Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Panetti v. Quarterman: Enhancing Eighth Amendment Protections Against Execution of the Insane

Panetti v. Quarterman: Enhancing Eighth Amendment Protections Against Execution of the Insane

Date: Jun 29, 2007
Panetti v. Quarterman: Enhancing Eighth Amendment Protections Against Execution of the Insane Introduction Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses...
Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission: Redefining Electioneering Communications

Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission: Redefining Electioneering Communications

Date: Jun 26, 2007
Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission: Redefining Electioneering Communications Introduction The Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. case, decided by the...
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life: Redefining Corporate Electioneering Communications

Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life: Redefining Corporate Electioneering Communications

Date: Jun 26, 2007
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life: Redefining Corporate Electioneering Communications Introduction Federal Election Commission (FEC) v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., Senator...
Promoting Illegal Drug Use: Establishing School Authority Over Student Expression

Promoting Illegal Drug Use: Establishing School Authority Over Student Expression

Date: Jun 26, 2007
Promoting Illegal Drug Use: Establishing School Authority Over Student Expression Introduction Deborah Morse, et al., Petitioners v. Joseph Frederick is a landmark decision by the United States...
Limits on Bivens Actions for Fifth Amendment Retaliation: Wilkie v. Robbins

Limits on Bivens Actions for Fifth Amendment Retaliation: Wilkie v. Robbins

Date: Jun 26, 2007
Limits on Bivens Actions for Fifth Amendment Retaliation: Wilkie v. Robbins Introduction In Charles Wilkie, et al. v. Harvey Frank Robbins, 551 U.S. 537 (2007), the United States Supreme Court...
Limiting Taxpayer Standing in Executive Actions: Insights from HEIN v. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION

Limiting Taxpayer Standing in Executive Actions: Insights from HEIN v. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION

Date: Jun 26, 2007
Limiting Taxpayer Standing in Executive Actions: Insights from HEIN v. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION Introduction In the landmark case HEIN, DIRECTOR, WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF FAITH-BASED AND...
Supreme Court Establishes ESA §7(a)(2) Applies Only to Discretionary Federal Actions

Supreme Court Establishes ESA §7(a)(2) Applies Only to Discretionary Federal Actions

Date: Jun 26, 2007
Supreme Court Establishes ESA §7(a)(2) Applies Only to Discretionary Federal Actions Introduction The United States Supreme Court delivered a landmark decision in National Association of Home...
TSSAA v. Brentwood Academy: Upholding Athletic Authority and Speech Regulation in School Sports

TSSAA v. Brentwood Academy: Upholding Athletic Authority and Speech Regulation in School Sports

Date: Jun 22, 2007
TSSAA v. Brentwood Academy: Upholding Athletic Authority and Speech Regulation in School Sports Introduction Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (TSSAA) v. Brentwood Academy is a landmark...
Tellabs v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.: Defining 'Strong Inference' of Scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Tellabs v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.: Defining 'Strong Inference' of Scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Date: Jun 22, 2007
Tellabs v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.: Defining 'Strong Inference' of Scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Introduction In Tellabs, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Makor Issues &...
Rita v. United States: Appellate Presumption of Reasonableness for Guidelines Sentences

Rita v. United States: Appellate Presumption of Reasonableness for Guidelines Sentences

Date: Jun 22, 2007
Rita v. United States: Appellate Presumption of Reasonableness for Guidelines Sentences 1. Introduction Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that...
Implied Preclusion of Antitrust Laws by Securities Law: Analysis of Credit Suisse Securities v. Billing

Implied Preclusion of Antitrust Laws by Securities Law: Analysis of Credit Suisse Securities v. Billing

Date: Jun 19, 2007
Implied Preclusion of Antitrust Laws by Securities Law: Analysis of Credit Suisse Securities v. Billing Introduction The Supreme Court case Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, FKA Credit Suisse First...
Brendlin v. California: Establishing Passenger Seizure Under the Fourth Amendment

Brendlin v. California: Establishing Passenger Seizure Under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Jun 19, 2007
Brendlin v. California: Establishing Passenger Seizure Under the Fourth Amendment Introduction In the landmark case of Brendlin v. California, decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 18,...
Implied Preclusion of Antitrust Laws by Federal Securities Law in IPO Syndicate Practices

Implied Preclusion of Antitrust Laws by Federal Securities Law in IPO Syndicate Practices

Date: Jun 19, 2007
Implied Preclusion of Antitrust Laws by Federal Securities Law in IPO Syndicate Practices Introduction Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Glen Billing et al., 551 U.S. 264 (2007), is a landmark...
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Appellate Limitations on Remand Orders under FSIA

Supreme Court Establishes Strict Appellate Limitations on Remand Orders under FSIA

Date: Jun 19, 2007
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Appellate Limitations on Remand Orders under FSIA Introduction In the landmark case Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc., et al. (551 U.S. 224, 2007), the...
Affirmative Authorization for Election-Related Union Expenditures in Public Sector Upheld

Affirmative Authorization for Election-Related Union Expenditures in Public Sector Upheld

Date: Jun 15, 2007
Affirmative Authorization for Election-Related Union Expenditures in Public Sector Upheld Introduction In Davenport v. Washington Education Association, 551 U.S. 177 (2007), the United States Supreme...
Jurisdictional Nature of Notice of Appeal Timeliness Reinforced in BOWLES v. RUSSELL

Jurisdictional Nature of Notice of Appeal Timeliness Reinforced in BOWLES v. RUSSELL

Date: Jun 15, 2007
Jurisdictional Nature of Notice of Appeal Timeliness Reinforced in BOWLES v. RUSSELL Introduction In the landmark case of Keith Bowles v. Harry Russell, Warden, 551 U.S. 205 (2007), the United States...
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: Tax Lien Exceptions Clarified in Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: Tax Lien Exceptions Clarified in Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York

Date: Jun 15, 2007
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: Tax Lien Exceptions Clarified in Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, The Permanent Mission of India to the...
FSIA Exception Expanded to Tax Liens on Foreign State-Owned Property

FSIA Exception Expanded to Tax Liens on Foreign State-Owned Property

Date: Jun 15, 2007
FSIA Exception Expanded to Tax Liens on Foreign State-Owned Property Introduction The case of Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations et al. v. City of New York, New York, 551 U.S. 193...
Philip Morris v. Watson: Defining 'Acting Under' in Federal Officer Removal

Philip Morris v. Watson: Defining 'Acting Under' in Federal Officer Removal

Date: Jun 12, 2007
Philip Morris v. Watson: Defining 'Acting Under' in Federal Officer Removal Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Philip Morris Companies, Inc., et al. v. Lisa Watson, et al. (551 U.S....
Fry v. Pliler (2007): Establishing Brecht's 'Substantial and Injurious Effect' as the Standard for Prejudicial Impact in Federal Habeas Review

Fry v. Pliler (2007): Establishing Brecht's 'Substantial and Injurious Effect' as the Standard for Prejudicial Impact in Federal Habeas Review

Date: Jun 12, 2007
Fry v. Pliler (2007): Establishing Brecht's 'Substantial and Injurious Effect' as the Standard for Prejudicial Impact in Federal Habeas Review Introduction In John Francis Fry v. Cheryl K. Pliler,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert