Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Reaffirming the Reasonable Person Standard in Obscenity Law: Pope v. Illinois Introduction Pope et al. v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 (1987), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Federal Courts Restricted from Enjoining Secondary Picketing in Railway Labor Disputes under the Norris-LaGuardia Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Burlington Northern Railroad Co. et al. v....
Seventh Amendment Guarantees Jury Trial on Liability but Not on Civil Penalties: A Detailed Analysis of Tull v. United States Introduction Tull v. United States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987), is a seminal...
MeeSe v. Keene: Upholding the Constitutionality of the Foreign Agents Registration Act's "Political Propaganda" Classification Introduction MeeSe, Attorney General of the United States, et al. v....
Permissibility of Retrial on Different Charges When Initial Conviction is Void: Montana v. Hall (1987) Introduction Montana v. Hall, 481 U.S. 400 (1987), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Content-Based Selective Taxation on Media Violates First Amendment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland Introduction Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland, 481...
Supreme Court Sets Standard for Deducting Self-Insured Medical Claims under the 'All Events' Test Introduction United States v. General Dynamics Corp. Et Al., 481 U.S. 239 (1987), is a landmark...
McCLESKEY v. KEMP: Upholding Discretion in Capital Sentencing Amid Racial Disparities Introduction McCLESKEY v. KEMP, 481 U.S. 279 (1987), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Classification of Personal Injury Awards as Income under AFDC: Lukhard v. Reed Introduction The Supreme Court case Lukhard, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Social Services v. Reed et al. (481...
Hitchcock v. Dugger: Affirming the Requirement to Consider All Relevant Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction Hitchcock v. Dugger, Florida Department of Corrections (481 U.S. 393,...
Procedural Due Process in §405 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act: Analysis of BROCK v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, Inc. Introduction BROCK, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 481...
Granberry v. Greer: Establishing Discretionary Review of Nonexhaustion in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Granberry v. Greer, 481 U.S. 129 (1987), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Cruz v. New York: Strengthening Confrontation Clause Protections in Joint Trials Introduction Cruz v. New York, 481 U.S. 186 (1987), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that further...
State Regulation of Tender Offers Not Preempted by Williams Act: CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Introduction CTS Corporation appealed against Dynamics Corporation of America following a tender offer that...
Clarifying Rule 6(e): Permitted Use of Grand Jury Materials in Civil Proceedings Introduction United States v. John Doe, Inc. I, et al. (481 U.S. 102, 1987) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Tison v. Arizona: Establishing Reckless Indifference in Felony-Murder Cases Introduction Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that redefined the application of...
Redacted Codefendant Confessions in Joint Trials: Upholding the Confrontation Clause – Richardson v. Marsh Introduction Richardson, Warden v. Marsh (481 U.S. 200, 1987) is a pivotal United States...
WEST v. CONRAIL ET AL.: Establishing Filing Timeliness in Hybrid Labor Suits 1. Introduction WEST v. CONRAIL ET AL., 481 U.S. 35 (1987), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that significantly...
Pennzoil v. Texaco: Reinforcing Federalism through Younger Abstention 1. Introduction Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc., 481 U.S. 1 (1987), is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court...