Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Gulf Land Company v. Atlantic Refining Co. (134 Tex. 59) - Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Oil and Gas Regulations

Gulf Land Company v. Atlantic Refining Co. (134 Tex. 59) - Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Oil and Gas Regulations

Date: Jul 27, 1939
Gulf Land Company v. Atlantic Refining Co. (134 Tex. 59) - Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Oil and Gas Regulations Introduction The case of Gulf Land Company et al. v. Atlantic Refining Co....
Refining Venue Requirements in Libel Actions: Analyzing A. H. Belo Corporation v. Blanton

Refining Venue Requirements in Libel Actions: Analyzing A. H. Belo Corporation v. Blanton

Date: Jun 22, 1939
Refining Venue Requirements in Libel Actions: Analyzing A. H. Belo Corporation v. Thomas L. Blanton Introduction The case of A. H. Belo Corporation v. Thomas L. Blanton (133 Tex. 391) adjudicated by...
Texas National Guard Armory Board v. McCraw: Upholding Legislative Delegation and Financial Autonomy

Texas National Guard Armory Board v. McCraw: Upholding Legislative Delegation and Financial Autonomy

Date: Mar 30, 1939
Texas National Guard Armory Board v. McCraw: Upholding Legislative Delegation and Financial Autonomy Introduction Texas National Guard Armory Board v. William McCraw, Attorney General (132 Tex. 613)...
Establishing Proximate Cause in Negligence: The Carey v. Pure Distributing Corp. Decision

Establishing Proximate Cause in Negligence: The Carey v. Pure Distributing Corp. Decision

Date: Feb 16, 1939
Establishing Proximate Cause in Negligence: The Carey v. Pure Distributing Corp. Decision Introduction The case of Walter Carey v. Pure Distributing Corporation et al., adjudicated by the Supreme...
Adverse Possession and Procedural Safeguards in Property Litigation: Ramirez v. Acker et al.

Adverse Possession and Procedural Safeguards in Property Litigation: Ramirez v. Acker et al.

Date: Feb 3, 1939
Adverse Possession and Procedural Safeguards in Property Litigation: Ramirez v. Acker et al. (124 S.W.2d 905) Introduction Ramirez v. Acker et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Court of Civil...
Jurisdiction and Necessary Parties in Texas Divorce Contempt Proceedings: Ex Parte Scott

Jurisdiction and Necessary Parties in Texas Divorce Contempt Proceedings: Ex Parte Scott

Date: Jan 5, 1939
Jurisdiction and Necessary Parties in Texas Divorce Contempt Proceedings: Ex Parte Scott Introduction EX PARTE WINFIELD SCOTT, Jr. v. Jessica Patterson Scott is a landmark 1939 decision by the...
Fiduciary Duty of Full Disclosure in Partnership Transactions: Texas Supreme Court's Ruling in Johnson v. Peckham

Fiduciary Duty of Full Disclosure in Partnership Transactions: Texas Supreme Court's Ruling in Johnson v. Peckham

Date: Nov 10, 1938
Fiduciary Duty of Full Disclosure in Partnership Transactions: Texas Supreme Court's Ruling in Johnson v. Peckham Introduction The case of F. T. Johnson v. W. H. Peckham, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Certainty and Established Business in Recovering Lost Profits: Southwest Battery Corp. v. C.E. Owen et al.

Certainty and Established Business in Recovering Lost Profits: Southwest Battery Corp. v. C.E. Owen et al.

Date: May 5, 1938
Certainty and Established Business in Recovering Lost Profits Southwest Battery Corporation v. C.E. Owen et al. (131 Tex. 423, 1938) Introduction Southwest Battery Corporation v. C.E. Owen et al. is...
Defining Limits of Constructive Adverse Possession in Texas: Analysis of Simonds v. Stanolind Oil Gas Company

Defining Limits of Constructive Adverse Possession in Texas: Analysis of Simonds v. Stanolind Oil Gas Company

Date: Mar 17, 1938
Defining Limits of Constructive Adverse Possession in Texas: Analysis of Simonds v. Stanolind Oil Gas Company Introduction The landmark case of Junius SIMONDS et al. v. STANOLIND OIL Gas Company et...
Finality of Railroad Commission Orders: Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas

Finality of Railroad Commission Orders: Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas

Date: Jul 23, 1936
Finality of Railroad Commission Orders: Magnolia Petroleum Company et al. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al. (128 Tex. 189) Introduction Magnolia Petroleum Company et al. v. Railroad Commission...
Reformulation of Venue Requirements in Multi-Defendant Suits: Stockyards National Bank v. W. I. Maples

Reformulation of Venue Requirements in Multi-Defendant Suits: Stockyards National Bank v. W. I. Maples

Date: Jul 16, 1936
Reformulation of Venue Requirements in Multi-Defendant Suits: Stockyards National Bank v. W. I. Maples Introduction The case of Stockyards National Bank v. W. I. Maples (127 Tex. 633), adjudicated by...
Silvers v. Welch: Establishing Dual Homestead Prohibition and Reinstatement Standards

Silvers v. Welch: Establishing Dual Homestead Prohibition and Reinstatement Standards

Date: Mar 12, 1936
Silvers v. Welch: Establishing Dual Homestead Prohibition and Reinstatement Standards Introduction Rosa Silvers et al. v. L. B. Welch is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Establishing Tenant-at-Will Status Post-Foreclosure: Scott v. Hewitt (1936)

Establishing Tenant-at-Will Status Post-Foreclosure: Scott v. Hewitt (1936)

Date: Feb 6, 1936
Establishing Tenant-at-Will Status Post-Foreclosure: Scott v. Hewitt (1936) Introduction The case of W. P. Scott et ux. v. George W. Hewitt, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas in 1936,...
Comprehensive Commentary on THE STATE OF TEXAS v. R. B. CARPENTER ET AL. (126 Tex. 604)

Comprehensive Commentary on THE STATE OF TEXAS v. R. B. CARPENTER ET AL. (126 Tex. 604)

Date: Jan 9, 1936
Establishing Clear Guidelines for Eminent Domain Compensation: Insights from THE STATE OF TEXAS v. R. B. CARPENTER ET AL. Introduction The State of Texas v. R. B. Carpenter et al., 126 Tex. 604...
Burden of Proof in Venue Exceptions: COMPTON v. ELLIOTT

Burden of Proof in Venue Exceptions: COMPTON v. ELLIOTT

Date: Nov 21, 1935
Burden of Proof in Venue Exceptions: COMPTON v. ELLIOTT Introduction COMPTON v. ELLIOTT is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Texas, adjudicated on November 20, 1935. The case revolves...
One Satisfaction Rule Applied in Joint Tortious Conduct: Wesley Bradshaw v. Baylor University et al. (126 Tex. 99)

One Satisfaction Rule Applied in Joint Tortious Conduct: Wesley Bradshaw v. Baylor University et al. (126 Tex. 99)

Date: Jul 18, 1935
One Satisfaction Rule Applied in Joint Tortious Conduct: Wesley Bradshaw v. Baylor University et al. (126 Tex. 99) Introduction The case of Wesley Bradshaw v. Baylor University et al. adjudicated by...
Railroad Commission’s Authority to Regulate Oil Well Spacing: Balancing Property Rights and Conservation

Railroad Commission’s Authority to Regulate Oil Well Spacing: Balancing Property Rights and Conservation

Date: Jun 13, 1935
Railroad Commission’s Authority to Regulate Oil Well Spacing: Balancing Property Rights and Conservation Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas, in the landmark 1935 decision of C. H. Brown et al....
Affirming the Doctrine of Election and Reimbursement in Homestead Property: Mary A. Dakan v. C. B. Dakan et al.

Affirming the Doctrine of Election and Reimbursement in Homestead Property: Mary A. Dakan v. C. B. Dakan et al.

Date: May 23, 1935
Affirming the Doctrine of Election and Reimbursement in Homestead Property: Mary A. Dakan v. C. B. Dakan et al. Introduction Mary A. Dakan v. C. B. Dakan et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Texas...
Walker v. Temple Trust Company (1935): Affirming Non-Usurious Loan Through Comprehensive Contractual Interpretation

Walker v. Temple Trust Company (1935): Affirming Non-Usurious Loan Through Comprehensive Contractual Interpretation

Date: Mar 28, 1935
Walker v. Temple Trust Company (1935): Affirming Non-Usurious Loan Through Comprehensive Contractual Interpretation Introduction In the landmark case of M. L. Walker et al. v. Temple Trust Company,...
Legitimizing Zoning Ordinances: Analysis of V. A. Lombardo v. City of Dallas (124 Tex. 1, 1934)

Legitimizing Zoning Ordinances: Analysis of V. A. Lombardo v. City of Dallas (124 Tex. 1, 1934)

Date: Jul 1, 1934
Legitimizing Zoning Ordinances: Analysis of V. A. Lombardo v. City of Dallas (124 Tex. 1, 1934) Introduction The case of V. A. Lombardo v. City of Dallas (124 Tex. 1, 1934) presents a pivotal moment...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert