Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Offense-Specific Application of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel: Insights from Texas v. Cobb

Offense-Specific Application of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel: Insights from Texas v. Cobb

Date: Apr 3, 2001
Offense-Specific Application of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel: Insights from Texas v. Cobb Introduction Texas v. Cobb is a seminal judgment delivered by the United States Supreme Court on...
FAA Exemption Limited to Transportation Workers in Circuit City v. Adams

FAA Exemption Limited to Transportation Workers in Circuit City v. Adams

Date: Mar 22, 2001
FAA Exemption Limited to Transportation Workers in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams Introduction In Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams (532 U.S. 105, 2001), the United States Supreme Court...
ERISA's Supremacy in Beneficiary Designations: Comprehensive Commentary on Egelhoff v. Egelhoff

ERISA's Supremacy in Beneficiary Designations: Comprehensive Commentary on Egelhoff v. Egelhoff

Date: Mar 22, 2001
ERISA's Supremacy in Beneficiary Designations: Comprehensive Commentary on Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Introduction Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 U.S. 141 (2001), addresses the intricate interplay between...
State Hospitals Cannot Conduct Warrantless Drug Tests for Law Enforcement Purposes

State Hospitals Cannot Conduct Warrantless Drug Tests for Law Enforcement Purposes

Date: Mar 22, 2001
State Hospitals Cannot Conduct Warrantless Drug Tests for Law Enforcement Purposes Introduction Ferguson et al. v. City of Charleston et al. (532 U.S. 67) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Shafer v. South Carolina: Affirming the Right to Inform Juries of No-Parole Sentences in Capital Cases

Shafer v. South Carolina: Affirming the Right to Inform Juries of No-Parole Sentences in Capital Cases

Date: Mar 21, 2001
Shafer v. South Carolina: Affirming the Right to Inform Juries of No-Parole Sentences in Capital Cases Introduction Shafer v. South Carolina is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme...
Deferential Appellate Review in Functional Consolidation: Paula L. Buford v. United States

Deferential Appellate Review in Functional Consolidation: Paula L. Buford v. United States

Date: Mar 21, 2001
Deferential Appellate Review in Functional Consolidation: Paula L. Buford v. United States Introduction Paula L. Buford v. United States is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on March 20, 2001,...
Functionality of Product Features Precludes Trade Dress Protection: TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays

Functionality of Product Features Precludes Trade Dress Protection: TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays

Date: Mar 21, 2001
Functionality of Product Features Precludes Trade Dress Protection: TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Traffix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing...
Protecting Innocent Witnesses under the Fifth Amendment: A Comprehensive Commentary on Ohio v. Reiner

Protecting Innocent Witnesses under the Fifth Amendment: A Comprehensive Commentary on Ohio v. Reiner

Date: Mar 20, 2001
Protecting Innocent Witnesses under the Fifth Amendment: A Comprehensive Commentary on Ohio v. Reiner Introduction Ohio v. Matthew Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001), is a landmark case decided by the United...
FOIA Exemption 5 and Tribal Communications: Insights from Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association

FOIA Exemption 5 and Tribal Communications: Insights from Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association

Date: Mar 6, 2001
FOIA Exemption 5 and Tribal Communications: Insights from Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association Introduction The case of Department of the Interior et al. v....
First Amendment Protections Affirmed in LSC v. Velazquez

First Amendment Protections Affirmed in LSC v. Velazquez

Date: Mar 1, 2001
First Amendment Protections Affirmed in LSC v. Velazquez Introduction In Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez et al., 531 U.S. 533 (2001), the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical...
Supreme Court Invalidates Missouri's Congressional Term Limits Amendment

Supreme Court Invalidates Missouri's Congressional Term Limits Amendment

Date: Mar 1, 2001
Supreme Court Invalidates Missouri's Congressional Term Limits Amendment Introduction In Cook v. Gralike et al., 531 U.S. 510 (2001), the United States Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality...
Claim Preclusion in Federal Diversity Dismissals: Insights from Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Claim Preclusion in Federal Diversity Dismissals: Insights from Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Date: Feb 28, 2001
Claim Preclusion in Federal Diversity Dismissals: Insights from Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed...
EPA's Authority in Setting Air Quality Standards Affirmed: Cost Consideration Prohibited under CAA §109(b)(1)

EPA's Authority in Setting Air Quality Standards Affirmed: Cost Consideration Prohibited under CAA §109(b)(1)

Date: Feb 28, 2001
Environmental Protection Agency's Authority Affirmed: Prohibition of Cost Consideration in Setting NAAQS Introduction In the landmark case Whitman, Administrator of Environmental Protection Agency,...
Eleventh Amendment Precludes State Liability for ADA Employment Discrimination Damages – Board of Trustees v. Garrett

Eleventh Amendment Precludes State Liability for ADA Employment Discrimination Damages – Board of Trustees v. Garrett

Date: Feb 22, 2001
Eleventh Amendment Precludes State Liability for ADA Employment Discrimination Damages – Board of Trustees v. Garrett Introduction The case of Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v....
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Upholds States Against Private ADA Suits for Money Damages

Eleventh Amendment Immunity Upholds States Against Private ADA Suits for Money Damages

Date: Feb 22, 2001
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Upholds States Against Private ADA Suits for Money Damages Introduction In the landmark case Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama et al. v. Garrett et al., 531...
Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Analyzing Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett

Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Analyzing Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett

Date: Feb 22, 2001
Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Analyzing Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett Introduction In Board of Trustees of the University...
Implied Preemption of State-Law Fraud Claims in Federal Regulatory Framework: Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee

Implied Preemption of State-Law Fraud Claims in Federal Regulatory Framework: Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee

Date: Feb 22, 2001
Implied Preemption of State-Law Fraud Claims in Federal Regulatory Framework: Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee Introduction Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee (531 U.S. 341, 2001)...
State and Federal Jurisdiction in Maritime Injury Claims: An Analysis of Lewis v. Lewis Clark Marine, Inc.

State and Federal Jurisdiction in Maritime Injury Claims: An Analysis of Lewis v. Lewis Clark Marine, Inc.

Date: Feb 22, 2001
State and Federal Jurisdiction in Maritime Injury Claims: An Analysis of Lewis v. Lewis Clark Marine, Inc. Introduction Lewis v. Lewis Clark Marine, Inc. (531 U.S. 438) is a seminal United States...
Reinterpreting Floodwater Immunity: Central Green Co. v. United States

Reinterpreting Floodwater Immunity: Central Green Co. v. United States

Date: Feb 22, 2001
Reinterpreting Floodwater Immunity: Central Green Co. v. United States Introduction Central Green Co. v. United States is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that reshapes the...
State Action Doctrine in Athletic Associations: Insights from BRENTWOOD ACADEMY v. TENNESSEE SECONDARY SCHool Athletic Association

State Action Doctrine in Athletic Associations: Insights from BRENTWOOD ACADEMY v. TENNESSEE SECONDARY SCHool Athletic Association

Date: Feb 21, 2001
State Action Doctrine in Athletic Associations: Insights from BRENTWOOD ACADEMY v. TENNESSEE SECONDARY SCHool Athletic Association Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, BRENTWOOD ACADEMY v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert