Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

State-Action Doctrine in Cable Public Access: Insights from Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck

State-Action Doctrine in Cable Public Access: Insights from Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck

Date: Jun 18, 2019
State-Action Doctrine in Cable Public Access: Insights from Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck Introduction Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S.Ct. 1921 (2019), is a pivotal...
Institutional Standing in Redistricting Appeals: Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill

Institutional Standing in Redistricting Appeals: Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill

Date: Jun 18, 2019
Institutional Standing in Redistricting Appeals: Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill Introduction Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill, 139 S. Ct. 1945 (2019), is a landmark decision...
Uranium Mining Preemption Clarified: Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren Sets New Boundaries under the Atomic Energy Act

Uranium Mining Preemption Clarified: Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren Sets New Boundaries under the Atomic Energy Act

Date: Jun 18, 2019
Uranium Mining Preemption Clarified: Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren Sets New Boundaries under the Atomic Energy Act Introduction In Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren (2019), the U.S. Supreme Court...
Clarifying State Law Applicability under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act: Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. Newton

Clarifying State Law Applicability under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act: Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. Newton

Date: Jun 11, 2019
Clarifying State Law Applicability under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act: Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. Newton Introduction The Supreme Court case Parker Drilling Management...
Quarles v. United States: Defining Remaining-in Burglary under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Quarles v. United States: Defining Remaining-in Burglary under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Date: Jun 11, 2019
Quarles v. United States: Defining Remaining-in Burglary under the Armed Career Criminal Act Introduction Quarles v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 1872 (2019), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Exclusion of Federal Agencies as "Persons" in AIA Post-Issuance Patent Review Proceedings

Exclusion of Federal Agencies as "Persons" in AIA Post-Issuance Patent Review Proceedings

Date: Jun 11, 2019
Exclusion of Federal Agencies as "Persons" in AIA Post-Issuance Patent Review Proceedings Introduction Return Mail, Inc. v. Postal Service, 139 S. Ct. 1853 (2019), addressed a pivotal question in...
Mont v. United States: Supreme Court Establishes Tolling of Supervised Release During Pretrial Detention

Mont v. United States: Supreme Court Establishes Tolling of Supervised Release During Pretrial Detention

Date: Jun 4, 2019
Mont v. United States: Supreme Court Establishes Tolling of Supervised Release During Pretrial Detention Introduction Mont v. United States is a landmark 2019 Supreme Court case that addressed...
Mandating Notice-and-Comment for Medicare Substantive Policy Changes: Azar v. Allina Health Services

Mandating Notice-and-Comment for Medicare Substantive Policy Changes: Azar v. Allina Health Services

Date: Jun 4, 2019
Mandating Notice-and-Comment for Medicare Substantive Policy Changes: Azar v. Allina Health Services Introduction Azar v. Allina Health Services is a landmark case decided by the United States...
Taggart v. Lorenzen: Establishing an Objective Standard for Civil Contempt in Bankruptcy Discharge Violations

Taggart v. Lorenzen: Establishing an Objective Standard for Civil Contempt in Bankruptcy Discharge Violations

Date: Jun 4, 2019
Taggart v. Lorenzen: Establishing an Objective Standard for Civil Contempt in Bankruptcy Discharge Violations Introduction Taggart v. Lorenzen is a landmark decision delivered by the United States...
Title VII Charge-Filing Requirement: Non-Jurisdictional Precondition in Fort Bend County v. Davis

Title VII Charge-Filing Requirement: Non-Jurisdictional Precondition in Fort Bend County v. Davis

Date: Jun 4, 2019
Title VII Charge-Filing Requirement: Non-Jurisdictional Precondition in Fort Bend County v. Davis Introduction Fort Bend County v. Davis (139 S. Ct. 1843) marks a significant decision by the United...
Nie v. s: Reinforcing Probable Cause in First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Claims

Nie v. s: Reinforcing Probable Cause in First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Claims

Date: May 29, 2019
Nie v. s: Reinforcing Probable Cause in First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Claims Introduction Nie v. s, 139 S. Ct. 1715 (2019), addressed a pivotal issue in constitutional law: whether the existence...
Home Depot v. Jackson: Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants Cannot Remove Claims under CAFA or 28 U.S.C. §1441(a)

Home Depot v. Jackson: Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants Cannot Remove Claims under CAFA or 28 U.S.C. §1441(a)

Date: May 29, 2019
Home Depot v. Jackson: Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants Cannot Remove Claims under CAFA or 28 U.S.C. §1441(a) Introduction In Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, 139 S. Ct. 1743 (2019), the United...
Smith v. Berryhill: Establishing Judicial Reviewability of Untimely Appeals Council Dismissals under § 405(g)

Smith v. Berryhill: Establishing Judicial Reviewability of Untimely Appeals Council Dismissals under § 405(g)

Date: May 29, 2019
Smith v. Berryhill: Establishing Judicial Reviewability of Untimely Appeals Council Dismissals under § 405(g) Introduction Smith v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1765 (2019), is a landmark decision by the...
Supreme Court Upholds Indiana’s Fetal Remains Disposal Regulations: A Rational Basis Analysis

Supreme Court Upholds Indiana’s Fetal Remains Disposal Regulations: A Rational Basis Analysis

Date: May 29, 2019
Supreme Court Upholds Indiana’s Fetal Remains Disposal Regulations: A Rational Basis Analysis Introduction Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 1780 (2019), is a...
Rejection of Executory Contracts Constitutes Breach Under Bankruptcy Code §365(g): Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC

Rejection of Executory Contracts Constitutes Breach Under Bankruptcy Code §365(g): Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC

Date: May 21, 2019
Rejection of Executory Contracts Constitutes Breach Under Bankruptcy Code §365(g): Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC Introduction Understanding the Implications of Contract Rejection...
Herrera v. Wyoming: Affirming the Continuation of Indian Treaty Hunting Rights Beyond Statehood

Herrera v. Wyoming: Affirming the Continuation of Indian Treaty Hunting Rights Beyond Statehood

Date: May 21, 2019
Herrera v. Wyoming: Affirming the Continuation of Indian Treaty Hunting Rights Beyond Statehood Introduction Herrera v. Wyoming (139 S. Ct. 1686) marks a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht: Clarifying Preemption Standards in Failure-to-Warn Claims

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht: Clarifying Preemption Standards in Failure-to-Warn Claims

Date: May 21, 2019
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht: Clarifying Preemption Standards in Failure-to-Warn Claims Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht, 139 S. Ct. 1668...
Cochise Consultancy v. Hunt: Statute of Limitations for Private Relators Under the False Claims Act

Cochise Consultancy v. Hunt: Statute of Limitations for Private Relators Under the False Claims Act

Date: May 14, 2019
Cochise Consultancy v. Hunt: Statute of Limitations for Private Relators Under the False Claims Act Introduction Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Hunt, 139 S. Ct. 1507 (2019), is a...
Supreme Court Upholds Lower Courts’ Discretion in Execution Stays: Price v. Dunn Analysis

Supreme Court Upholds Lower Courts’ Discretion in Execution Stays: Price v. Dunn Analysis

Date: May 14, 2019
Supreme Court Upholds Lower Courts’ Discretion in Execution Stays: Price v. Dunn Analysis Introduction Christopher Lee Price, the petitioner, sought to challenge the constitutionality of Alabama's...
Apple v. Pepper: Establishing Direct Purchaser Rights in Antitrust Litigation

Apple v. Pepper: Establishing Direct Purchaser Rights in Antitrust Litigation

Date: May 14, 2019
Apple v. Pepper: Establishing Direct Purchaser Rights in Antitrust Litigation Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Apple, Inc. v. Pepper (139 S. Ct. 1514) marks a significant milestone in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert