Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Sovereign Immunity and Bankruptcy Proceedings: Central Virginia Community College v. Katz Introduction Central Virginia Community College et al. v. Katz, Liquidating Supervisor for Wallace's...
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. ConAgra: Reinforcement of Rule 50's Procedural Requirements for Sufficiency of Evidence Challenges Introduction In Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. SwiftekRich, Inc., DBA...
Limiting Collateral Appeal: Will v. Hallock Establishes Boundaries on the Federal Tort Claims Act's Judgment Bar Introduction Will et al. v. Hallock et al., decided by the United States Supreme Court...
Affirmation of State Court Deference in Batson Challenges: Insights from Rice v. Collins Introduction Rice, Warden, et al. v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333 (2006), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Judicial Remedies in Abortion Legislation: Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Introduction The Supreme Court case Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, 546 U.S. 320...
WACHOVIA BANK v. SCHMIDT: Defining National Bank Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Schmidt et al. is a landmark 2006 Supreme Court case that...
Gonzales v. Oregon: Federalism and the Boundaries of the Controlled Substances Act in Physician-Assisted Suicide Introduction Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), is a landmark decision by the...
Sanders v. California: Redefining the Impact of Invalid Sentencing Factors on Death Penalty Sentences Introduction Sanders v. California (546 U.S. 212, 2006) is a landmark decision by the United...
Limitation on Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act: Insights from Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc. Introduction Volvo Trucks North America, Inc....
Reinterpreting Timeliness Standards for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA: The Supreme Court in Evans v. Chavis Introduction Evans, Acting Warden v. Chavis, 546 U.S. 189 (2006), is a...
Title II of the ADA Upholds Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity for Fourteenth Amendment Violations Introduction United States v. Georgia et al., 546 U.S. 151 (2006), is a landmark decision by the...
Supreme Court Upholds Offset of Social Security Benefits for Overdue Student Loans in Lockhart v. United States Introduction Lockhart v. United States, 546 U.S. 142 (2005), is a landmark decision by...
Attorney's Fees in Removal Proceedings: Reasonableness Standard under §1447(c) Established in MARTIN v. FRANKLIN CAPITAL CORP. Introduction Martin et ux. v. Franklin Capital Corp. et al. (546 U.S....
Kansas Fuel Tax and Tribal Sovereignty: Insights from Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Wagnon, Secretary, Kansas Department of Revenue v. Prairie...
Complete Diversity Affirmed in Removal Jurisdiction: Lincoln Property Co. v. Roche et ux. Introduction Lincoln Property Co. et al. v. Roche et ux. is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision...
Supreme Court Upholds Transferred Intent Doctrine in Ohio Aggravated Murder Cases Introduction Bradshaw v. Richey, 546 U.S. 74 (2005), represents a pivotal decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Burden of Persuasion in IDEA Hearings: Schaffer v. Weast Introduction Schaffer, a Minor, by His Parents and Next Friends, Schaffer et vir, et al. v. Weast, Superintendent, Montgomery County Public...
United States v. Olson et al. (546 U.S. 43): Clarifying Sovereign Immunity under the Federal Tort Claims Act Introduction United States v. Olson et al. is a landmark decision delivered by the United...
IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez: Clarifying Compensation for Walking Time under the FLSA Introduction IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, rendered on November 8,...
Eberhart v. United States: Reclassifying Rule 33 Time Limits as Claim-Processing Rules Introduction Eberhart v. United States, 546 U.S. 12 (2006), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that redefined...