Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Sufficiency of Land Description in Contracts: Morrow v. Shotwell

Sufficiency of Land Description in Contracts: Morrow v. Shotwell

Date: Apr 6, 1972
Sufficiency of Land Description in Contracts: Morrow v. Shotwell Introduction The case of John A. Morrow v. E. F. Shotwell (477 S.W.2d 538) presents a pivotal examination of the requirements for land...
Establishing Unauthorized Dominion: Conversion in Property Management Cases - Lack's Stores v. Waisath

Establishing Unauthorized Dominion: Conversion in Property Management Cases - Lack's Stores v. Waisath

Date: Dec 16, 1971
Establishing Unauthorized Dominion: Conversion in Property Management Cases - LACK'S STORES, INC. v. WAISATH Introduction The case of Wilfred Waisath et ux. v. Lack's Stores, Inc. (474 S.W.2d 444)...
Res Judicata Affirmed in GRAVIS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES: Implications for Product Liability Claims

Res Judicata Affirmed in GRAVIS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES: Implications for Product Liability Claims

Date: Oct 7, 1971
Res Judicata Affirmed in GRAVIS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES: Implications for Product Liability Claims Introduction GRAVIS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Texas Supreme Court Establishes Equitable Relief for Mutual Mistakes in Homestead Property Deeds

Texas Supreme Court Establishes Equitable Relief for Mutual Mistakes in Homestead Property Deeds

Date: Jul 29, 1971
Texas Supreme Court Establishes Equitable Relief for Mutual Mistakes in Homestead Property Deeds Introduction The case of O. H. Sullivan et ux. v. Pearl Barnett et al. adjudicated by the Supreme...
Scope of Employment and Employer Liability: Insights from Robertson Tank Lines, Inc. v. Van Cleave

Scope of Employment and Employer Liability: Insights from Robertson Tank Lines, Inc. v. Van Cleave

Date: Jul 15, 1971
Scope of Employment and Employer Liability: Insights from Robertson Tank Lines, Inc. v. Van Cleave Introduction Robertson Tank Lines, Inc., Petitioner, v. Johnnie Van Cleave et al., Respondents, 468...
Clerical vs. Judicial Errors in Nunc Pro Tunc Judgments: Analysis of Lone Star Cement Corp. v. Fair

Clerical vs. Judicial Errors in Nunc Pro Tunc Judgments: Analysis of Lone Star Cement Corp. v. Fair

Date: Jun 3, 1971
Clerical vs. Judicial Errors in Nunc Pro Tunc Judgments: Analysis of Lone Star Cement Corp. v. Fair Introduction Lone Star Cement Corporation v. Fair is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Releasing Named Tort-Feasors Only: Texas Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in MCMILLEN v. KLINGENSMITH

Releasing Named Tort-Feasors Only: Texas Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in MCMILLEN v. KLINGENSMITH

Date: May 13, 1971
Releasing Named Tort-Feasors Only: Texas Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in MCMILLEN v. KLINGENSMITH Introduction The case of Kenneth D. McMILLEN et ux. v. Dr. William KLINGENSMITH et al. (467...
Coverage of Building Damage by Burglars under Vandalism and Malicious Mischief Endorsement: U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron and Metal Corp.

Coverage of Building Damage by Burglars under Vandalism and Malicious Mischief Endorsement: U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron and Metal Corp.

Date: Apr 1, 1971
Coverage of Building Damage by Burglars under Vandalism and Malicious Mischief Endorsement: U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron and Metal Corp. Introduction In the landmark case of United...
Hidalgo v. Surety Savings: Clarifying the Role of Pleadings in Summary Judgment

Hidalgo v. Surety Savings: Clarifying the Role of Pleadings in Summary Judgment

Date: Feb 4, 1971
Hidalgo v. Surety Savings: Clarifying the Role of Pleadings in Summary Judgment Introduction The case of Carolina E. Hidalgo, a femme sole, versus Surety Savings and Loan Association, a corporation,...
Texas Supreme Court Establishes Exception to Rule 683 in Public Nuisance Injunctions

Texas Supreme Court Establishes Exception to Rule 683 in Public Nuisance Injunctions

Date: Jan 14, 1971
Texas Supreme Court Establishes Exception to Rule 683 in Public Nuisance Injunctions Introduction The case of The State of Texas v. Cook United, Inc. et al., decided on January 13, 1971, by the...
Admissibility of Prior Convictions: Landry v. Travelers Insurance Co. (1970)

Admissibility of Prior Convictions: Landry v. Travelers Insurance Co. (1970)

Date: Oct 8, 1970
Admissibility of Prior Convictions: Landry v. Travelers Insurance Co. (1970) Introduction Robert Landry Jr., Petitioner, v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Respondent (458 S.W.2d 649) is a pivotal...
Community Property and Military Disability Retirement Benefits: Analysis of BUSBY v. BUSBY

Community Property and Military Disability Retirement Benefits: Analysis of BUSBY v. BUSBY

Date: Jul 30, 1970
Community Property and Military Disability Retirement Benefits: Analysis of BUSBY v. BUSBY Introduction BUSBY v. BUSBY is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on July 29, 1970. This...
Restricting Civil Remedies in Penal Statute Enforcement: Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corporation

Restricting Civil Remedies in Penal Statute Enforcement: Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corporation

Date: Jul 30, 1970
Restricting Civil Remedies in Penal Statute Enforcement: Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek...
Reaffirming the Standard of Causation in Medical Malpractice: LENGER v. PHYSICIAN'S GENERAL Hospital, Inc.

Reaffirming the Standard of Causation in Medical Malpractice: LENGER v. PHYSICIAN'S GENERAL Hospital, Inc.

Date: Jun 11, 1970
Reaffirming the Standard of Causation in Medical Malpractice: LENGER v. PHYSICIAN'S GENERAL Hospital, Inc. Introduction Dennis H. LENGER v. PHYSICIAN'S GENERAL Hospital, Inc. is a pivotal case...
Clarifying the Claim of Right in Adverse Possession: BUTLER v. HANSON

Clarifying the Claim of Right in Adverse Possession: BUTLER v. HANSON

Date: Jun 11, 1970
Clarifying the Claim of Right in Adverse Possession: BUTLER v. HANSON Introduction BUTLER v. HANSON, 455 S.W.2d 942 (Tex. 1970), is a pivotal case in Texas property law that delves into the...
Enforceability of Regulatory Standards in Barber Education: TEXAS STATE BOARD OF BARBER EXAMINERS v. BEAUMONT BARBER COLLEGE

Enforceability of Regulatory Standards in Barber Education: TEXAS STATE BOARD OF BARBER EXAMINERS v. BEAUMONT BARBER COLLEGE

Date: May 28, 1970
Enforceability of Regulatory Standards in Barber Education: TEXAS STATE BOARD OF BARBER EXAMINERS v. BEAUMONT BARBER COLLEGE Introduction The case of TEXAS STATE BOARD OF BARBER EXAMINERS et al. v....
Duty of Care in Premises Liability: Insights from SEIDENECK v. CAL BAYREUTHER ASSOCIATES

Duty of Care in Premises Liability: Insights from SEIDENECK v. CAL BAYREUTHER ASSOCIATES

Date: Apr 16, 1970
Duty of Care in Premises Liability: Insights from SEIDENECK v. CAL BAYREUTHER ASSOCIATES Introduction The case of Seideneck et ux. v. Cal Bayreuther Associates et al. (451 S.W.2d 752) adjudicated by...
Mandamus Validates Judicial Rendition Requirements: Analysis of Comet Aluminum Company, Inc. v. Dibrell

Mandamus Validates Judicial Rendition Requirements: Analysis of Comet Aluminum Company, Inc. v. Dibrell

Date: Feb 19, 1970
Mandamus Validates Judicial Rendition Requirements: Analysis of Comet Aluminum Company, Inc. v. Dibrell Introduction Comet Aluminum Company, Inc. v. Honorable Joe B. Dibrell et al. is a pivotal case...
Zoning Ordinances Must Be Amended by Ordinance, Not Resolution: City of Hutchins v. Prasifka

Zoning Ordinances Must Be Amended by Ordinance, Not Resolution: City of Hutchins v. Prasifka

Date: Feb 19, 1970
Zoning Ordinances Must Be Amended by Ordinance, Not Resolution: City of Hutchins v. Prasifka Introduction City of Hutchins, Texas versus Frank J. Prasifka et al. is a landmark case decided by the...
Accord and Satisfaction Principles in Subcontractor Contracts: An Analysis of Lenox JENKINS v. HENRY C. BECK COmpany

Accord and Satisfaction Principles in Subcontractor Contracts: An Analysis of Lenox JENKINS v. HENRY C. BECK COmpany

Date: Jan 29, 1970
Accord and Satisfaction Principles in Subcontractor Contracts: An Analysis of Lenox JENKINS v. HENRY C. BECK COmpany Introduction The legal doctrine of accord and satisfaction serves as a critical...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert