Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Eighth Amendment Protection Against Execution of the Insane: FORD v. WAINWRIGHT Analysis

Eighth Amendment Protection Against Execution of the Insane: FORD v. WAINWRIGHT Analysis

Date: Jun 27, 1986
Eighth Amendment Protection Against Execution of the Insane: FORD v. WAINWRIGHT Analysis Introduction FORD v. WAINWRIGHT, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Establishing the "Colorable Innocence" Standard for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Kuhlmenn v. Wilson (1986)

Establishing the "Colorable Innocence" Standard for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Kuhlmenn v. Wilson (1986)

Date: Jun 27, 1986
Establishing the "Colorable Innocence" Standard for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Kuhlmenn v. Wilson (1986) Introduction Kuhlmenn v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436 (1986), stands as a pivotal Supreme...
Inadvertence Insufficient for Cause in Federal Habeas Procedural Defaults: Insights from Murray v. Carrier

Inadvertence Insufficient for Cause in Federal Habeas Procedural Defaults: Insights from Murray v. Carrier

Date: Jun 27, 1986
Inadvertence Insufficient for Cause in Federal Habeas Procedural Defaults: Insights from Murray v. Carrier Introduction The landmark decision in Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478 (1986), addresses the...
Murray v. Carrier: Upholding Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Murray v. Carrier: Upholding Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Jun 27, 1986
Murray v. Carrier: Upholding Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Murray v. Carrier is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the standards...
Supreme Court Restricts §1983 Compensatory Damages: Memphis Community School District v. Stachura

Supreme Court Restricts §1983 Compensatory Damages: Memphis Community School District v. Stachura

Date: Jun 26, 1986
Supreme Court Restricts §1983 Compensatory Damages: Memphis Community School District v. Stachura Introduction Memphis Community School District et al. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299 (1986), is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Associational Standing for Unions in Federal Court: UAW v. Brock

Affirmation of Associational Standing for Unions in Federal Court: UAW v. Brock

Date: Jun 26, 1986
Affirmation of Associational Standing for Unions in Federal Court: UAW v. Brock Introduction The case of International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of...
Final Determination Essential for Regulatory Takings Claims: Insights from MacDonald v. County of Yolo

Final Determination Essential for Regulatory Takings Claims: Insights from MacDonald v. County of Yolo

Date: Jun 26, 1986
Final Determination Essential for Regulatory Takings Claims: Insights from MacDonald v. County of Yolo Introduction The case of MacDonald, Sommer Frates v. County of Yolo (477 U.S. 340, 1986)...
Clarifying the Burden of Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

Clarifying the Burden of Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

Date: Jun 26, 1986
Clarifying the Burden of Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Introduction Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), is a seminal case in United...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Summary Judgment Motions Established in Anderson v. Liberty Lobby

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Summary Judgment Motions Established in Anderson v. Liberty Lobby

Date: Jun 26, 1986
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Summary Judgment Motions Established in Anderson v. Liberty Lobby Introduction Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986), is a landmark decision...
Defining 'Trade or Business' under Unrelated Business Income Tax: Analysis of United States v. American Bar Endowment

Defining 'Trade or Business' under Unrelated Business Income Tax: Analysis of United States v. American Bar Endowment

Date: Jun 24, 1986
Defining 'Trade or Business' under Unrelated Business Income Tax: Analysis of United States v. American Bar Endowment Introduction The case of United States v. American Bar Endowment et al., decided...
Affirmation of State Flexibility in Medicaid Spenddown Calculation: Atkins v. Rivera

Affirmation of State Flexibility in Medicaid Spenddown Calculation: Atkins v. Rivera

Date: Jun 24, 1986
Affirmation of State Flexibility in Medicaid Spenddown Calculation: Atkins v. Rivera Introduction Atkins, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Public Welfare v. Rivera et al. is a landmark...
DARDEN v. WAINWRIGHT: Clarifying Juror Exclusion and Prosecutorial Conduct in Capital Trials

DARDEN v. WAINWRIGHT: Clarifying Juror Exclusion and Prosecutorial Conduct in Capital Trials

Date: Jun 24, 1986
DARDEN v. WAINWRIGHT: Clarifying Juror Exclusion and Prosecutorial Conduct in Capital Trials Introduction DARDEN v. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 477 U.S. 168 (1986), is a...
DOHSA Pre-empts State Wrongful Death Remedies on the High Seas – Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire

DOHSA Pre-empts State Wrongful Death Remedies on the High Seas – Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire

Date: Jun 24, 1986
DOHSA Pre-empts State Wrongful Death Remedies on the High Seas – Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire Introduction In the landmark case of Offshore Logistics, Inc., et al. v. Tallentire et al. (477...
Upholding State Environmental Protections: The Constitutional Validity of Maine’s Live Baitfish Importation Ban

Upholding State Environmental Protections: The Constitutional Validity of Maine’s Live Baitfish Importation Ban

Date: Jun 24, 1986
Upholding State Environmental Protections: The Constitutional Validity of Maine’s Live Baitfish Importation Ban Introduction In the pivotal case of Maine v. Taylor et al., the United States Supreme...
Establishing Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment under Title VII: Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson

Establishing Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment under Title VII: Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson

Date: Jun 20, 1986
Establishing Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment under Title VII: Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson Introduction Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), stands as a seminal case in...
Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security Entrapment: Upholding Congressional Authority Over Social Security Agreements

Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security Entrapment: Upholding Congressional Authority Over Social Security Agreements

Date: Jun 20, 1986
Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security Entrapment: Upholding Congressional Authority Over Social Security Agreements Introduction Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v....
McMILLAN v. PENNSYLVANIA: Upholding Mandatory Minimum Sentences for Firearm Possession in Felony Offenses

McMILLAN v. PENNSYLVANIA: Upholding Mandatory Minimum Sentences for Firearm Possession in Felony Offenses

Date: Jun 20, 1986
McMILLAN v. PENNSYLVANIA: Upholding Mandatory Minimum Sentences for Firearm Possession in Felony Offenses Introduction McMILLAN et al. v. PENNSYLVANIA, 477 U.S. 79 (1986), is a landmark decision by...
Strict Application of Rule 15(c) in Defamation Actions: SCHIAVONE ET AL. v. TIME, Inc.

Strict Application of Rule 15(c) in Defamation Actions: SCHIAVONE ET AL. v. TIME, Inc.

Date: Jun 19, 1986
Strict Application of Rule 15(c) in Defamation Actions SCHIAVONE ET AL. v. FORTUNE, AKA TIME, INC. (477 U.S. 21) U.S. Supreme Court, June 18, 1986 Introduction Schiavone et al. v. Fortune, aka Time,...
Federal Aviation Act Permits State Taxation of Aviation Fuel in Foreign Commerce: Analysis of Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue

Federal Aviation Act Permits State Taxation of Aviation Fuel in Foreign Commerce: Analysis of Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue

Date: Jun 19, 1986
Federal Aviation Act Permits State Taxation of Aviation Fuel in Foreign Commerce: Analysis of Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue Introduction Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida...
New Precedent on Civil Service Preferences: Equal Protection and Right to Travel

New Precedent on Civil Service Preferences: Equal Protection and Right to Travel

Date: Jun 18, 1986
New Precedent on Civil Service Preferences: Equal Protection and Right to Travel Introduction In Attorney General of New York v. Soto-Lopez et al., 476 U.S. 898 (1986), the United States Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert