 24, 1997
Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies Authority on Joint Legal Parental Rights in Divorce Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Ellen Adams Cabot v. Thomas D. Cabot, III, decided on May 23, 1997, the...
Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Sexual Assault Cases: State v. Loveland

Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Sexual Assault Cases: State v. Loveland

Date: Aug 10, 1996
Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Sexual Assault Cases: State of Vermont v. Michael Loveland (165 Vt. 418) Introduction State of Vermont v. Michael Loveland is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Rejection of Sole Reliance on Psychological Testing in Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from IN RE B.M., Juvenile

Rejection of Sole Reliance on Psychological Testing in Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from IN RE B.M., Juvenile

Date: Jul 6, 1996
Rejection of Sole Reliance on Psychological Testing in Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from IN RE B.M., Juvenile Introduction IN RE B.M., Juvenile is a landmark 1996 decision by the Supreme...
STATE v. MADISON: Affirming Strict Bail Denial under 13 V.S.A. §7553a in Sexual Assault Cases

STATE v. MADISON: Affirming Strict Bail Denial under 13 V.S.A. §7553a in Sexual Assault Cases

Date: Mar 23, 1995
STATE v. MADISON: Affirming Strict Bail Denial under 13 V.S.A. §7553a in Sexual Assault Cases Introduction State of Vermont v. Jason Madison is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Denton v. Chittenden Bank: Clarifying the Threshold for 'Extreme and Outrageous' Conduct in Employment Tort Claims

Denton v. Chittenden Bank: Clarifying the Threshold for 'Extreme and Outrageous' Conduct in Employment Tort Claims

Date: Dec 10, 1994
Denton v. Chittenden Bank: Clarifying the Threshold for 'Extreme and Outrageous' Conduct in Employment Tort Claims Introduction The case of Bernard A. Denton, Sandra Denton, and Their Minor Children...
Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Parental Rights Termination in Sex Abuse Cases: MULLIN v. PHELPS

Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Parental Rights Termination in Sex Abuse Cases: MULLIN v. PHELPS

Date: Jun 25, 1994
Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Parental Rights Termination in Sex Abuse Cases: MULLIN v. PHELPS Introduction Stephen Mullin v. Rita (Mullin) Phelps, 162 Vt. 250 (1994), is a...
Baldwin v. Upper Valley Services: Establishing Grounds for Implied Employment Contracts

Baldwin v. Upper Valley Services: Establishing Grounds for Implied Employment Contracts

Date: May 7, 1994
Baldwin v. Upper Valley Services: Establishing Grounds for Implied Employment Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of Mark Baldwin v. Upper Valley Services, Inc. (162 Vt. 51, 1994), the...
Establishing Criteria for Termination of Parental Rights in Vermont: An Analysis of In re A.F., B.F., and C.F., Juveniles

Establishing Criteria for Termination of Parental Rights in Vermont: An Analysis of In re A.F., B.F., and C.F., Juveniles

Date: Mar 20, 1993
Establishing Criteria for Termination of Parental Rights in Vermont: An Analysis of In re A.F., B.F., and C.F., Juveniles Introduction The Supreme Court of Vermont, in its 1993 decision In re A.F.,...
Reassessing Lot Separation in Zoning Law: Allen Wilcox v. Village of Manchester

Reassessing Lot Separation in Zoning Law: Allen Wilcox v. Village of Manchester

Date: Sep 5, 1992
Reassessing Lot Separation in Zoning Law: Allen Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Introduction Allen Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Zoning Board of Adjustment (159 Vt. 193) is a pivotal case decided...
Clarifying 'Control' in Land Use Regulation: Insights from In re Lou R. Vitale

Clarifying 'Control' in Land Use Regulation: Insights from In re Lou R. Vitale

Date: Apr 22, 1989
Clarifying 'Control' in Land Use Regulation: Insights from In re Lou R. Vitale Introduction In re Lou R. Vitale (151 Vt. 580) is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court of Vermont that delves into...
Clarifying the Interpretation of Restrictive Clauses in Deeds: Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corporation

Clarifying the Interpretation of Restrictive Clauses in Deeds: Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corporation

Date: Dec 10, 1988
Clarifying the Interpretation of Restrictive Clauses in Deeds: Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corporation Introduction Patricia C. Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corporation, 150 Vt. 575 (1988), is a...
Establishing Equal Guardianship and Custody Rights for Grandparents and Biological Fathers: Insights from In re S.B.L.

Establishing Equal Guardianship and Custody Rights for Grandparents and Biological Fathers: Insights from In re S.B.L.

Date: Aug 27, 1988
Establishing Equal Guardianship and Custody Rights for Grandparents and Biological Fathers: Insights from In re S.B.L. Introduction The case of In re S.B.L. addresses significant issues in child...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert