Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Reaffirming the Reasonable Person Standard in Obscenity Law: Pope v. Illinois

Reaffirming the Reasonable Person Standard in Obscenity Law: Pope v. Illinois

Date: May 5, 1987
Reaffirming the Reasonable Person Standard in Obscenity Law: Pope v. Illinois Introduction Pope et al. v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 (1987), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Federal Courts Restricted from Enjoining Secondary Picketing in Railway Labor Disputes under the Norris-LaGuardia Act

Federal Courts Restricted from Enjoining Secondary Picketing in Railway Labor Disputes under the Norris-LaGuardia Act

Date: Apr 29, 1987
Federal Courts Restricted from Enjoining Secondary Picketing in Railway Labor Disputes under the Norris-LaGuardia Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Burlington Northern Railroad Co. et al. v....
Seventh Amendment Guarantees Jury Trial on Liability but Not on Civil Penalties: A Detailed Analysis of Tull v. United States

Seventh Amendment Guarantees Jury Trial on Liability but Not on Civil Penalties: A Detailed Analysis of Tull v. United States

Date: Apr 29, 1987
Seventh Amendment Guarantees Jury Trial on Liability but Not on Civil Penalties: A Detailed Analysis of Tull v. United States Introduction Tull v. United States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987), is a seminal...
MeeSe v. Keene: Upholding the Constitutionality of the Foreign Agents Registration Act's "Political Propaganda" Classification

MeeSe v. Keene: Upholding the Constitutionality of the Foreign Agents Registration Act's "Political Propaganda" Classification

Date: Apr 29, 1987
MeeSe v. Keene: Upholding the Constitutionality of the Foreign Agents Registration Act's "Political Propaganda" Classification Introduction MeeSe, Attorney General of the United States, et al. v....
Permitting Federal Review of Railroad Property Tax Overvaluation under §306: Burlington Northern R.R. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Permitting Federal Review of Railroad Property Tax Overvaluation under §306: Burlington Northern R.R. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Date: Apr 29, 1987
Permitting Federal Review of Railroad Property Tax Overvaluation under §306: Burlington Northern R.R. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission Introduction Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Oklahoma Tax...
Permissibility of Retrial on Different Charges When Initial Conviction is Void: Montana v. Hall (1987)

Permissibility of Retrial on Different Charges When Initial Conviction is Void: Montana v. Hall (1987)

Date: Apr 28, 1987
Permissibility of Retrial on Different Charges When Initial Conviction is Void: Montana v. Hall (1987) Introduction Montana v. Hall, 481 U.S. 400 (1987), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Content-Based Selective Taxation on Media Violates First Amendment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland

Content-Based Selective Taxation on Media Violates First Amendment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland

Date: Apr 23, 1987
Content-Based Selective Taxation on Media Violates First Amendment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland Introduction Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland, 481...
Supreme Court Sets Standard for Deducting Self-Insured Medical Claims under the 'All Events' Test

Supreme Court Sets Standard for Deducting Self-Insured Medical Claims under the 'All Events' Test

Date: Apr 23, 1987
Supreme Court Sets Standard for Deducting Self-Insured Medical Claims under the 'All Events' Test Introduction United States v. General Dynamics Corp. Et Al., 481 U.S. 239 (1987), is a landmark...
McCLESKEY v. KEMP: Upholding Discretion in Capital Sentencing Amid Racial Disparities

McCLESKEY v. KEMP: Upholding Discretion in Capital Sentencing Amid Racial Disparities

Date: Apr 23, 1987
McCLESKEY v. KEMP: Upholding Discretion in Capital Sentencing Amid Racial Disparities Introduction McCLESKEY v. KEMP, 481 U.S. 279 (1987), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Classification of Personal Injury Awards as Income under AFDC: Lukhard v. Reed

Classification of Personal Injury Awards as Income under AFDC: Lukhard v. Reed

Date: Apr 23, 1987
Classification of Personal Injury Awards as Income under AFDC: Lukhard v. Reed Introduction The Supreme Court case Lukhard, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Social Services v. Reed et al. (481...
Hitchcock v. Dugger: Affirming the Requirement to Consider All Relevant Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Hitchcock v. Dugger: Affirming the Requirement to Consider All Relevant Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Date: Apr 23, 1987
Hitchcock v. Dugger: Affirming the Requirement to Consider All Relevant Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction Hitchcock v. Dugger, Florida Department of Corrections (481 U.S. 393,...
Procedural Due Process in §§405 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act: Analysis of BROCK v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, Inc.

Procedural Due Process in §§405 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act: Analysis of BROCK v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, Inc.

Date: Apr 23, 1987
Procedural Due Process in §405 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act: Analysis of BROCK v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, Inc. Introduction BROCK, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 481...
Granberry v. Greer: Establishing Discretionary Review of Nonexhaustion in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Granberry v. Greer: Establishing Discretionary Review of Nonexhaustion in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Apr 22, 1987
Granberry v. Greer: Establishing Discretionary Review of Nonexhaustion in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Granberry v. Greer, 481 U.S. 129 (1987), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Cruz v. New York: Strengthening Confrontation Clause Protections in Joint Trials

Cruz v. New York: Strengthening Confrontation Clause Protections in Joint Trials

Date: Apr 22, 1987
Cruz v. New York: Strengthening Confrontation Clause Protections in Joint Trials Introduction Cruz v. New York, 481 U.S. 186 (1987), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that further...
State Regulation of Tender Offers Not Preempted by Williams Act: CTS Corp. v. Dynamics

State Regulation of Tender Offers Not Preempted by Williams Act: CTS Corp. v. Dynamics

Date: Apr 22, 1987
State Regulation of Tender Offers Not Preempted by Williams Act: CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Introduction CTS Corporation appealed against Dynamics Corporation of America following a tender offer that...
Clarifying Rule 6(e): Permitted Use of Grand Jury Materials in Civil Proceedings

Clarifying Rule 6(e): Permitted Use of Grand Jury Materials in Civil Proceedings

Date: Apr 22, 1987
Clarifying Rule 6(e): Permitted Use of Grand Jury Materials in Civil Proceedings Introduction United States v. John Doe, Inc. I, et al. (481 U.S. 102, 1987) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Tison v. Arizona: Establishing Reckless Indifference in Felony-Murder Cases

Tison v. Arizona: Establishing Reckless Indifference in Felony-Murder Cases

Date: Apr 22, 1987
Tison v. Arizona: Establishing Reckless Indifference in Felony-Murder Cases Introduction Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that redefined the application of...
Redacted Codefendant Confessions in Joint Trials: Upholding the Confrontation Clause – Richardson v. Marsh

Redacted Codefendant Confessions in Joint Trials: Upholding the Confrontation Clause – Richardson v. Marsh

Date: Apr 22, 1987
Redacted Codefendant Confessions in Joint Trials: Upholding the Confrontation Clause – Richardson v. Marsh Introduction Richardson, Warden v. Marsh (481 U.S. 200, 1987) is a pivotal United States...
WEST v. CONRAIL ET AL.: Establishing Filing Timeliness in Hybrid Labor Suits

WEST v. CONRAIL ET AL.: Establishing Filing Timeliness in Hybrid Labor Suits

Date: Apr 7, 1987
WEST v. CONRAIL ET AL.: Establishing Filing Timeliness in Hybrid Labor Suits 1. Introduction WEST v. CONRAIL ET AL., 481 U.S. 35 (1987), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that significantly...
Pennzoil v. Texaco: Reinforcing Federalism through Younger Abstention

Pennzoil v. Texaco: Reinforcing Federalism through Younger Abstention

Date: Apr 7, 1987
Pennzoil v. Texaco: Reinforcing Federalism through Younger Abstention 1. Introduction Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc., 481 U.S. 1 (1987), is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert