Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Denies Reconsideration of Jury Size in RAMIN KHORRAMI v. ARIZONA

Supreme Court Denies Reconsideration of Jury Size in RAMIN KHORRAMI v. ARIZONA

Date: Nov 8, 2022
Supreme Court Denies Reconsideration of Jury Size in RAMIN KHORRAMI v. ARIZONA Introduction In the landmark case Ramin Khorrami v. Arizona (143 S. Ct. 22, 2022), the Supreme Court of the United...
Chevron Deference Under Scrutiny: Revisiting Administrative Law in Buffington v. McDonough

Chevron Deference Under Scrutiny: Revisiting Administrative Law in Buffington v. McDonough

Date: Nov 8, 2022
Chevron Deference Under Scrutiny: Revisiting Administrative Law in Buffington v. McDonough Introduction The case of Thomas H. Buffington v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veteran Affairs presents a...
Prosecutorial Misconduct and Due Process: The Willard Anthony v. Louisiana Judgment

Prosecutorial Misconduct and Due Process: The Willard Anthony v. Louisiana Judgment

Date: Nov 8, 2022
Prosecutorial Misconduct and Due Process: The Willard Anthony v. Louisiana Judgment Introduction The case of Willard Anthony v. Louisiana (143 S. Ct. 29) presents a critical examination of...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Juror Bias in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on Thomas v. Lumpkin

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Juror Bias in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on Thomas v. Lumpkin

Date: Oct 12, 2022
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Juror Bias in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on Thomas v. Lumpkin Introduction Thomas v. Lumpkin (143 S. Ct. 4, 2022) presents a critical examination...
First Amendment Protections for Religious Institutions: Yeshiva University v. YU Pride Alliance

First Amendment Protections for Religious Institutions: Yeshiva University v. YU Pride Alliance

Date: Sep 15, 2022
First Amendment Protections for Religious Institutions: Yeshiva University v. YU Pride Alliance Introduction Yeshiva University, et al. v. YU Pride Alliance, et al. (143 S. Ct. 1, 2022) is a pivotal...
Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Justice Sotomayor's Dissent in Canales v. Lumpkin

Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Justice Sotomayor's Dissent in Canales v. Lumpkin

Date: Jul 1, 2022
Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Justice Sotomayor's Dissent in Canales v. Lumpkin Introduction Canales v. Lumpkin (142 S. Ct. 2563, 2022) is a significant case addressing the...
West Virginia v. EPA: Limiting Agency Authority Under the Major Questions Doctrine

West Virginia v. EPA: Limiting Agency Authority Under the Major Questions Doctrine

Date: Jul 1, 2022
West Virginia v. EPA: Limiting Agency Authority Under the Major Questions Doctrine Introduction In the landmark case West Virginia et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al., decided on June...
Restricting Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Applications: Insights from Storey v. Lumpkin

Restricting Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Applications: Insights from Storey v. Lumpkin

Date: Jul 1, 2022
Restricting Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Applications: Insights from Storey v. Lumpkin Introduction The case of Paul David Storey v. Bobby Lumpkin underscores significant tensions within the...
West Virginia v. EPA: Supreme Court Restricts EPA's Authority to Implement Clean Power Plan

West Virginia v. EPA: Supreme Court Restricts EPA's Authority to Implement Clean Power Plan

Date: Jul 1, 2022
West Virginia v. EPA: Supreme Court Restricts EPA's Authority to Implement Clean Power Plan 1. Introduction West Virginia v. EPA is a landmark Supreme Court decision that significantly curtails the...
Grzegorczyk v. United States: Implications for Grant, Vacate, Remand Practice in Collateral Reviews

Grzegorczyk v. United States: Implications for Grant, Vacate, Remand Practice in Collateral Reviews

Date: Jul 1, 2022
Grzegorczyk v. United States: Implications for Grant, Vacate, Remand Practice in Collateral Reviews Introduction Grzegorczyk v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2580 (2022), presents a significant moment in...
Reevaluating Qualified Immunity in Inmate Suicide Prevention: Insights from PATSY K. COPE v. LESLIE W. COGDILL

Reevaluating Qualified Immunity in Inmate Suicide Prevention: Insights from PATSY K. COPE v. LESLIE W. COGDILL

Date: Jul 1, 2022
Reevaluating Qualified Immunity in Inmate Suicide Prevention: Insights from PATSY K. COPE v. LESLIE W. COGDILL Introduction The case of PATSY K. COPE, ET AL. v. LESLIE W. COGDILL, ET AL. (142 S. Ct....
Supreme Court Affirms Executive Discretion in Immigration Policy: Biden v. Texas

Supreme Court Affirms Executive Discretion in Immigration Policy: Biden v. Texas

Date: Jul 1, 2022
Supreme Court Affirms Executive Discretion in Immigration Policy: Biden v. Texas Introduction Biden v. Texas is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision delivered on June 30, 2022, involving the...
Supreme Court Affirms Executive Discretion in Terminating Migrant Protection Protocols Under the Immigration and Nationality Act

Supreme Court Affirms Executive Discretion in Terminating Migrant Protection Protocols Under the Immigration and Nationality Act

Date: Jul 1, 2022
Supreme Court Affirms Executive Discretion in Terminating Migrant Protection Protocols Under the Immigration and Nationality Act Introduction In the landmark case of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President...
Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed: Federal and State Authority in Indian Country Prosecutions

Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed: Federal and State Authority in Indian Country Prosecutions

Date: Jun 30, 2022
Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed: Federal and State Authority in Indian Country Prosecutions Introduction Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 142 S. Ct. 2486 (2022), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta and Its Implications

Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta and Its Implications

Date: Jun 30, 2022
Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta and Its Implications Introduction Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, decided on June 29, 2022. The...
States Waive Sovereign Immunity for Private USERRA Suits: Torres v. Texas D.O.P.S.

States Waive Sovereign Immunity for Private USERRA Suits: Torres v. Texas D.O.P.S.

Date: Jun 30, 2022
States Waive Sovereign Immunity for Private USERRA Suits: Torres v. Texas D.O.P.S. Introduction Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, delivered...
Supreme Court Establishes Federal Supremacy Over State Sovereign Immunity in USERRA Enforcement

Supreme Court Establishes Federal Supremacy Over State Sovereign Immunity in USERRA Enforcement

Date: Jun 30, 2022
Supreme Court Establishes Federal Supremacy Over State Sovereign Immunity in USERRA Enforcement Introduction In Le Roy Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, the Supreme Court of the United...
Expanded Discretion Under the First Step Act: Allowing Consideration of Intervening Changes in Sentence Reduction

Expanded Discretion Under the First Step Act: Allowing Consideration of Intervening Changes in Sentence Reduction

Date: Jun 28, 2022
Expanded Discretion Under the First Step Act: Allowing Consideration of Intervening Changes in Sentence Reduction Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States, in Carlos Concepcion v. United...
Enhanced Mens Rea Requirements in Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Xiulu Ruan v. United States

Enhanced Mens Rea Requirements in Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Xiulu Ruan v. United States

Date: Jun 28, 2022
Enhanced Mens Rea Requirements in Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Xiulu Ruan v. United States Introduction Case: Xiulu Ruan v. United States Court: United States Supreme Court Date: June 27,...
Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Mens Rea Requirement for Authorization Exceptions under the Controlled Substances Act

Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Mens Rea Requirement for Authorization Exceptions under the Controlled Substances Act

Date: Jun 28, 2022
Enhanced Mens Rea Requirement for Authorization Exceptions under the Controlled Substances Act Introduction In the landmark decision of Xiulu Ruan and Shakeel Kahn v. United States, the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert