Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Affirming Plaintiff Must Hold Contractual Rights for § 1981 Claims: Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald

Affirming Plaintiff Must Hold Contractual Rights for § 1981 Claims: Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald

Date: Feb 23, 2006
Affirming Plaintiff Must Hold Contractual Rights for § 1981 Claims: Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald Introduction Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald (546 U.S. 470, 2006) is a landmark decision by the...
Dolan v. United States Postal Service: Redefining the Scope of the Postal Exception under the FTCA

Dolan v. United States Postal Service: Redefining the Scope of the Postal Exception under the FTCA

Date: Feb 23, 2006
Dolan v. United States Postal Service: Redefining the Scope of the Postal Exception under the FTCA Court: United States Supreme Court Date: February 22, 2006 Introduction Dolan v. United States...
Arbaugh v. YH Corp.: Federal Jurisdiction and Employee Numerosity Under Title VII

Arbaugh v. YH Corp.: Federal Jurisdiction and Employee Numerosity Under Title VII

Date: Feb 23, 2006
Arbaugh v. YH Corp.: Federal Jurisdiction and Employee Numerosity Under Title VII Introduction Arbaugh v. YH Corp., DBA The Moonlight Cafe (546 U.S. 500, 2006) represents a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court...
Limits on Innocence-Related Evidence in Death Penalty Sentencing: Oregon v. Guzek

Limits on Innocence-Related Evidence in Death Penalty Sentencing: Oregon v. Guzek

Date: Feb 23, 2006
Limits on Innocence-Related Evidence in Death Penalty Sentencing: Oregon v. Guzek Introduction Oregon v. Guzek, 546 U.S. 517 (2006), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Lance v. Dennis

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Lance v. Dennis

Date: Feb 22, 2006
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Lance v. Dennis Introduction Lance et al. v. Dennis, Colorado Secretary of State (546 U.S. 459, 2006) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that addresses...
Severability of Arbitration Agreements in Contract Challenges: Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna

Severability of Arbitration Agreements in Contract Challenges: Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna

Date: Feb 22, 2006
Severability of Arbitration Agreements in Contract Challenges: Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna Introduction Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (2006), is a landmark...
Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal: Expanding Religious Freedom under RFRA

Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal: Expanding Religious Freedom under RFRA

Date: Feb 22, 2006
Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal: Expanding Religious Freedom under RFRA Introduction Gonzales, Attorney General, Et Al. v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal is...
Sovereign Immunity and Bankruptcy Proceedings: Central Virginia Community College v. Katz

Sovereign Immunity and Bankruptcy Proceedings: Central Virginia Community College v. Katz

Date: Jan 24, 2006
Sovereign Immunity and Bankruptcy Proceedings: Central Virginia Community College v. Katz Introduction Central Virginia Community College et al. v. Katz, Liquidating Supervisor for Wallace's...
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. ConAgra: Reinforcement of Rule 50's Procedural Requirements for Sufficiency of Evidence Challenges

Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. ConAgra: Reinforcement of Rule 50's Procedural Requirements for Sufficiency of Evidence Challenges

Date: Jan 24, 2006
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. ConAgra: Reinforcement of Rule 50's Procedural Requirements for Sufficiency of Evidence Challenges Introduction In Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. SwiftekRich, Inc., DBA...
Limiting Collateral Appeal: Will v. Hallock Establishes Boundaries on the Federal Tort Claims Act's Judgment Bar

Limiting Collateral Appeal: Will v. Hallock Establishes Boundaries on the Federal Tort Claims Act's Judgment Bar

Date: Jan 19, 2006
Limiting Collateral Appeal: Will v. Hallock Establishes Boundaries on the Federal Tort Claims Act's Judgment Bar Introduction Will et al. v. Hallock et al., decided by the United States Supreme Court...
Affirmation of State Court Deference in Batson Challenges: Insights from Rice v. Collins

Affirmation of State Court Deference in Batson Challenges: Insights from Rice v. Collins

Date: Jan 19, 2006
Affirmation of State Court Deference in Batson Challenges: Insights from Rice v. Collins Introduction Rice, Warden, et al. v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333 (2006), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Judicial Remedies in Abortion Legislation: Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England

Judicial Remedies in Abortion Legislation: Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England

Date: Jan 19, 2006
Judicial Remedies in Abortion Legislation: Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Introduction The Supreme Court case Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, 546 U.S. 320...
WACHOVIA BANK v. SCHMIDT: Defining National Bank Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction

WACHOVIA BANK v. SCHMIDT: Defining National Bank Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Jan 18, 2006
WACHOVIA BANK v. SCHMIDT: Defining National Bank Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Schmidt et al. is a landmark 2006 Supreme Court case that...
Gonzales v. Oregon: Federalism and the Boundaries of the Controlled Substances Act in Physician-Assisted Suicide

Gonzales v. Oregon: Federalism and the Boundaries of the Controlled Substances Act in Physician-Assisted Suicide

Date: Jan 18, 2006
Gonzales v. Oregon: Federalism and the Boundaries of the Controlled Substances Act in Physician-Assisted Suicide Introduction Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), is a landmark decision by the...
Sanders v. California: Redefining the Impact of Invalid Sentencing Factors on Death Penalty Sentences

Sanders v. California: Redefining the Impact of Invalid Sentencing Factors on Death Penalty Sentences

Date: Jan 12, 2006
Sanders v. California: Redefining the Impact of Invalid Sentencing Factors on Death Penalty Sentences Introduction Sanders v. California (546 U.S. 212, 2006) is a landmark decision by the United...
Limitation on Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act: Insights from Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.

Limitation on Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act: Insights from Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Limitation on Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act: Insights from Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc. Introduction Volvo Trucks North America, Inc....
Reinterpreting Timeliness Standards for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA: The Supreme Court in Evans v. Chavis

Reinterpreting Timeliness Standards for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA: The Supreme Court in Evans v. Chavis

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Reinterpreting Timeliness Standards for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA: The Supreme Court in Evans v. Chavis Introduction Evans, Acting Warden v. Chavis, 546 U.S. 189 (2006), is a...
Title II of the ADA Upholds Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity for Fourteenth Amendment Violations

Title II of the ADA Upholds Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity for Fourteenth Amendment Violations

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Title II of the ADA Upholds Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity for Fourteenth Amendment Violations Introduction United States v. Georgia et al., 546 U.S. 151 (2006), is a landmark decision by the...
Supreme Court Upholds Offset of Social Security Benefits for Overdue Student Loans in Lockhart v. United States

Supreme Court Upholds Offset of Social Security Benefits for Overdue Student Loans in Lockhart v. United States

Date: Dec 8, 2005
Supreme Court Upholds Offset of Social Security Benefits for Overdue Student Loans in Lockhart v. United States Introduction Lockhart v. United States, 546 U.S. 142 (2005), is a landmark decision by...
Attorney's Fees in Removal Proceedings: Reasonableness Standard under §1447(c) Established in Martin v. Franklin

Attorney's Fees in Removal Proceedings: Reasonableness Standard under §1447(c) Established in Martin v. Franklin

Date: Dec 8, 2005
Attorney's Fees in Removal Proceedings: Reasonableness Standard under §1447(c) Established in MARTIN v. FRANKLIN CAPITAL CORP. Introduction Martin et ux. v. Franklin Capital Corp. et al. (546 U.S....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert