Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Finality in Capital Punishment: Supreme Court Denies Review in GRAY v. LUCAS

Finality in Capital Punishment: Supreme Court Denies Review in GRAY v. LUCAS

Date: Jul 14, 1983
Finality in Capital Punishment: Supreme Court Denies Review in GRAY v. LUCAS Introduction GRAY v. LUCAS, 463 U.S. 1237 (1983) is a significant case that reached the United States Supreme Court,...
Affirming State Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Barclay v. Florida Analysis

Affirming State Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Barclay v. Florida Analysis

Date: Jul 7, 1983
Affirming State Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Barclay v. Florida Analysis Introduction Barclay v. Florida, 463 U.S. 939 (1983), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that examines the...
Briggs Instruction and Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of California v. Ramos (1983)

Briggs Instruction and Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of California v. Ramos (1983)

Date: Jul 7, 1983
Briggs Instruction and Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of California v. Ramos (1983) Introduction California v. Ramos, 463 U.S. 992 (1983), presents a pivotal moment in the jurisprudence surrounding...
Illinois v. Batchelder: Upholding Due Process in Implied-Consent DUI Laws

Illinois v. Batchelder: Upholding Due Process in Implied-Consent DUI Laws

Date: Jul 7, 1983
Illinois v. Batchelder: Upholding Due Process in Implied-Consent DUI Laws Introduction Illinois v. Batchelder (463 U.S. 1112) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, decided on...
Michigan v. Long: Expanding the Scope of Protective Searches and Clarifying Federal Jurisdiction Over State Courts

Michigan v. Long: Expanding the Scope of Protective Searches and Clarifying Federal Jurisdiction Over State Courts

Date: Jul 7, 1983
Michigan v. Long: Expanding the Scope of Protective Searches and Clarifying Federal Jurisdiction Over State Courts Introduction Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), is a pivotal United States...
Affirmation of Psychiatric Testimony Predicting Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentences: BAREFOOT v. ESTELLE Establishes New Precedent

Affirmation of Psychiatric Testimony Predicting Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentences: BAREFOOT v. ESTELLE Establishes New Precedent

Date: Jul 7, 1983
Affirmation of Psychiatric Testimony Predicting Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentences: BAREFOOT v. ESTELLE Establishes New Precedent Introduction BAREFOOT v. ESTELLE, decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Miranda Requirements in Voluntary Encounters: Analysis of California v. Beheler

Miranda Requirements in Voluntary Encounters: Analysis of California v. Beheler

Date: Jul 7, 1983
Miranda Requirements in Voluntary Encounters: Analysis of California v. Beheler Introduction California v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 1121 (1983), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that further clarifies...
Equal Benefits Mandate in Deferred Compensation Plans: Analysis of Arizona Governing Committee v. Norris

Equal Benefits Mandate in Deferred Compensation Plans: Analysis of Arizona Governing Committee v. Norris

Date: Jul 7, 1983
Equal Benefits Mandate in Deferred Compensation Plans: Analysis of Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity and Deferred Compensation Plans et al. v. Norris (463 U.S. 1073) Introduction...
Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Exemption from State Taxation on Bank Shares in American Bank Trust Co. v. Dallas County

Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Exemption from State Taxation on Bank Shares in American Bank Trust Co. v. Dallas County

Date: Jul 6, 1983
Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Exemption from State Taxation on Bank Shares in American Bank Trust Co. v. Dallas County Introduction American Bank Trust Co. et al. v. Dallas County et al. is a...
Appointed Appellate Counsel Not Obligated to Press All Non-Frivolous Client Requested Issues

Appointed Appellate Counsel Not Obligated to Press All Non-Frivolous Client Requested Issues

Date: Jul 6, 1983
Appointed Appellate Counsel Not Obligated to Press All Non-Frivolous Client Requested Issues Introduction Jones, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al. v. Barnes (463 U.S. 745,...
Limitations on 42 U.S.C. §1985(3): Private Conspiracies and First Amendment Rights in United Brotherhood of Carpenters Joiners of America, Local 610, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Scott et al.

Limitations on 42 U.S.C. §1985(3): Private Conspiracies and First Amendment Rights in United Brotherhood of Carpenters Joiners of America, Local 610, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Scott et al.

Date: Jul 6, 1983
Limitations on 42 U.S.C. §1985(3): Private Conspiracies and First Amendment Rights Introduction United Brotherhood of Carpenters Joiners of America, Local 610, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Scott et al. (463...
Controlled Delivery and Fourth Amendment Protections in Illinois v. Andreas

Controlled Delivery and Fourth Amendment Protections in Illinois v. Andreas

Date: Jul 6, 1983
Controlled Delivery and Fourth Amendment Protections in Illinois v. Andreas Introduction Illinois v. Andreas, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on July 5, 1983, is a pivotal case concerning the...
Marsh v. Chambers: Upholding Legislative Prayer under the Establishment Clause

Marsh v. Chambers: Upholding Legislative Prayer under the Establishment Clause

Date: Jul 6, 1983
Marsh v. Chambers: Upholding Legislative Prayer under the Establishment Clause Introduction Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that addressed...
State Regulation of Alcohol Sales on Indian Reservations Under 18 U.S.C. § 1161

State Regulation of Alcohol Sales on Indian Reservations Under 18 U.S.C. § 1161

Date: Jul 2, 1983
State Regulation of Alcohol Sales on Indian Reservations Under 18 U.S.C. § 1161 Introduction The case Rice, Director, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of California v. Rehner (463 U.S. 713,...
Guardians Association v. Civil Service Commission: Limiting Remedies for Disparate Impact under Title VI

Guardians Association v. Civil Service Commission: Limiting Remedies for Disparate Impact under Title VI

Date: Jul 2, 1983
Guardians Association v. Civil Service Commission: Limiting Remedies for Disparate Impact under Title VI Introduction Guardians Association ET AL. v. Civil Service Commission of the City of New York...
Dirks v. SEC: Defining Fiduciary Duty for Tippees in Insider Trading

Dirks v. SEC: Defining Fiduciary Duty for Tippees in Insider Trading

Date: Jul 2, 1983
Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission: Defining Fiduciary Duty for Tippees in Insider Trading Introduction Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 463 U.S. 646 (1983), is a landmark...
Supreme Court Upholds Federal Dismissal of Indian Tribes' Water Rights Suits in Favor of State Adjudications

Supreme Court Upholds Federal Dismissal of Indian Tribes' Water Rights Suits in Favor of State Adjudications

Date: Jul 2, 1983
Supreme Court Upholds Federal Dismissal of Indian Tribes' Water Rights Suits in Favor of State Adjudications Introduction Arizona et al. v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Arizona et al. (463 U.S. 545,...
Appropriateness of Attorney's Fees Awards under §307(f) of the Clean Air Act: Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club

Appropriateness of Attorney's Fees Awards under §307(f) of the Clean Air Act: Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club

Date: Jul 2, 1983
Appropriateness of Attorney's Fees Awards under §307(f) of the Clean Air Act: Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club Introduction In Ruckelshaus, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency v. Sierra Club et...
Supreme Court Restricts Civil Access to Grand Jury Materials by Justice Department Attorneys in United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.

Supreme Court Restricts Civil Access to Grand Jury Materials by Justice Department Attorneys in United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.

Date: Jul 1, 1983
Supreme Court Restricts Civil Access to Grand Jury Materials by Justice Department Attorneys in United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc. Introduction United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., 463...
Belknap, Inc. v. Hale: State Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract Claims Survive NLRA Preemption

Belknap, Inc. v. Hale: State Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract Claims Survive NLRA Preemption

Date: Jul 1, 1983
Belknap, Inc. v. Hale: State Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract Claims Survive NLRA Preemption Introduction Belknap, Inc. v. Hale et al. (463 U.S. 491, 1983) is a significant U.S. Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert