Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Restitution Obligations as Non-Dischargeable Under §523(a)(7): Kelly v. Robinson

Restitution Obligations as Non-Dischargeable Under §523(a)(7): Kelly v. Robinson

Date: Nov 13, 1986
Restitution Obligations as Non-Dischargeable Under §523(a)(7): Kelly v. Robinson Introduction KELLY, CONNECTICUT CHIEF STATE'S ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. ROBINSON, 479 U.S. 36 (1986), is a landmark decision...
Attorney’s Fees Limited to Enforcement Proceedings under Civil Rights Act §1988: NC Dept of Transportation v. Crest Street Community Council

Attorney’s Fees Limited to Enforcement Proceedings under Civil Rights Act §1988: NC Dept of Transportation v. Crest Street Community Council

Date: Nov 5, 1986
Attorney’s Fees Limited to Enforcement Proceedings under Civil Rights Act §1988: NC Dept of Transportation v. Crest Street Community Council Introduction NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION...
Taxation Scope Limited to Panamanian Jurisdiction in O'Connor et ux. v. United States

Taxation Scope Limited to Panamanian Jurisdiction in O'Connor et ux. v. United States

Date: Nov 5, 1986
Taxation Scope Limited to Panamanian Jurisdiction in O'Connor et ux. v. United States Introduction O'Connor et ux. v. United States (479 U.S. 27, 1986) is a significant United States Supreme Court...
Peremptory Challenges and Juror Attitudes: Insights from David J. Brown v. North Carolina

Peremptory Challenges and Juror Attitudes: Insights from David J. Brown v. North Carolina

Date: Nov 4, 1986
Peremptory Challenges and Juror Attitudes: Insights from David J. Brown v. North Carolina Introduction David J. Brown v. North Carolina, 479 U.S. 940 (1986), is a significant case in the realm of...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from ALDRICH v. WAINWRIGHT

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from ALDRICH v. WAINWRIGHT

Date: Oct 21, 1986
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from ALDRICH v. WAINWRIGHT Introduction ALDRICH v. WAINWRIGHT (479 U.S. 918, 1986) is a pivotal case in the realm of criminal defense,...
Denial of Certiorari in Dufour v. Mississippi: Implications for Capital Punishment and Effective Assistance of Counsel

Denial of Certiorari in Dufour v. Mississippi: Implications for Capital Punishment and Effective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Oct 15, 1986
Denial of Certiorari in Dufour v. Mississippi: Implications for Capital Punishment and Effective Assistance of Counsel Introduction Donald William Dufour v. Mississippi, 479 U.S. 891 (1986), is a...
Porter v. Illinois: Reinforcing Due Process in Juror Bias Evaluation

Porter v. Illinois: Reinforcing Due Process in Juror Bias Evaluation

Date: Oct 15, 1986
Porter v. Illinois: Reinforcing Due Process in Juror Bias Evaluation Introduction Porter v. Illinois (479 U.S. 898, 1986) is a pivotal case that addresses the procedural obligations of trial judges...
Double-Counting of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Sentencing: Insights from William Wiley v. Mississippi

Double-Counting of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Sentencing: Insights from William Wiley v. Mississippi

Date: Oct 15, 1986
Double-Counting of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Sentencing: Insights from William Wiley v. Mississippi Introduction William Wiley v. Mississippi, 479 U.S. 906 (1986), is a significant case that...
Impact of Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony on Confrontation Rights: Analysis of Bundy v. Florida

Impact of Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony on Confrontation Rights: Analysis of Bundy v. Florida

Date: Oct 15, 1986
Impact of Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony on Confrontation Rights: Analysis of Bundy v. Florida Introduction The case of Theodore Robert Bundy v. Florida (479 U.S. 894, 1986-10-14) presents critical...
Procedural Default and Racial Discrimination in Capital Sentencing: STEWART v. WAINWRIGHT

Procedural Default and Racial Discrimination in Capital Sentencing: STEWART v. WAINWRIGHT

Date: Oct 4, 1986
Procedural Default and Racial Discrimination in Capital Sentencing: STEWART v. WAINWRIGHT Introduction Roy Allen Stewart v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, No....
Rook v. Rice: Establishing the "Ends of Justice" Exception in Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions

Rook v. Rice: Establishing the "Ends of Justice" Exception in Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Sep 19, 1986
Rook v. Rice: Establishing the "Ends of Justice" Exception in Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Rook v. Rice, 478 U.S. 1040 (1986), is a pivotal case in the realm of criminal...
Upholding Public Health Regulations: First Amendment Permits Closure of Non-Expressive Adult Bookstores

Upholding Public Health Regulations: First Amendment Permits Closure of Non-Expressive Adult Bookstores

Date: Jul 8, 1986
Upholding Public Health Regulations: First Amendment Permits Closure of Non-Expressive Adult Bookstores Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Arcara, District Attorney of Erie County v. Cloud...
Preclusive Effect of State Administrative Factfinding in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Insights from University of Tennessee v. Elliott

Preclusive Effect of State Administrative Factfinding in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Insights from University of Tennessee v. Elliott

Date: Jul 8, 1986
Preclusive Effect of State Administrative Factfinding in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Insights from University of Tennessee v. Elliott Introduction University of Tennessee v. Elliott, 478 U.S. 788...
Affirming Separation of Powers: Impact of Bowshser v. Synar on Congressional Delegation of Executive Authority

Affirming Separation of Powers: Impact of Bowshser v. Synar on Congressional Delegation of Executive Authority

Date: Jul 8, 1986
Affirming Separation of Powers: Impact of Bowshser v. Synar on Congressional Delegation of Executive Authority Introduction Bowshser, Comptroller General of the United States v. Synar, Member of...
No Federal-Question Jurisdiction for State Claims Incorporating Non-Private Federal Standards: Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson

No Federal-Question Jurisdiction for State Claims Incorporating Non-Private Federal Standards: Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson

Date: Jul 8, 1986
No Federal-Question Jurisdiction for State Claims Incorporating Non-Private Federal Standards: Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Introduction In the landmark case of Merrell Dow...
CFTC Authority Over State Law Counterclaims: Insights from Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor

CFTC Authority Over State Law Counterclaims: Insights from Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor

Date: Jul 8, 1986
CFTC Authority Over State Law Counterclaims: Insights from Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor Introduction Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor et al., 478 U.S. 833 (1986),...
Limits of Student Free Speech: Bethel School District v. Fraser and the Authority to Discipline for Obscene Speech in Public Schools

Limits of Student Free Speech: Bethel School District v. Fraser and the Authority to Discipline for Obscene Speech in Public Schools

Date: Jul 8, 1986
Limits of Student Free Speech: Bethel School District v. Fraser and the Authority to Discipline for Obscene Speech in Public Schools Introduction Bethel School District No. 403 et al. v. Fraser, 478...
State Autonomy Affirmed: The Balance Between Unemployment Compensation and Labor Rights in BAKER v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

State Autonomy Affirmed: The Balance Between Unemployment Compensation and Labor Rights in BAKER v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

Date: Jul 3, 1986
State Autonomy Affirmed: The Balance Between Unemployment Compensation and Labor Rights in BAKER v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. Introduction In the landmark case Baker et al. v. General Motors Corp. et al.,...
Clarifying the Application of Harmless-Error Doctrine in Jury Instructions: Insights from Rose, Warden v. Clark

Clarifying the Application of Harmless-Error Doctrine in Jury Instructions: Insights from Rose, Warden v. Clark

Date: Jul 3, 1986
Clarifying the Application of Harmless-Error Doctrine in Jury Instructions: Insights from Rose, Warden v. Clark Introduction Rose, Warden v. Clark, 478 U.S. 570 (1986) is a pivotal United States...
Randall v. Loftsgaarden: Clarifying Rescissory Remedies in Securities Fraud Cases

Randall v. Loftsgaarden: Clarifying Rescissory Remedies in Securities Fraud Cases

Date: Jul 3, 1986
Randall v. Loftsgaarden: Clarifying Rescissory Remedies in Securities Fraud Cases Introduction Randall et al. v. Loftsgaarden et al., 478 U.S. 647 (1986), is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert