Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Viles v. Security National Insurance Co.: Reinforcing the Duty of Good Faith in Insurance Contracts

Viles v. Security National Insurance Co.: Reinforcing the Duty of Good Faith in Insurance Contracts

Date: May 24, 1990
Viles v. Security National Insurance Co.: Reinforcing the Duty of Good Faith in Insurance Contracts Introduction The case of William J. Viles and Mary R. Viles v. Security National Insurance Company,...
Mandatory Allowance of Post-Verdict Damages Amendment under Tex. R.Civ.P. 63 and 66: Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance

Mandatory Allowance of Post-Verdict Damages Amendment under Tex. R.Civ.P. 63 and 66: Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance

Date: May 24, 1990
Mandatory Allowance of Post-Verdict Damages Amendment under Tex. R.Civ.P. 63 and 66: Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance Introduction Richard Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance Company, 787...
Discovery Rule Exclusion in Texas Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations

Discovery Rule Exclusion in Texas Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations

Date: May 10, 1990
Discovery Rule Exclusion in Texas Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations Case: Alfred MORENO et al. v. STERLING DRUG, INC. Citation: 787 S.W.2d 348 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990) Date: May 9, 1990...
Teller's Checks Subject to Stop Payment and Defenses: Texas Supreme Court Sets Precedent

Teller's Checks Subject to Stop Payment and Defenses: Texas Supreme Court Sets Precedent

Date: May 10, 1990
Teller's Checks Subject to Stop Payment and Defenses: Texas Supreme Court Sets Precedent Introduction In the landmark case Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. The Horseshoe Operating Company, the...
Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Jurisdictional Attachment Upon Filing Writ of Error

Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Jurisdictional Attachment Upon Filing Writ of Error

Date: Mar 8, 1990
Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Jurisdictional Attachment Upon Filing Writ of Error Introduction In the landmark case of Mapco, Inc., et al. v. The Honorable Shirley Forrest, Clerk, and the Ninth...
Offsetting Benefits in Reimbursement Claims: Insights from PENICK v. PENICK

Offsetting Benefits in Reimbursement Claims: Insights from PENICK v. PENICK

Date: Feb 22, 1990
Offsetting Benefits in Reimbursement Claims: Insights from PENICK v. PENICK Introduction Robert James Penick (Petitioner) versus Maria C. Penick (Respondent) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Clarifying Causation Standards in FELA Cases: Insights from Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company

Clarifying Causation Standards in FELA Cases: Insights from Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company

Date: Feb 22, 1990
Clarifying Causation Standards in FELA Cases: Insights from Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company Introduction The case of H.W. Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company,...
Establishing General Jurisdiction Through Systematic and Continuing Contacts: SCHLOBOHM v. SCHAPIRO Commentary

Establishing General Jurisdiction Through Systematic and Continuing Contacts: SCHLOBOHM v. SCHAPIRO Commentary

Date: Feb 15, 1990
Establishing General Jurisdiction Through Systematic and Continuing Contacts: SCHLOBOHM v. SCHAPIRO Commentary Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas, in SCHLOBOHM v. SCHAPIRO (784 S.W.2d 355,...
Expanding Governmental Liability: Waiver of Immunity under Texas Tort Claims Act in Robinson v. Central Texas MHMR

Expanding Governmental Liability: Waiver of Immunity under Texas Tort Claims Act in Robinson v. Central Texas MHMR

Date: Nov 23, 1989
Expanding Governmental Liability: Waiver of Immunity under Texas Tort Claims Act in Robinson v. Central Texas MHMR Introduction Robinson v. Central Texas MHMR Center, 780 S.W.2d 169 (Tex. 1989), is a...
Jurisdictional Sufficiency of Petitions in Wrongful Death Actions: Insights from Peek v. Equipment Service Company

Jurisdictional Sufficiency of Petitions in Wrongful Death Actions: Insights from Peek v. Equipment Service Company

Date: Nov 9, 1989
Jurisdictional Sufficiency of Petitions in Wrongful Death Actions: Insights from Peek v. Equipment Service Company Introduction Peek v. Equipment Service Company of San Antonio is a pivotal case...
Texas Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Guidelines for Underinsured Motorist Coverage in Stracener v. USAA (1989)

Texas Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Guidelines for Underinsured Motorist Coverage in Stracener v. USAA (1989)

Date: Oct 19, 1989
Texas Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Guidelines for Underinsured Motorist Coverage in Stracener v. USAA (1989) Introduction The Texas Supreme Court, in the landmark case Stracener v. United...
Revised Standards for Summary Judgment in Public Figure Defamation: Insights from Casso v. Brand

Revised Standards for Summary Judgment in Public Figure Defamation: Insights from Casso v. Brand

Date: Oct 12, 1989
Revised Standards for Summary Judgment in Public Figure Defamation: Insights from Casso v. Brand Introduction Ramiro Casso, M.D., Petitioner, v. Othal E. Brand, Respondent (776 S.W.2d 551) is a...
Defining Litigation Commencement in Workers' Compensation Cases: Flores v. The Fourth Court of Appeals

Defining Litigation Commencement in Workers' Compensation Cases: Flores v. The Fourth Court of Appeals

Date: Oct 12, 1989
Defining Litigation Commencement in Workers' Compensation Cases: Flores v. The Fourth Court of Appeals Introduction In the landmark case George Flores v. The Fourth Court of Appeals (777 S.W.2d 38,...
Mandamus Standards in Discovery Objections: Analyzing Loftin v. Martin

Mandamus Standards in Discovery Objections: Analyzing Loftin v. Martin

Date: Oct 5, 1989
Mandamus Standards in Discovery Objections: Analyzing Loftin v. Martin Introduction Loftin v. Martin, 776 S.W.2d 145 (Tex. 1989), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas that...
Edgewood I.S.D. v. Kirby: Redefining Efficiency in Texas School Financing

Edgewood I.S.D. v. Kirby: Redefining Efficiency in Texas School Financing

Date: Oct 3, 1989
Edgewood I.S.D. v. Kirby: Redefining Efficiency in Texas School Financing Introduction Edgewood Independent School District et al., Petitioners, v. William Kirby et al., Respondents, 777 S.W.2d 391,...
Assessment of Attorneys' Fees under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Har v. Donwerth et ux.

Assessment of Attorneys' Fees under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Har v. Donwerth et ux.

Date: Sep 21, 1989
Assessment of Attorneys' Fees under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Har v. Donwerth et ux. Introduction Harvey E. Donwerth et ux., Petitioners, appealed the decision of the Supreme Court of Texas...
Interstate vs. Intrastate Commerce in Motor Carrier Operations: Southern States Transportation, Inc. v. Texas

Interstate vs. Intrastate Commerce in Motor Carrier Operations: Southern States Transportation, Inc. v. Texas

Date: Sep 14, 1989
Interstate vs. Intrastate Commerce in Motor Carrier Operations: Southern States Transportation, Inc. v. Texas Introduction The case of Southern States Transportation, Inc. v. The State of Texas (774...
Establishing Civil Nature of Disciplinary Actions: State Bar of Texas v. Robert L. Evans, Jr. Commentary

Establishing Civil Nature of Disciplinary Actions: State Bar of Texas v. Robert L. Evans, Jr. Commentary

Date: Sep 14, 1989
Establishing Civil Nature of Disciplinary Actions: State Bar of Texas v. Robert L. Evans, Jr. Introduction State Bar of Texas v. Robert L. Evans, Jr. is a pivotal 1989 decision by the Supreme Court...
Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Objective Standard in Legal Malpractice: Disallows 'Good Faith' Defense in COSGROVE v. GRIMES

Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Objective Standard in Legal Malpractice: Disallows 'Good Faith' Defense in COSGROVE v. GRIMES

Date: Jun 29, 1989
Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Objective Standard in Legal Malpractice: Disallows 'Good Faith' Defense in COSGROVE v. GRIMES Introduction In Frank Cosgrove v. Walter Grimes et al., the Supreme...
Actual Malice and Summary Judgment in Defamation Cases: Carr and Thiel v. Brasher

Actual Malice and Summary Judgment in Defamation Cases: Carr and Thiel v. Brasher

Date: Jun 22, 1989
Actual Malice and Summary Judgment in Defamation Cases: Carr and Thiel v. Brasher Introduction The case of Carr and Thiel v. Lynn Brasher (776 S.W.2d 567) presents a pivotal moment in Texas...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert