Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

State-Action Immunity in Bar Admissions: Analysis of Hoover v. Ronwin

State-Action Immunity in Bar Admissions: Analysis of Hoover v. Ronwin

Date: May 15, 1984
State-Action Immunity in Bar Admissions: Analysis of Hoover v. Ronwin Introduction Hoover et al. v. Ronwin et al. (466 U.S. 558, 1984) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Hamilton v. Zant

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Hamilton v. Zant

Date: May 15, 1984
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Hamilton v. Zant Introduction The case of Roland Paul Hamilton v. Walter D. Zant, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and...
Expanding the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1001 to Include Investigative Functions: UNITED STATES v. RODGERS

Expanding the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1001 to Include Investigative Functions: UNITED STATES v. RODGERS

Date: May 1, 1984
Expanding the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1001 to Include Investigative Functions: UNITED STATES v. RODGERS Introduction UNITED STATES v. RODGERS (466 U.S. 475, 1984) is a landmark decision by the United...
Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications: Jurisdictional Clarity under the Sunshine Act

Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications: Jurisdictional Clarity under the Sunshine Act

Date: May 1, 1984
Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications: Jurisdictional Clarity under the Sunshine Act Introduction Federal Communications Commission (FCC) v. ITT World Communications, Inc.,...
Establishing Independent Appellate Review for 'Actual Malice' in Defamation Actions: BOSE Corp. v. Consumers Union

Establishing Independent Appellate Review for 'Actual Malice' in Defamation Actions: BOSE Corp. v. Consumers Union

Date: May 1, 1984
Establishing Independent Appellate Review for 'Actual Malice' in Defamation Actions: BOSE Corp. v. Consumers Union Introduction The landmark case BOSE CORP. v. CONSUMERS UNION OF UNITED STATES, Inc....
Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway Clerks: Refining Union Financial Obligations under the Railway Labor Act

Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway Clerks: Refining Union Financial Obligations under the Railway Labor Act

Date: Apr 26, 1984
Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway Clerks: Refining Union Financial Obligations under the Railway Labor Act Introduction In Ellis et al. v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline Steamship Clerks, Freight...
Racial Prejudice and Child Custody: Upholding Equal Protection in Palmore v. Sidoti

Racial Prejudice and Child Custody: Upholding Equal Protection in Palmore v. Sidoti

Date: Apr 26, 1984
Racial Prejudice and Child Custody: Upholding Equal Protection in Palmore v. Sidoti Introduction Palmore v. Sidoti is a landmark 1984 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the...
Limits on General Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia v. Hall et al.

Limits on General Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia v. Hall et al.

Date: Apr 25, 1984
Limits on General Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia v. Hall et al. Introduction The case of Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S. A. v. Hall et al.,...
Discriminatory Tax Credits under the Commerce Clause: Insights from Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Tully et al.

Discriminatory Tax Credits under the Commerce Clause: Insights from Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Tully et al.

Date: Apr 25, 1984
Discriminatory Tax Credits under the Commerce Clause: Insights from Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Tully et al. Introduction Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Tully et al. is a landmark case adjudicated...
Warrantless Searches of Impounded Vehicles: Establishing Precedent in Florida v. Meyers

Warrantless Searches of Impounded Vehicles: Establishing Precedent in Florida v. Meyers

Date: Apr 24, 1984
Warrantless Searches of Impounded Vehicles: Establishing Precedent in Florida v. Meyers Introduction Florida v. Meyers, 466 U.S. 380 (1984), is a significant United States Supreme Court case that...
Judicial Enforcement of Trust Agreements Without Arbitration: Analysis of Schneider Moving Storage Co. v. Robbins

Judicial Enforcement of Trust Agreements Without Arbitration: Analysis of Schneider Moving Storage Co. v. Robbins

Date: Apr 19, 1984
Judicial Enforcement of Trust Agreements Without Arbitration: Analysis of Schneider Moving Storage Co. v. Robbins Introduction Schneider Moving Storage Co. v. Robbins et al., 466 U.S. 364 (1984),...
James v. Kentucky: Affirmation of the Right Against Adverse Inferences from Silence

James v. Kentucky: Affirmation of the Right Against Adverse Inferences from Silence

Date: Apr 19, 1984
James v. Kentucky: Affirmation of the Right Against Adverse Inferences from Silence Introduction James v. Kentucky, 466 U.S. 341 (1984), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Arbitration Awards Do Not Bar §1983 Claims: McDonald v. City of West Branch

Arbitration Awards Do Not Bar §1983 Claims: McDonald v. City of West Branch

Date: Apr 19, 1984
Arbitration Awards Do Not Bar §1983 Claims: McDonald v. City of West Branch Introduction McDonald v. City of West Branch, Michigan, et al. is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court,...
Double Jeopardy Implications in Two-Tier Trial Systems: JUSTICES OF BOSTON MUNICIPAL COURT v. LYDON

Double Jeopardy Implications in Two-Tier Trial Systems: JUSTICES OF BOSTON MUNICIPAL COURT v. LYDON

Date: Apr 19, 1984
Double Jeopardy Implications in Two-Tier Trial Systems: JUSTICES OF BOSTON MUNICIPAL COURT v. LYDON Introduction JUSTICES OF BOSTON MUNICIPAL COURT v. LYDON, 466 U.S. 294 (1984), addressed a pivotal...
Overruling Hooven I: Redefining the Import-Export Clause in State Ad Valorem Property Taxation

Overruling Hooven I: Redefining the Import-Export Clause in State Ad Valorem Property Taxation

Date: Apr 19, 1984
Overruling Hooven I: Redefining the Import-Export Clause in State Ad Valorem Property Taxation Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Limbach, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. Hooven Allison...
State's Public Trust Easement Must Be Asserted During Federal Patent Proceedings: Summa Corp. v. California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission

State's Public Trust Easement Must Be Asserted During Federal Patent Proceedings: Summa Corp. v. California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission

Date: Apr 18, 1984
State's Public Trust Easement Must Be Asserted During Federal Patent Proceedings: Summa Corp. v. California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission Introduction Summa Corp. v. California Ex Rel. State Lands...
Reaffirming the Open Fields Doctrine: Analysis of Oliver v. United States (1984)

Reaffirming the Open Fields Doctrine: Analysis of Oliver v. United States (1984)

Date: Apr 18, 1984
Reaffirming the Open Fields Doctrine: Analysis of Oliver v. United States (1984) Introduction Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984), consolidated with Maine v. Thornton, 466 U.S. 170 (1984),...
Warsaw Convention Liability Limits Remain Enforceable Despite Repeal of Gold Price Legislation – TWA v. Franklin Mint Corp. Analysis

Warsaw Convention Liability Limits Remain Enforceable Despite Repeal of Gold Price Legislation – TWA v. Franklin Mint Corp. Analysis

Date: Apr 18, 1984
Warsaw Convention Liability Limits Remain Enforceable Despite Repeal of Gold Price Legislation – TWA v. Franklin Mint Corp. Analysis Introduction Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.,...
Fourth Amendment Protections Affirmed in INS Factory Surveys

Fourth Amendment Protections Affirmed in INS Factory Surveys

Date: Apr 18, 1984
Fourth Amendment Protections Affirmed in INS Factory Surveys Introduction In the landmark case Immigration and Naturalization Service ET AL v. Delgado ET AL. (466 U.S. 210), decided on April 17,...
Strict Adherence to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in Title VII Litigation: Insights from Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown

Strict Adherence to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in Title VII Litigation: Insights from Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown

Date: Apr 17, 1984
Strict Adherence to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in Title VII Litigation: Insights from Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown Introduction Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert