Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Estoppel as a Remedy for Indefinite Contracts: A New Precedent in Texas Contract Law from Wheeler v. White

Estoppel as a Remedy for Indefinite Contracts: A New Precedent in Texas Contract Law from Wheeler v. White

Date: Feb 3, 1966
Estoppel as a Remedy for Indefinite Contracts: A New Precedent in Texas Contract Law from Wheeler v. White Introduction Ellis D. Wheeler v. S.E. White, decided by the Supreme Court of Texas in 1966,...
DuPuy v. City of Waco: Reinforcing Property Rights in Public Infrastructure Projects

DuPuy v. City of Waco: Reinforcing Property Rights in Public Infrastructure Projects

Date: Dec 16, 1965
DuPuy v. City of Waco: Reinforcing Property Rights in Public Infrastructure Projects Introduction The case of Leslie C. DuPUY, Jr., Petitioner, v. The CITY OF WACO, Respondent (396 S.W.2d 103) was...
Declaratory Judgments and Jurisdictional Limits in UNITED SERVICES LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. DELANEY

Declaratory Judgments and Jurisdictional Limits in UNITED SERVICES LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. DELANEY

Date: Dec 2, 1965
Declaratory Judgments and Jurisdictional Limits in UNITED SERVICES LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. DELANEY Introduction United Services Life Insurance Company v. Joan Flores Delaney is a landmark case...
Burden of Tracing in Community Property Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of A. H. Tarver et al. v. Arline S. Tarver

Burden of Tracing in Community Property Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of A. H. Tarver et al. v. Arline S. Tarver

Date: Nov 11, 1965
Burden of Tracing in Community Property Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of A. H. Tarver et al. v. Arline S. Tarver Introduction In the landmark case of A. H. Tarver et al. v. Arline S. Tarver,...
Due Process in License Revocation: HOUSE OF TOBACCO, INC. v. CALVERT

Due Process in License Revocation: HOUSE OF TOBACCO, INC. v. CALVERT

Date: Oct 7, 1965
Due Process in License Revocation: HOUSE OF TOBACCO, INC. v. CALVERT Introduction House of Tobacco, Inc. v. Robert S. Calvert is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on October...
Enhancing Parental Rights in Adoption Proceedings: Gunn v. Cavanaugh

Enhancing Parental Rights in Adoption Proceedings: Gunn v. Cavanaugh

Date: Jul 8, 1965
Enhancing Parental Rights in Adoption Proceedings: Gunn v. Cavanaugh Introduction Gunn v. Cavanaugh (391 S.W.2d 723, Supreme Court of Texas, 1965) is a landmark case addressing the procedural...
Affirmation of Strict Scrutiny in Attorney-Client Fee Agreements: Archer v. Griffith

Affirmation of Strict Scrutiny in Attorney-Client Fee Agreements: Archer v. Griffith

Date: May 20, 1965
Affirmation of Strict Scrutiny in Attorney-Client Fee Agreements: Archer v. Griffith Introduction Fancher Archer v. Nova Dean Griffith is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Rule 267 Application in Johnson v. Southwestern Bell: Defining Judicial Discretion in Witness Sequestration

Rule 267 Application in Johnson v. Southwestern Bell: Defining Judicial Discretion in Witness Sequestration

Date: Apr 29, 1965
Rule 267 Application in Johnson v. Southwestern Bell: Defining Judicial Discretion in Witness Sequestration Introduction In the landmark case of SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY and James Cozart...
PORTER v. WILSON: Clarifying the Role of Quitclaim Deeds in Adverse Possession Claims under Texas Law

PORTER v. WILSON: Clarifying the Role of Quitclaim Deeds in Adverse Possession Claims under Texas Law

Date: Apr 8, 1965
PORTER v. WILSON: Clarifying the Role of Quitclaim Deeds in Adverse Possession Claims under Texas Law Introduction In the landmark case of Thomas W. Porter v. Frank P. Wilson, Sr., et ux., decided by...
Reaffirming the Duty to Defend under Omnibus Clauses: Insights from Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.

Reaffirming the Duty to Defend under Omnibus Clauses: Insights from Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.

Date: Mar 11, 1965
Reaffirming the Duty to Defend under Omnibus Clauses: Insights from Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Heyden Newport Chemical Corporation et al....
Insurance Policy Interpretation: Royal Indemnity Co. v. Bob Marshall, Jr. Establishes Limits on Coverage for Unnamed Locations

Insurance Policy Interpretation: Royal Indemnity Co. v. Bob Marshall, Jr. Establishes Limits on Coverage for Unnamed Locations

Date: Mar 11, 1965
Insurance Policy Interpretation: Royal Indemnity Co. v. Bob Marshall, Jr. Establishes Limits on Coverage for Unnamed Locations Introduction The case of Royal Indemnity Company v. Bob Marshall, Jr.,...
Clarifying Standards for Bill of Review and Setting Aside Default Judgments: Hanks v. Rosser

Clarifying Standards for Bill of Review and Setting Aside Default Judgments: Hanks v. Rosser

Date: Apr 23, 1964
Clarifying Standards for Bill of Review and Setting Aside Default Judgments: Hanks v. Rosser Introduction Hanks v. Rosser, 378 S.W.2d 31 (1964), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas, addresses...
Establishing Residency Requirements for Political Candidates: Insights from J. Alton Mills v. Robert Franklin Bartlett

Establishing Residency Requirements for Political Candidates: Insights from J. Alton Mills v. Robert Franklin Bartlett

Date: Apr 9, 1964
Establishing Residency Requirements for Political Candidates: Insights from J. Alton Mills v. Robert Franklin Bartlett Introduction The case of J. Alton Mills v. Robert Franklin Bartlett, decided by...
Stare Decisis in Property Title Disputes: Analysis of Swilley v. McCain

Stare Decisis in Property Title Disputes: Analysis of Swilley v. McCain

Date: Feb 20, 1964
Stare Decisis in Property Title Disputes: Analysis of Swilley v. McCain. Introduction The landmark case of W. S. Swilley et al. v. Mrs. Norah McCain et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Roman Hernandez v. Heldenfels: Establishing Contractors' Duty of Care to Property Owner’s Employees as Invitees

Roman Hernandez v. Heldenfels: Establishing Contractors' Duty of Care to Property Owner’s Employees as Invitees

Date: Jan 9, 1964
Roman Hernandez v. Heldenfels: Establishing Contractors' Duty of Care to Property Owner’s Employees as Invitees Introduction The case of Roman Hernandez v. F. W. Heldenfels et al. (374 S.W.2d 196)...
Halepeska v. Callihan Interests: Establishing Duty and Volenti Non Fit Injuria in Texas Law

Halepeska v. Callihan Interests: Establishing Duty and Volenti Non Fit Injuria in Texas Law

Date: Oct 10, 1963
Halepeska v. Callihan Interests: Establishing Duty and Volenti Non Fit Injuria in Texas Law Introduction The case of Natalie K. Halepeska et al. v. Callihan Interests, Inc., adjudicated by the...
Reversal of Will Validity Due to Insufficient Evidence of Undue Influence in Rothermel v. Duncan

Reversal of Will Validity Due to Insufficient Evidence of Undue Influence in Rothermel v. Duncan

Date: Aug 1, 1963
Reversal of Will Validity Due to Insufficient Evidence of Undue Influence in Rothermel v. Duncan Introduction The case of Louis F. Rothermel, Individually and as Independent Executor, Petitioner, v....
Admission of Prior Injuries in Workmen's Compensation Cases: Hartford v. McCardell

Admission of Prior Injuries in Workmen's Compensation Cases: Hartford v. McCardell

Date: Aug 1, 1963
Admission of Prior Injuries in Workmen's Compensation Cases: Hartford v. McCardell Introduction In the landmark case Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. George McCardell, 369 S.W.2d 331 (Tex....
Texas Supreme Court Affirms Mandamus Authority Over Banking Commissioner and Restricts De Novo Review of Bank Charter Decisions

Texas Supreme Court Affirms Mandamus Authority Over Banking Commissioner and Restricts De Novo Review of Bank Charter Decisions

Date: Jul 25, 1963
Texas Supreme Court Affirms Mandamus Authority Over Banking Commissioner and Restricts De Novo Review of Bank Charter Decisions Introduction The case of Chemical Bank Trust Company v. Honorable J. M....
Private Dedication and Implied Easements for Recreational Use Rejected: Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch

Private Dedication and Implied Easements for Recreational Use Rejected: Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch

Date: Nov 22, 1962
Private Dedication and Implied Easements for Recreational Use Rejected: Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch Introduction Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch, 364 S.W.2d 196 (Tex. 1962), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert