Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Supreme Court Upholds Rail Passenger Service Act's Reimbursement Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The decline of intercity passenger rail service in the United States during the...
Waiver of Rule 43 Rights in Criminal Trials: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. GAGNON et al. Introduction UNITED STATES v. GAGNON et al. is a landmark 1985 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that...
Reevaluating Death-Qualified Juries: Insights from WITT v. WAINWRIGHT Introduction Johnny Paul Witt v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al (470 U.S. 1039, 1985)...
Affirming Nonresident Lawyers' Rights under the Privileges and Immunities Clause: Piper v. New Hampshire Introduction PIPER v. SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, 470 U.S. 274 (1985), is a landmark...
Preclusion of Nonstatutory Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Carl Ray SONGER v. WAINWRIGHT Introduction Carl Ray Songer v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of...
Compelling Arbitration of Pendent State Claims: Insights from Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd Introduction Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd, 470 U.S. 213 (1985), is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Limiting Liability for Passenger Injury Under the Warsaw Convention: Air France v. Saks Introduction Air France v. Saks, 470 U.S. 392 (1985), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the scope...
Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Preclusive Effect of State Court Judgments on Federal Antitrust Claims Introduction Marrese et al. v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is...
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION v. COUNTY OF ONEIDA: Establishing Federal Common Law Rights and Eleventh Amendment Implications Introduction In the landmark case of County of Oneida, New York, v. Oneida Indian...
Suppressing Initial Unwarned Statements Does Not Affect Subsequent Valid Confessions: A Commentary on Oregon v. Elstad Introduction Oregon v. Elstad (470 U.S. 298, 1985) is a landmark decision by the...
EPA's Authority to Issue FDF Variances Under the Clean Water Act Affirmed in Chemical Manufacturers Association v. NRDC Introduction The case of Chemical Manufacturers Association et al. v. Natural...
Heckler v. Turner: Mandatory Tax Withholdings Considered Work Expenses in AFDC Benefit Calculations Introduction Heckler v. Turner et al. is a significant U.S. Supreme Court case decided on February...
Preclearance Requirements under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act: Insights from NAACP v. Hampton County Election Commission Introduction National Association for the Advancement of Colored People...
AKE v. Oklahoma: Recognizing the Right to Court-Appointed Psychiatric Assistance for Indigent Defendants Introduction AKE v. Oklahoma (470 U.S. 68, 1985) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Supreme Court Affirms Mississippi Sound as Historic Bay: Implications for Inland Water Ownership Introduction The case of UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA et al. (Alabama and Mississippi Boundary Case),...
Exculpatory Evidence Disclosure in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Brown v. Chaney Introduction Brown v. Chaney, 469 U.S. 1090 (1985) is a pivotal case addressing the obligations of prosecutors in...
Affirmative Action and State Employers: Insights from James Bushey v. New York State Civil Service Commission Introduction James Bushey v. New York State Civil Service Commission (469 U.S. 1117) is a...
Due Process Protections for General Assistance Applicants: Insights from Cindy GREGORY v. TOWN OF PITTSFIELD Introduction Cindy GREGORY v. TOWN OF PITTSFIELD, 470 U.S. 1018 (1985), represents a...
Limits on Appellate Review of Prosecutorial Misconduct: UNITED STATES v. YOUNG Introduction UNITED STATES v. YOUNG (470 U.S. 1) is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on February 20, 1985. The case...
Application of EDWARDS v. ARIZONA to Directly Appealed Cases: SHEA v. Louisiana Introduction SHEA v. LOUISIANA (470 U.S. 51) is a pivotal decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that addresses the...