Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Utah Case Commentaries

Enhancing Particularity in Fraud Claims Against Corporate Officers: Insights from AFIE v. Judi Harrison

Enhancing Particularity in Fraud Claims Against Corporate Officers: Insights from AFIE v. Judi Harrison

Date: Apr 26, 2003
Enhancing Particularity in Fraud Claims Against Corporate Officers: Insights from AFIE v. Judi Harrison Introduction The case of Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. Judi Harrison (70 P.3d 35)...
Determining Party Intent in Secured Transactions: Ambiguity Requires Fact-Finding

Determining Party Intent in Secured Transactions: Ambiguity Requires Fact-Finding

Date: Aug 17, 2002
Determining Party Intent in Secured Transactions: Ambiguity Requires Fact-Finding Introduction The case of WebBank, a Utah industrial loan corporation, Susan Soliz, Justin Magner, Econuel Ingram, and...
Denial of PIP Benefits Based on Medical Necessity Does Not Breach Good Faith Under Utah Law

Denial of PIP Benefits Based on Medical Necessity Does Not Breach Good Faith Under Utah Law

Date: Jul 24, 2002
Denial of PIP Benefits Based on Medical Necessity Does Not Breach Good Faith Under Utah Law Introduction In the case of Garrett Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. (56 P.3d 524), the Supreme...
Reaffirming 'Affirm on Any Ground' in Protective Order Cases: Insights from BAILEY v. BAYLES

Reaffirming 'Affirm on Any Ground' in Protective Order Cases: Insights from BAILEY v. BAYLES

Date: Jun 26, 2002
Reaffirming 'Affirm on Any Ground' in Protective Order Cases: Insights from BAILEY v. BAYLES Introduction In the landmark case of Jeroldene Bailey v. Randee Bayles, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Independent Duties of Real Estate Professionals and Exceptions to Spousal Privilege in Utah

Establishing Independent Duties of Real Estate Professionals and Exceptions to Spousal Privilege in Utah

Date: May 18, 2002
Establishing Independent Duties of Real Estate Professionals and Exceptions to Spousal Privilege in Utah Introduction In the landmark case of C. Dean and Carol N. Hermansen, et al. v. George N....
State of Utah v. Kell: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Validation of Death Penalty Procedural Standards

State of Utah v. Kell: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Validation of Death Penalty Procedural Standards

Date: Feb 9, 2002
State of Utah v. Kell: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Validation of Death Penalty Procedural Standards Introduction In State of Utah v. Troy Michael Kell, the Supreme Court of Utah...
Oral Modifications Validated and Attorney Fees to Prevailing Party in RTNC v. Cook

Oral Modifications Validated and Attorney Fees to Prevailing Party in RTNC v. Cook

Date: Jan 26, 2002
Oral Modifications Validated and Attorney Fees Awarded to Prevailing Party in RTNC v. Cook Introduction The case of R.T. Nielson Company (RTNC) versus Merrill Cook and the Merrill Cook for Congress...
Reaffirming Arbitration Clauses: Central Florida Investments v. Parkwest Associates

Reaffirming Arbitration Clauses: Central Florida Investments v. Parkwest Associates

Date: Jan 12, 2002
Reaffirming Arbitration Clauses: Central Florida Investments v. Parkwest Associates Introduction Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest Associates and Beaver Creek Associates is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Non-Unanimous Jury Sentencing in Utah Criminal Cases

Affirmation of Non-Unanimous Jury Sentencing in Utah Criminal Cases

Date: Jan 12, 2002
Affirmation of Non-Unanimous Jury Sentencing in Utah Criminal Cases Introduction State of Utah v. Eric Thomas Daniels is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Utah on January 11, 2002. The...
Final Judgment Rule Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Attorney Fee Dispute: Loffredo v. Holt

Final Judgment Rule Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Attorney Fee Dispute: Loffredo v. Holt

Date: Nov 10, 2001
Final Judgment Rule Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Attorney Fee Dispute: Loffredo v. Holt Introduction Bonnie Loffredo and Donald A. Westenskow (Plaintiffs and Appellees) brought a legal dispute...
Reinforcing Anti-Assignment Clauses and Upholding the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Contracts: Analysis of SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson Ventulett et al.

Reinforcing Anti-Assignment Clauses and Upholding the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Contracts: Analysis of SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson Ventulett et al.

Date: Jun 27, 2001
Reinforcing Anti-Assignment Clauses and Upholding the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Contracts: Analysis of SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson Ventulett et al. Introduction The case of SME...
Utah Court of Appeals Clarifies Standards for Juvenile Court Permanency and Termination Proceedings

Utah Court of Appeals Clarifies Standards for Juvenile Court Permanency and Termination Proceedings

Date: Mar 9, 2001
Utah Court of Appeals Clarifies Standards for Juvenile Court Permanency and Termination Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case STATE of Utah, in the interest of E.R., J.R., J.R., and C.R.,...
Reversing Involuntary Dismissal: Correct Burden of Proof in Liquidated Damages - Bair v. Axiom Design

Reversing Involuntary Dismissal: Correct Burden of Proof in Liquidated Damages - Bair v. Axiom Design

Date: Mar 3, 2001
Reversing Involuntary Dismissal: Correct Burden of Proof in Liquidated Damages Bair v. Axiom Design, L.L.C., 20 P.3d 388 (Utah 2001) Introduction The case of Royce L. Bair, dba The Stock Solution v....
Res Judicata and Issue Preclusion in Successor Liability: Insights from Macris Associates v. Neways Inc.

Res Judicata and Issue Preclusion in Successor Liability: Insights from Macris Associates v. Neways Inc.

Date: Dec 6, 2000
Res Judicata and Issue Preclusion in Successor Liability: Insights from Macris Associates v. Neways Inc. Introduction The case of Macris Associates, Inc. v. Neways Inc., Thomas E. Mower, and Leslie...
Strict Standards for Excusable Neglect Affirmed in Appellate Extensions

Strict Standards for Excusable Neglect Affirmed in Appellate Extensions

Date: Nov 3, 2000
Strict Standards for Excusable Neglect Affirmed in Appellate Extensions Introduction Case Title: Cristobal Serrato and Elida Serrato, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Utah Transit Authority and Lance K....
Utah Supreme Court Affirms Self-Executing Constitutional Clauses and Establishes Framework for Damages in Spackman v. Board of Education

Utah Supreme Court Affirms Self-Executing Constitutional Clauses and Establishes Framework for Damages in Spackman v. Board of Education

Date: Nov 1, 2000
Utah Supreme Court Affirms Self-Executing Constitutional Clauses and Establishes Framework for Damages in Spackman v. Board of Education Introduction In the landmark case of Jennifer Spackman v....
Enhancing Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Jury Selection: Analysis of State v. Litherland, 2000 UT 76

Enhancing Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Jury Selection: Analysis of State v. Litherland, 2000 UT 76

Date: Sep 30, 2000
Enhancing Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Jury Selection: Analysis of State v. Litherland, 2000 UT 76 Introduction State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Christopher Litherland,...
Strict Adherence to Preservation Rules in Sufficiency of Evidence Claims: STATE v. HOLGATE

Strict Adherence to Preservation Rules in Sufficiency of Evidence Claims: STATE v. HOLGATE

Date: Sep 20, 2000
Strict Adherence to Preservation Rules in Sufficiency of Evidence Claims: STATE v. HOLGATE Introduction STATE of Utah v. Sean Hale HOLGATE, 10 P.3d 346 (Utah 2000), is a pivotal case in Utah...
Dismissal of Appeal Due to Non-Final Judgment: Bradbury v. Valencia

Dismissal of Appeal Due to Non-Final Judgment: Bradbury v. Valencia

Date: Jun 10, 2000
Dismissal of Appeal Due to Non-Final Judgment: Bradbury v. Valencia Introduction The case of Randy P. Bradbury and Dawn Bradbury v. Phil Valencia and Opal Valencia, decided by the Supreme Court of...
State of Utah v. Allan Kelley: Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Effective Counsel Standards

State of Utah v. Allan Kelley: Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Effective Counsel Standards

Date: May 3, 2000
State of Utah v. Allan Kelley: Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Effective Counsel Standards Introduction State of Utah v. Allan Kelley is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Utah...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert