Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Mandatory Life Without Parole for Juvenile Offenders Violates the Eighth Amendment

Mandatory Life Without Parole for Juvenile Offenders Violates the Eighth Amendment

Date: Jun 26, 2012
Mandatory Life Without Parole for Juvenile Offenders Violates the Eighth Amendment Introduction In the landmark 2012 decision of E v. W. Miller and Kuntrell Jackson v. Alabama, the United States...
Supreme Court Decision on Arizona’s S.B. 1070: Preemption of State Immigration Enforcement Laws

Supreme Court Decision on Arizona’s S.B. 1070: Preemption of State Immigration Enforcement Laws

Date: Jun 26, 2012
Supreme Court Decision on Arizona’s S.B. 1070: Preemption of State Immigration Enforcement Laws Introduction In the landmark case of Arizona v. United States, the United States Supreme Court...
FCC's Indecency Enforcement Policy Found Vague under Due Process: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

FCC's Indecency Enforcement Policy Found Vague under Due Process: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Date: Jun 22, 2012
FCC's Indecency Enforcement Policy Found Vague under Due Process: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) v. Fox Television...
Retroactive Application of the Fair Sentencing Act's Mandatory Minimums to Pre-Enactment Offenders

Retroactive Application of the Fair Sentencing Act's Mandatory Minimums to Pre-Enactment Offenders

Date: Jun 22, 2012
Retroactive Application of the Fair Sentencing Act's Mandatory Minimums to Pre-Enactment Offenders Introduction The United States Supreme Court case of Edward Dorsey, Sr., Petitioner v. United States...
Apprendi Applies to Criminal Fines: Southern Union Co. v. United States

Apprendi Applies to Criminal Fines: Southern Union Co. v. United States

Date: Jun 22, 2012
Apprendi Applies to Criminal Fines: Southern Union Co. v. United States Introduction Southern Union Company v. United States, 567 U.S. 343 (2012), marks a significant development in the...
FCC v. Fox Television Stations: Defining Fair Notice in Broadcast Indecency Regulations

FCC v. Fox Television Stations: Defining Fair Notice in Broadcast Indecency Regulations

Date: Jun 22, 2012
FCC v. Fox Television Stations: Defining Fair Notice in Broadcast Indecency Regulations Introduction Federal Communications Commission (FCC) v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. is a pivotal United...
Application of the Fair Sentencing Act's Mandatory Minimums to Pre-Act Offenders

Application of the Fair Sentencing Act's Mandatory Minimums to Pre-Act Offenders

Date: Jun 22, 2012
Application of the Fair Sentencing Act's Mandatory Minimums to Pre-Act Offenders Comprehensive Commentary on Edward Dorsey, Sr. v. United States & Corey A. Hill, Petitioner v. United States, 567 U.S....
Clarity in FCC Indecency Regulations: Ensuring Due Process and Fair Notice

Clarity in FCC Indecency Regulations: Ensuring Due Process and Fair Notice

Date: Jun 22, 2012
Clarity in FCC Indecency Regulations: Ensuring Due Process and Fair Notice Introduction In the landmark case Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 567 U.S. 239 (2012),...
KNOX v. SEIU: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections in Union Fee Collections

KNOX v. SEIU: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections in Union Fee Collections

Date: Jun 22, 2012
KNOX v. SEIU: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections in Union Fee Collections Introduction In KNOX, et al. v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1000, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed...
Full Payment of Contract Support Costs Under ISDA Affirmed in Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter

Full Payment of Contract Support Costs Under ISDA Affirmed in Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Full Payment of Contract Support Costs Under ISDA Affirmed in Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter Introduction Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter, 132 S.Ct. 2181 (2012), represents a pivotal decision by the...
Ensuring Actual Notice in Defendants' Right to Be Present: Analysis of FAIRY v. TUCKER

Ensuring Actual Notice in Defendants' Right to Be Present: Analysis of FAIRY v. TUCKER

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Ensuring Actual Notice in Defendants' Right to Be Present: Analysis of FAIRY v. TUCKER Introduction The case of William Smoak FAIREY, Jr., aka Doak Fairey v. Kenneth S. TUCKER, Secretary, Florida...
Classification of Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives under the FLSA: Insights from CHRISTOPHER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

Classification of Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives under the FLSA: Insights from CHRISTOPHER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Classification of Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives under the FLSA: Insights from CHRISTOPHER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM Introduction In the landmark case of CHRISTOPHER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM...
Sovereign Immunity and Quiet Title Actions: Insights from Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak

Sovereign Immunity and Quiet Title Actions: Insights from Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Sovereign Immunity and Quiet Title Actions: Insights from Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak Introduction The Supreme Court case Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak...
Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Upholding Expert Testimony Practices under the Confrontation Clause

Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Upholding Expert Testimony Practices under the Confrontation Clause

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Upholding Expert Testimony Practices under the Confrontation Clause Introduction Sandy Williams v. Illinois, 567 U.S. 50 (2012), is a significant case in the realm of...
Full Payment Obligation Under ISDA: Implications of Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter

Full Payment Obligation Under ISDA: Implications of Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Full Payment Obligation Under ISDA: Implications of Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter Introduction The United States Supreme Court case, Ken L. Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Ramah...
Sovereign Immunity and Agency Review: Key Takeaways from Match–E–Be–Nash–She–Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Da

Sovereign Immunity and Agency Review: Key Takeaways from Match–E–Be–Nash–She–Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Da

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Sovereign Immunity and Agency Review: Key Takeaways from Match–E–Be–Nash–She–Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Da Introduction In Match–E–Be–Nash–She–Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Da, 567...
Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Supreme Court Upholds Expert DNA Testimony under the Confrontation Clause

Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Supreme Court Upholds Expert DNA Testimony under the Confrontation Clause

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Supreme Court Upholds Expert DNA Testimony under the Confrontation Clause Introduction Sandy Williams v. Illinois (132 S.Ct. 2221, 2012) is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Pharmaceutical Detailers Classified as Outside Salesmen under FLSA: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Pharmaceutical Detailers Classified as Outside Salesmen under FLSA: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Pharmaceutical Detailers Classified as Outside Salesmen under FLSA: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case CHRISTOPHER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPoration dba...
The Right to Be Present at Trial: Insights from Smoak Fairey Jr. v. Tucker

The Right to Be Present at Trial: Insights from Smoak Fairey Jr. v. Tucker

Date: Jun 19, 2012
The Right to Be Present at Trial: Insights from Smoak Fairey Jr. v. Tucker Introduction The case of William Smoak Fairey, Jr., aka Doak Fairey v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of...
Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Defining the Role of Expert Testimony under the Confrontation Clause

Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Defining the Role of Expert Testimony under the Confrontation Clause

Date: Jun 19, 2012
Sandy Williams v. Illinois: Defining the Role of Expert Testimony under the Confrontation Clause Introduction Sandy Williams, Petitioner v. Illinois (567 U.S. 50) is a significant Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert