Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Affirming Fiduciary Duties of Executive Rights Holders in Mineral Estates – MANGES v. GUERRA

Affirming Fiduciary Duties of Executive Rights Holders in Mineral Estates – MANGES v. GUERRA

Date: Jul 12, 1984
Affirming Fiduciary Duties of Executive Rights Holders in Mineral Estates – MANGES v. GUERRA Introduction The case of Clinton Manges, Petitioner, v. J.C. Guerra, et al., Respondents (673 S.W.2d 180)...
AMES v. GREAT SOUTHERN BANK: Establishing Authority in CD Transactions

AMES v. GREAT SOUTHERN BANK: Establishing Authority in CD Transactions

Date: Jul 12, 1984
AMES v. GREAT SOUTHERN BANK: Establishing Authority in CD Transactions Introduction AMES v. GREAT SOUTHERN BANK, 672 S.W.2d 447 (1984), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas, addresses pivotal...
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Richardson v. Green: A Landmark Judgment on Hearsay Exceptions

Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Richardson v. Green: A Landmark Judgment on Hearsay Exceptions

Date: Jun 28, 1984
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Richardson v. Green: A Landmark Judgment on Hearsay Exceptions Introduction The case of Wesley Dwight Richardson v. Priscilla Kay Green, reported as 677 S.W.2d...
Extrinsic Fraud and Fiduciary Duty: Insights from Wilkinson v. Kennedy

Extrinsic Fraud and Fiduciary Duty: Insights from Wilkinson v. Kennedy

Date: Jun 7, 1984
Extrinsic Fraud and Fiduciary Duty: Insights from Wilkinson v. Kennedy Introduction The landmark case Virginia Lou Wilkinson Montgomery et al. v. Virginia McEntire Kennedy et al., decided by the...
Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Guidelines for Jury Instructions in Design Defect Product Liability Cases

Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Guidelines for Jury Instructions in Design Defect Product Liability Cases

Date: May 31, 1984
Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Guidelines for Jury Instructions in Design Defect Product Liability Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Roy ACORD, Jr. Indi v. Dually and A/N/F of Aaron...
Clarifying the Burden of Proof for Affirmative Defenses in Tortious Interference: Sakowitz, Inc. v. Diane Steck

Clarifying the Burden of Proof for Affirmative Defenses in Tortious Interference: Sakowitz, Inc. v. Diane Steck

Date: May 31, 1984
Clarifying the Burden of Proof for Affirmative Defenses in Tortious Interference: Sakowitz, Inc. v. Diane Steck Introduction The case of Sakowitz, Inc. v. Diane Steck, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Substantial Performance Cases: Vance Construction Co. v. My Apartment Steak House of San Antonio, Inc.

Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Substantial Performance Cases: Vance Construction Co. v. My Apartment Steak House of San Antonio, Inc.

Date: May 24, 1984
Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Substantial Performance Cases: Vance Construction Co. v. My Apartment Steak House of San Antonio, Inc. Introduction The case of John H. Vance, D/B/A Vance...
Employer's Duty of Care for Intoxicated Employees: Insights from Otis Engineering Corp. v. Clark

Employer's Duty of Care for Intoxicated Employees: Insights from Otis Engineering Corp. v. Clark

Date: May 17, 1984
Employer's Duty of Care for Intoxicated Employees: Insights from Otis Engineering Corp. v. Clark Introduction Otis Engineering Corporation v. Larry Clark et al. is a pivotal 1984 decision by the...
Independent Cause of Action for Loss of Consortium: Gracia v. RC Cola-7-Up Bottling Co.

Independent Cause of Action for Loss of Consortium: Gracia v. RC Cola-7-Up Bottling Co.

Date: May 3, 1984
Independent Cause of Action for Loss of Consortium: Gracia v. RC Cola-7-Up Bottling Co. Introduction Gracia v. RC Cola-7-Up Bottling Co. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Enhanced Recoverability of Mental Anguish and Loss of Use Damages under the Texas D.T.P.A.

Enhanced Recoverability of Mental Anguish and Loss of Use Damages under the Texas D.T.P.A.

Date: Apr 12, 1984
Enhanced Recoverability of Mental Anguish and Loss of Use Damages under the Texas D.T.P.A. Introduction Yolanda Luna v. North Star Dodge Sales, Inc., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Affirming Trial Court's Discretion on Expert Testimony Disclosure: Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Company

Affirming Trial Court's Discretion on Expert Testimony Disclosure: Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Company

Date: Mar 29, 1984
Affirming Trial Court's Discretion on Expert Testimony Disclosure: Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Company Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas, in Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Company, addressed...
Establishing Comparative Causation in Texas Product Liability: Analysis of DUNCAN v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO.

Establishing Comparative Causation in Texas Product Liability: Analysis of DUNCAN v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO.

Date: Mar 29, 1984
Establishing Comparative Causation in Texas Product Liability: Analysis of DUNCAN v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO., 665 S.W.2d 414 (Tex. 1984) Introduction DUNCAN v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO. is a landmark decision...
Discretionary Limits on Granting Continuances Based on Counsel Withdrawal: Texas v. Crank

Discretionary Limits on Granting Continuances Based on Counsel Withdrawal: Texas v. Crank

Date: Mar 22, 1984
Discretionary Limits on Granting Continuances Based on Counsel Withdrawal: Texas v. Crank Introduction Texas v. John Cameron Crank, D.D.S. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Re Teer v. Duddlesten et al.: Clarifying Partial Summary Judgments in Declaratory Actions

Re Teer v. Duddlesten et al.: Clarifying Partial Summary Judgments in Declaratory Actions

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Re Teer v. Duddlesten et al.: Clarifying Partial Summary Judgments in Declaratory Actions Introduction Reggie Teer et al. v. Wayne B. Duddlesten et al., 664 S.W.2d 702 (Tex. 1984), is a pivotal case...
Clarifying the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Cross-Claim Indemnity: BONNIWELL v. BEECH AIRCRAFT Corporation

Clarifying the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Cross-Claim Indemnity: BONNIWELL v. BEECH AIRCRAFT Corporation

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Clarifying the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Cross-Claim Indemnity: BONNIWELL v. BEECH AIRCRAFT Corporation Introduction The case of Mrs. Lynn E. Bonniwell, et al. v. Beech Aircraft...
Substantial Evidence and Fact-Finding in Certificate of Need Decisions: Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.

Substantial Evidence and Fact-Finding in Certificate of Need Decisions: Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.

Date: Feb 16, 1984
Substantial Evidence and Fact-Finding in Certificate of Need Decisions: Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc. Introduction Texas Health Facilities Commission et al.,...
Enforcement of Contractual Lien Provisions under Texas Law: Ogden v. Dickinson State Bank

Enforcement of Contractual Lien Provisions under Texas Law: Ogden v. Dickinson State Bank

Date: Jan 19, 1984
Enforcement of Contractual Lien Provisions under Texas Law: Ogden v. Dickinson State Bank Introduction John Wallace Ogden et ux. v. Dickinson State Bank is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Litton Industrial Products v. Earnest Gammage: Clarifying Treble Damages and Waiver Under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act

Litton Industrial Products v. Earnest Gammage: Clarifying Treble Damages and Waiver Under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act

Date: Jan 12, 1984
Litton Industrial Products v. Earnest Gammage: Clarifying Treble Damages and Waiver Under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act Introduction The case of Litton Industrial Products, Inc. et al. v. Earnest...
Affirmation of Trial Court's Discretion in Denying Easement: Jackson v. Van Winkle

Affirmation of Trial Court's Discretion in Denying Easement: Jackson v. Van Winkle

Date: Jan 1, 1984
Affirmation of Trial Court's Discretion in Denying Easement: Jackson v. Van Winkle Introduction John C. Jackson et al. v. Jesse L. Van Winkle et al. (660 S.W.2d 807), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Texas Supreme Court Restricts the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Contracts

Texas Supreme Court Restricts the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Contracts

Date: Dec 15, 1983
Texas Supreme Court Restricts the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of Sarah Jane English v. Jerry E. Fischer and Alice Ann Fischer,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert