Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Broad Definition of Capital Asset Affirmed: Arkansas Best Corp. v. Commissioner Introduction Arkansas Best Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is a landmark decision by the United States...
Jurisdiction over Gray-Market Goods Importation: Insights from K MART Corp. v. Cartier, Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court case K MART Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 485 U.S. 176 (1988), addresses critical...
City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik: Defining Final Policymaking Authority for §1983 Municipal Liability Introduction City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Defining Jurisdictional Boundaries: Supreme Court's Decision on Mississippi Sound in Boundary Litigation Introduction The case of UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA et al. (ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI BOUNDARY...
INS v. Abudu (1988): Abuse-of-Discretion Standard for BIA Denials of Motion to Reopen Deportation Proceedings 485 U.S. 94 (1988) Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu is a...
Strengthening Fair Trial Guarantees: Insights from Justice Marshall's Dissent in Brecheen v. Oklahoma Introduction Robert A. Brecheen v. Oklahoma (485 U.S. 909) is a significant case that reached the...
Supreme Court Dissent in Engle v. Florida: Death Penalty as Cruel and Unusual Punishment Introduction Gregory Scott Engle v. Florida, 485 U.S. 924 (1988), is a significant case that sheds light on...
PENNELL v. CITY OF SAN JOSE: Upholding Rent Control Ordinances Under the Constitution Introduction Pennell et al. v. City of San Jose et al. (485 U.S. 1) is a significant Supreme Court case decided...
Enhancing Due Process Protections in Default Judgments: Peralta v. Heights Medical Center Introduction Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc. is a landmark 1988 decision by the United States Supreme...
Mathews v. United States: Expanding the Entrapment Defense in Federal Criminal Law Introduction Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58 (1988), is a landmark Supreme Court case that redefined the...
Limitations on Withholding SSI Benefits for Attorney's Fees in Title XVI Cases Introduction BOWEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. GALBREATH (485 U.S. 74) is a landmark decision by the...
Prosecutorial Responses to Defense Assertions and the Fifth Amendment: Insights from UNITED STATES v. ROBINSON Introduction UNITED STATES v. ROBINSON, 485 U.S. 25 (1988), is a seminal Supreme Court...
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell: Upholding First Amendment Protections for Parodic Speech Against Public Figures Introduction Hustler Magazine, Inc., et al. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), is a landmark...
State Ownership of Tidelands: Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Mississippi Introduction Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Mississippi, 484 U.S. 469 (1988), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Merit Systems Protection Board Limited in Reviewing Security Clearance Denials: Department of the Navy v. Egan Introduction Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988), is a pivotal Supreme...
ERISA §515 and Collective Bargaining: Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdictional Boundaries Introduction In the landmark case Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al. v....
Limitation of Interior Secretary’s Authority Over Army-Controlled Reservoirs: ETSI Pipeline Project v. Missouri Introduction The case of ETSI Pipeline Project v. Missouri et al. (484 U.S. 495, 1988)...
Confrontation Clause and Hearsay: Insights from UNITED STATES v. OWENS Introduction UNITED STATES v. OWENS, 484 U.S. 554 (1988), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that examines the intersection of the...
Taylor v. Illinois: Balancing Discovery Sanctions with the Right to Present a Defense Introduction Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400 (1988), is a seminal U.S. Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Supreme Court Rules CSRA Bars Tucker Act Claims for Nonpreference Excepted Service Employees: United States v. Fausto Introduction United States v. Fausto (484 U.S. 439, 1988) is a landmark decision...